Keep useful evidence without unnecessary exposure
Redaction helps teams share the insight in a comment while removing details that should not travel widely.
Feature
Review, redact, and curate student comments before verbatim evidence is shared beyond the analysis team.
Student Voice Analytics supports review and redaction workflows for student comments. Teams can prepare verbatim extracts for reports while reducing the risk of sharing sensitive or identifying detail.
Discuss the source data, reporting question, outputs and delivery window.
Survey teams, governance leads, report authors, and teams sharing verbatim evidence.
Verbatim comments are powerful evidence, but they can include personal details, sensitive incidents, or wording that needs context. Teams need a controlled process before comments appear in wider reports.
Redaction helps teams share the insight in a comment while removing details that should not travel widely.
A review step gives staff a chance to check tone, sensitivity, and context before a comment is used.
Curated extracts are easier for committees and local teams to read, discuss, and connect to action.
No. Redaction workflows support review; they do not replace institutional judgement about what should be shared.
Yes. Comments can be withheld if they are too sensitive, identifying, or context-dependent for the intended audience.
Yes. Approved or redacted comments can be included in workbooks and extracts used by local teams.
Discuss the source data, reporting question and outputs your team needs. Explore the worked example before agreeing the scope and delivery window.
Discuss your survey