Feature

Find the verbatim comments that make an insight defensible

Find and use student verbatim comments as traceable evidence while keeping them connected to theme, sentiment, and survey context.

Student Voice Analytics keeps verbatim comments connected to the themes, sentiment, and metadata behind each insight. Teams can move from a summary claim to the comments that support it.

Discuss your survey

Discuss the source data, reporting question, outputs and delivery window.

Who this is for

Quality teams, student experience teams, committee report authors, and service owners.

Why it matters

Summary charts are useful, but committees often need to see the underlying student words. Without a searchable evidence base, finding representative comments becomes slow, selective, and hard to defend.

What teams get

Connect each claim to the student voice

Report authors can support commentary with comments that match the theme, tone, and survey context of the insight.

Reduce anecdotal selection

Because comments sit inside the full classified dataset, teams can choose examples from a known category rather than from memory or a small manual sample.

Prepare evidence for different audiences

Verbatim extracts can be used for senior briefings, local action plans, professional service reviews, and quality enhancement discussions.

How it works

Classify comments and retain their connection to source survey metadata.
Search or filter the evidence set by topic, sentiment, year, or group.
Review comments for sensitivity before wider sharing.
Use selected extracts in reports with clear context and traceability.

Outputs

Traceable comment extracts for reports.
Positive and negative examples by theme or category.
Evidence packs for schools, services, and committees.
A structured route from summary insight to source comment.

Governance and evidence quality

Agree the survey, questions, reporting populations and intended audience before analysis.
Keep category definitions, analysis versions and denominators with the output.
Review relevant comments and ambiguous cases alongside the summary.
Agree data handling, access and the level of detail appropriate for each audience.

FAQs

Can verbatim comments be linked back to themes?

Yes. Comments remain connected to the category, theme, sentiment, survey, and metadata used in the analysis.

Can sensitive comments be checked before sharing?

Yes. Teams can review, redact, and curate comments before extracts are circulated beyond the analysis group.

Does this replace qualitative judgement?

No. It gives teams a better evidence base for judgement by making the relevant comments easier to find and review.

See the workflow with your team

Discuss the source data, reporting question and outputs your team needs. Explore the worked example before agreeing the scope and delivery window.