Solution

Use student comments as evidence for EDI work

Use open-text student comments to understand differences in experience, barriers to belonging, and evidence for inclusive action.

Student Voice Analytics helps institutions examine student comments through an EDI lens, using approved demographic cuts, HE-specific themes, and reviewed evidence to understand where experiences differ.

Discuss your survey

Discuss the source data, reporting question, outputs and delivery window.

Who this is for

EDI leads, student experience teams, quality teams, and senior education leaders.

Why it matters

EDI work often needs more than a score gap. Comments can show what students experienced, how strongly they felt it, and which barriers need attention, but only if the evidence is structured and handled carefully.

What teams get

Move from aggregate averages to lived experience

Open-text analysis helps teams see how different groups describe assessment, support, belonging, resources, and communication.

Use evidence responsibly

Human review, redaction, and careful grouping help teams use sensitive comment evidence without overclaiming.

Connect EDI insight to action planning

Outputs can feed equality action plans, student success work, committee papers, and local enhancement discussions.

How it works

Confirm demographic fields and reporting rules with institutional stakeholders.
Analyse comment themes and sentiment by approved groups.
Review sensitive extracts before they are used in reports.
Translate the evidence into actions, owners, and follow-up questions.

Outputs

EDI-focused comment summaries.
Theme differences by approved group.
Reviewed verbatim evidence for internal use.
Action-plan evidence linked to student comments.

Governance and evidence quality

Agree the survey, questions, reporting populations and intended audience before analysis.
Keep category definitions, analysis versions and denominators with the output.
Review relevant comments and ambiguous cases alongside the summary.
Agree data handling, access and the level of detail appropriate for each audience.

FAQs

Can this support Access and Participation or student success work?

Yes. Comment evidence can add context to quantitative gaps and help teams understand what students say is driving the experience.

Does the analysis identify individuals?

The workflow is designed for institutional analysis, not individual identification. Sensitive comments should be reviewed and redacted before sharing.

Can EDI insight be reported by school or department?

Yes, where the data includes the required metadata and group sizes are suitable for responsible reporting.

See the workflow with your team

Discuss the source data, reporting question and outputs your team needs. Explore the worked example before agreeing the scope and delivery window.