Leeds Trinity's PRES results show what strong PGR feedback practice looks like

By Student Voice AI

Updated Apr 13, 2026

Leeds Trinity University's latest PRES result matters because it shows what strong postgraduate researcher feedback practice looks like when improvement appears across multiple themes, not just one headline score. In its 26 February 2026 announcement, the university reported best-ever results in the Postgraduate Research Experience Survey (PRES), with 88% overall satisfaction against the 83% sector average cited in the announcement. For institutions already reviewing PRES 2025 or UKRI's refreshed expectations for postgraduate research support, the useful signal is not just that Leeds Trinity performed well. It is that the university can point to where the PGR experience appears to have improved.

What has changed in Leeds Trinity's PRES results

Leeds Trinity says it recorded its highest ever ratings for research skills, professional development, responsibilities, support, and progress and assessment. According to the announcement, the university placed in the top 25% of participating institutions for each of those themes. It also says it ranked among the top-performing institutions for postgraduate researchers' confidence in completing their degree on time.

The strongest movement appears in areas institutions can actually influence directly, which is what makes the result useful beyond Leeds Trinity itself. Leeds Trinity reports improvements in 10 of the 11 measures within development opportunities, alongside gains in support and progress-related measures that often shape doctoral competency confidence. The announcement frames that as evidence of a stronger research culture, but also as part of a wider institutional push tied to strategic goals including research degree awarding powers.

"These are exceptional results for Leeds Trinity University and a clear reflection of the vibrant, nurturing environment we provide."

Professor Martin Barwood, Director of Postgraduate Research Studies, Leeds Trinity University

This is a local result within an annual Advance HE survey, not a new national methodology or regulatory change. Leeds Trinity notes that PRES covers institutions in the UK and Australia, so the practical takeaway is straightforward: one provider is showing where its PGR experience has strengthened, and doing so through a benchmarked sector instrument.

What this means for institutions

First, universities should not read a strong PRES outcome as a communications story alone. The Leeds Trinity announcement is useful because the improvement is not confined to one headline score. It spans research skills, support, progress and assessment, and development opportunities. That kind of spread suggests a more joined-up PGR experience, which gives institutions clearer clues about where improvement work is landing.

Second, this is a reminder that postgraduate research feedback only becomes useful when it is broken down into operational PGR themes that doctoral colleges, supervisors, and quality teams can act on. If confidence in completion, professional development, or support improves, leaders should know which supervisory practices, training offers, or communications changes contributed, and whether those gains are shared across disciplines and cohorts.

For student experience teams and PVCs, the benefit of that approach is simple: it turns benchmarked survey results into visible follow-through. Institutions that can show how PGR feedback informs researcher development, assessment processes, and support services are in a stronger position for enhancement work and for demonstrating that student voice in higher education is taken seriously beyond the annual survey cycle.

How student feedback analysis connects

At Student Voice AI, we think results like these become far more actionable when institutions go beyond quartiles and analyse the open-text behind them. High PRES scores tell you where performance is strong, but they do not tell you which parts of doctoral supervision and feedback practice, research culture, skills development, or administrative support students are actually responding to.

That matters even more in PGR settings, where cohorts are smaller and issues are often highly contextual. A structured read of comments can separate themes such as supervision, belonging, progression, and development opportunities, then connect them to local action plans with named owners. Our Student Voice AI + evasys + Advance HE for PTES & PRES 2025 post shows how that kind of open-text analysis is already part of mainstream postgraduate survey practice. If you are tightening your own process, our student comment analysis governance checklist is a useful starting point.

FAQ

Q: What should institutions do now if they want to learn from Leeds Trinity's PRES results?

A: Benchmark your own PGR results theme by theme rather than relying on overall satisfaction alone. Then review open comments and local doctoral feedback to identify two or three specific actions around development opportunities, support, completion confidence, or assessment processes, with named owners and a clear follow-up plan.

Q: Is this a sector-wide PRES change, or a local result?

A: It is a local result. Leeds Trinity published the announcement on 26 February 2026, and it relates to the university's performance in the annual PRES run by Advance HE. The announcement says the survey covers institutions in the UK and Australia, but it is not a new national methodology change or regulatory requirement.

Q: What is the broader implication for student voice in postgraduate research?

A: The main implication is that strong PGR feedback practice needs more than a headline score. Institutions get more value from PRES when they can attribute results to specific elements of the research experience, analyse the open-text that explains them, and show postgraduate researchers what changed in response.

References

[Leeds Trinity University]: "Leeds Trinity University achieves best-ever results in Postgraduate Research Experience Survey" Published: 2026-02-26

Request a walkthrough

Book a free Student Voice Analytics demo

See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and reporting designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.

All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
Versioned outputs with TEF-ready reporting.
Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.

Prefer email? info@studentvoice.ai

UK-hosted · No public LLM APIs · Same-day turnaround