Updated Apr 02, 2026
PRES 2025 reports the highest postgraduate research satisfaction in more than a decade, but that headline should push universities to look harder, not relax. If you want to sustain that progress, you need to know which parts of the PGR experience improved, where gaps still remain, and what the comments say teams should change next. On 19 February 2026, Advance HE published headline findings from the Postgraduate Research Experience Survey (PRES) 2025, reporting the highest overall satisfaction in more than 10 years. For universities, the value is not just knowing that satisfaction is up. It is understanding what is improving beneath the average score and turning that evidence into visible action. [Advance HE announcement]
Advance HE reports that PRES 2025 includes 35,514 postgraduate researchers across 93 institutions, including four in Australia. The headline shift is positive: overall satisfaction is up to 74.6%, an increase of 1.5 percentage points on the previous year. For institutions, that points to areas where policy and practice may be improving, but it does not yet tell you which changes made the difference.
The announcement also highlights improvements in areas that often drive “why” behind PGR feedback:
Two equity signals are particularly relevant for institutions using student voice evidence in quality enhancement. First, Advance HE notes that female PGR satisfaction is now on a par with male PGR satisfaction. Second, disabled PGR satisfaction remains lower (70.1%), which makes segmentation and follow-up action essential, especially when institutions need to understand the intersectional barriers disabled students describe. For doctoral colleges, the takeaway is clear: read the headline improvement and the subgroup picture together, or you risk missing where support still needs to change.
“These findings show that investing in the right things can bring down dissatisfaction and improve satisfaction overall.” Jonathan Neves, Chief Executive, Advance HE
If your institution participates in PRES, these results are a useful benchmarking moment, but they are also a reminder that top-line satisfaction is an outcome, not an intervention. To decide what to do next, teams need to translate survey results into a small set of addressable priorities such as supervision consistency, access to facilities, research community and culture, and practical support. That is what makes the data usable in doctoral college planning rather than simply interesting in a slide deck.
PRES 2025 also reinforces the case for disaggregating PGR feedback beyond “all respondents”. Parity improvements are worth recognising, but the persistence of a satisfaction gap for disabled PGRs makes it risky to rely on averages. Institutions should expect to take a second pass that looks at where experience differs by protected characteristic, discipline, mode, and stage, then map those differences to specific changes and owners. That is how you turn a benchmark into accountable follow-through, and it is increasingly important as UKRI sharpens expectations for PGR feedback evidence.
Finally, the areas highlighted by Advance HE are exactly the ones where PGRs tend to provide the most useful specificity in qualitative comments: what “belonging” looks like day to day, where research culture is thriving or fraying, and what support feels missing. That is the level of detail that helps teams move from reporting to action, and it gives supervisors, doctoral colleges, and committees something concrete to improve.
Student Voice AI carried out the full free-text analysis on all PRES 2025 data. Advance HE commissioned Student Voice AI, in partnership with survey platform evasys, to provide thematic coding and dashboards for every open-text comment submitted across all 93 participating institutions. The analysis covers both open questions, "most positive aspect" and "one thing to improve", and classifies each sentence into 26 PGR-specific sub-categories using our UK higher education trained machine-learning model. This is the fourth consecutive year Student Voice AI has delivered PRES open-text analysis for Advance HE. For full details on the commission, see our announcement post.
The numbers tell you where to look; the comments tell you what to fix first. Pairing the PRES headline metrics with repeatable analysis of open-text helps institutions move from reporting satisfaction shifts to attributing them to specific aspects of supervision, culture, facilities, and support. That makes the findings easier to prioritise, resource, and explain back to PGRs, especially when teams interpret sentiment analysis for universities alongside themes rather than as a standalone score.
If you want your analysis to be usable in supervisor development, doctoral college planning, and committee reporting, map open-text to a stable PGR theme structure, then track themes over time. For an example theme structure, see our PGR comment themes and categories resource. If you need a reproducible way to do that across PRES, local doctoral surveys, and other feedback channels, explore Student Voice Analytics. For teams scaling analysis across multiple surveys and internal channels, our governance checklist is a practical starting point.
Q: What should institutions do now with the PRES 2025 results?
A: Use the headline shifts to prioritise a short list of action areas, then triangulate with open-text and local intelligence. In practice, that means: segment by key cohorts (including disabled PGRs), identify the biggest drivers of dissatisfaction by theme, assign owners, and publish “you said, we did” updates so PGRs can see what changed.
Q: Who is PRES 2025 based on, and is it UK-wide?
A: Advance HE reports that PRES 2025 includes 35,514 postgraduate researchers across 93 institutions, including four in Australia. UK institutions typically use it as a sector benchmark for the PGR experience, alongside local doctoral surveys and pulse feedback.
Q: How does this change how we should use student voice evidence?
A: It strengthens the case for treating PGR feedback as an ongoing quality signal, not a once-a-year report. When satisfaction shifts, open-text analysis helps you attribute change to specific aspects of experience (supervision, culture, facilities, support) and evidence what you did in response.
[Advance HE]: "Postgraduate research experience up to highest level of satisfaction in more than 10 years"
Published: 2026-02-19
[Advance HE]: "Postgraduate Research Experience Survey (PRES)"
Published: 2025-11-04
[Advance HE]: "Postgraduate Research Experience Survey 2025"
Published: 2026-02-19
Request a walkthrough
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and reporting designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
UK-hosted · No public LLM APIs · Same-day turnaround
Research, regulation, and insight on student voice. Every Friday.
© Student Voice Systems Limited, All rights reserved.