Jisc Online Surveys adds a 'None of the above' option, and why it matters for student feedback data quality
Updated May 26, 2026
A "None of the above" option can look trivial until a feedback form forces students into choosing an answer that does not fit. On 6 May 2026, Jisc published Allow your respondents to tell you when your answers don't apply, announcing that Online Surveys users can now add a "None of the above" option to multi-answer Choice questions. For Student Experience teams, PVCs, and quality professionals, that matters because many universities use Jisc Online Surveys for module evaluations, pulse checks, and service feedback, and small choices in survey design can change how trustworthy local student feedback looks once it reaches a dashboard or committee paper.
What has changed in Jisc Online Surveys' "None of the above" option
The core change is specific. Jisc says survey builders can now add a "None of the above" option to multiple-answer Choice questions, giving respondents a clear way to say that none of the listed answers apply rather than skipping the question or choosing an inaccurate option. Jisc also says the feature behaves as an exclusive answer: if "None of the above" is selected, it clears any other choices, and if another choice is selected afterwards, "None of the above" is cleared. That matters because it prevents contradictory data being stored as if it were meaningful response behaviour.
"This helps keep your response data clean and avoids contradictory answers."
The release timeline is also clear. Jisc's change log records the feature in version v3.37.0 on 5 May 2026, and the public product update followed on 6 May 2026. This is a Jisc Online Surveys platform change, not a change to NSS, PTES, PRES, UKES, or OfS survey methodology. Its immediate scope is local survey work run through Jisc, including module evaluation, service review, and in-term pulse collection. The takeaway is straightforward: universities now have a cleaner way to let students reject a poorly fitting answer set without weakening the response record.
What this means for institutions
The first implication is question quality. Multi-answer questions often ask students which support routes they used, what barriers they encountered, or which teaching formats helped most. Without a genuine "none" route, some respondents will either leave the question blank or select the least-wrong answer. That may seem minor at the level of one module, but across an institution it can distort the pattern teams think they are seeing. It also builds on Jisc's earlier move to separate single-answer and multi-answer question types, which was already aimed at making local survey data easier to trust.
The second implication is comparability. If one faculty adds "None of the above" and another does not, or if the option appears mid-cycle rather than at the start of a new template version, percentages may shift for methodological reasons rather than experience reasons. That is why local teams should record when the option was introduced, which questions use it, and whether historic trend lines should be read with caution. The same discipline matters whenever institutions compare survey findings across schools or years, as we noted in student evaluation scores not being automatically comparable. The practical takeaway is simple: document the question logic before you interpret the trend.
The third implication is respondent trust. A well-placed "None of the above" option does not solve survey fatigue on its own, but it does reduce one small source of friction by letting students answer accurately when the list is incomplete. That matters most in local feedback systems that ask several operational questions in a row. If students keep meeting answer sets that do not fit their experience, they are more likely to disengage or rush through later items. Cleaner response options are therefore part of building a survey experience that is easier for students to complete carefully and easier for institutions to defend afterwards.
How student feedback analysis connects
This update matters for comment analysis because closed-question logic often determines how open comments are grouped and read later. If a student is forced to select an inaccurate option in a multi-answer question, their free-text comment may be analysed in the wrong segment or treated as evidence of a pattern that was partly created by the questionnaire itself. Giving respondents a clean way to say "none apply" reduces that risk and makes the surrounding comments easier to interpret with confidence.
At Student Voice AI, we see the value when institutions treat small survey-builder changes as part of evidence governance, not as housekeeping. Student Voice Analytics can help teams compare comments across Jisc survey cycles with a reproducible method, while our student comment analysis governance checklist helps document when question logic changed and how that affects interpretation. The point is practical: cleaner closed-question data gives institutions a stronger base for deciding which open-text themes are real, where they sit, and what should happen next.
FAQ
Q: What should institutions do now if they use Jisc Online Surveys for student feedback?
A: Review any multi-answer Choice questions in shared Jisc templates, especially those asking about service use, barriers, or support routes. Decide where "None of the above" improves accuracy, add it consistently, and note the change in your method log before comparing new results with older survey data.
Q: What is the timeline and scope of the Jisc Online Surveys update?
A: Jisc recorded the feature in Online Surveys v3.37.0 on 5 May 2026, and published the product update on 6 May 2026. It applies to institutions using Jisc Online Surveys for local survey work. It does not change NSS, PTES, PRES, UKES, or OfS survey rules.
Q: What is the broader implication for student voice?
A: The broader implication is that student voice evidence becomes more defensible when students are given an accurate way to answer closed questions. Better answer logic reduces forced or contradictory selections, which makes both the numbers and the accompanying comments easier to trust and act on.
References
[Jisc Online Surveys]: "Allow your respondents to tell you when your answers don't apply" Published: 2026-05-06
[Jisc Online Surveys]: "Change log" Published: 2026-05-05
Request a walkthrough
Book a free Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and reporting designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
- All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
- Versioned outputs with TEF-ready reporting.
- Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
UK-hosted · No public LLM APIs · Same-day turnaround