Feature

Give each school a report they can act on

Create local student feedback reports for schools, departments, faculties, or campuses using consistent institution-wide analysis.

Student Voice Analytics can produce reports by school, department, faculty, campus, or other supplied grouping. Each local report uses the same taxonomy, sentiment method, and benchmark logic as the institution-wide analysis.

Discuss your survey

Discuss the source data, reporting question, outputs and delivery window.

Who this is for

Faculty leaders, school leadership teams, quality partners, and central survey teams.

Why it matters

Central reports are useful, but local teams need their own evidence. Without consistent local reporting, every school can end up interpreting comments differently or asking analysts for bespoke manual extracts.

What teams get

Local detail without local inconsistency

Schools get relevant evidence while the institution keeps a common method, taxonomy, and reporting standard.

Make central analysis useful to local owners

Each report can show the themes, strengths, risks, and verbatim evidence most relevant to that unit.

Reduce repeated analyst work

Consistent templates make it easier to produce packs across many units without rebuilding analysis for each one.

How it works

Map student comments to the organisational fields supplied by the institution.
Generate theme, sentiment, and comment evidence for each unit.
Add comparison points such as institutional or sector benchmarks where appropriate.
Deliver reports or exports for local planning and review cycles.

Outputs

School, department, faculty, or campus reports.
Local top positive and negative themes.
Evidence extracts for local action plans.
Consistent report packs for central oversight.

Governance and evidence quality

Agree the survey, questions, reporting populations and intended audience before analysis.
Keep category definitions, analysis versions and denominators with the output.
Review relevant comments and ambiguous cases alongside the summary.
Agree data handling, access and the level of detail appropriate for each audience.

FAQs

Can reports be generated for any organisational structure?

Reports can use the groupings present in the supplied data, such as school, department, faculty, campus, programme, or module.

Will local reports use the same categories as the central report?

Yes. A shared taxonomy keeps local reporting comparable across the institution.

Can local teams get verbatim evidence?

Yes, with review and redaction where comments are sensitive or need careful handling before sharing.

See the workflow with your team

Discuss the source data, reporting question and outputs your team needs. Explore the worked example before agreeing the scope and delivery window.