Is remote learning working for economics students?
Mostly, economics students report that remote learning is a weak point: in the NSS (National Student Survey) the remote learning topic spans ~12,933 comments and reads net-negative (53.8% Negative), and within economics, the CAH discipline grouping used for sector benchmarking, the tone on remote delivery sits at −16.7. Mode matters: full‑time cohorts score more negatively than part‑time (index −11.2 vs +6.5), so effective design prioritises predictable structure, interaction and alignment to assessment.
How adaptable is remote learning for economics students?
The shift towards remote learning has significantly changed the educational environment for economics students. The quantitative and software‑reliant nature of many modules means access to econometrics packages and datasets is foundational, not optional. Students who adapt well to digital study benefit from flexible timetables and searchable resources; others miss the structure and immediate guidance of in‑person study.
Institutions should standardise remote‑first materials and rhythms: a single link hub per module, captioned recordings, transcripts and low‑bandwidth versions, with shorter teaching blocks and signposted tasks. Brief online orientation for new cohorts and a one‑page “how we work online” playbook smooths the start. Staff sustain collaboration by scheduling regular online touchpoints that mirror the cohort culture of classroom teaching.
What changes in the learning experience online?
Remote lectures improve flexibility through recordings but can reduce the immediacy of dialogue needed to test complex models and assumptions. Well‑structured discussion prompts and group tasks help, but require explicit roles, timelines and assessment links to secure broad participation.
Real‑time virtual seminars and tutorials work when they foreground application and allow rapid Q&A. Every live session should have a timely, searchable recording and a concise summary of takeaways to maintain asynchronous parity. Connectivity and study‑space constraints still limit some students’ participation, so timetabled alternatives and written follow‑ups are necessary.
How do students access resources equitably online?
The move online exposes variation in access to textbooks, articles and data tools. Departments should negotiate broader licences, invest in institution‑wide subscriptions and provide virtual desktops or remote labs for specialist software. Training on platforms and data literacy, integrated into modules, helps students use resources effectively. A stable, centralised resource hub with alt‑text and accessible formats reduces friction and supports equitable access.
How should assessment adapt for remote delivery in economics?
Assessment clarity drives confidence. Economics students consistently foreground marking criteria, assessment methods and feedback, so teams should publish annotated exemplars and checklist‑style rubrics, map tasks to learning outcomes, and agree a realistic service level for feedback turnaround. Moderation and calibration notes help on fairness and consistency across markers and modules.
Where online exams are unsuitable, open‑book coursework and applied projects can evidence analytical skill, with academic integrity supported by scaffolding, transparent expectations and viva‑style checks where proportionate. Staff need to provide detailed, developmental feedback that guides next steps and reflects the assessment brief and marking criteria.
What fosters interaction with peers and staff online?
Interaction thrives when predictability and inclusion are designed in. Structured office hours, time‑zone‑aware availability for international students, and small‑group seminars with named roles support participation. Forums work when staff seed substantive prompts and close threads with syntheses of what was learned. Weekly digests that capture changes to timetables and resources reduce noise and help students track priorities.
Which technological barriers matter most?
Specialist econometrics software often needs robust devices and specific configurations. Institutions should provide remote lab access, VPN‑enabled software, and loan schemes for hardware and connectivity. Monitoring common friction points weekly (access, audio, link churn, timetable slips) and publishing a brief “what we fixed” update shows students their feedback leads to action. Actively inviting students to report barriers keeps provision aligned to real study contexts.
What are the future implications for economics graduates?
Remote learning builds independence, time management and problem‑solving that employers value, but can narrow informal networking. Departments can mitigate this by hosting online guest lectures, industry Q&A, skills workshops and virtual careers events, and by curating peer‑to‑peer study communities that persist beyond assessment deadlines.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
- Surface what matters by programme: track topic volume and sentiment over time, with drill‑downs from provider to school and cohort for remote learning and economics.
- Compare like with like: slice results by mode, age, domicile/ethnicity, disability and CAH subject group to see whether economics is moving relative to its peer set.
- Turn comments into action: produce concise, anonymised summaries for programme teams that prioritise delivery, assessment clarity and timetabling fixes.
- Share progress quickly: export tables and charts for briefings, governance and continuous improvement cycles.
Book a Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and standards and NSS requirements.
More posts on remote learning:
- Can remote learning work for dentistry students?
- What does student feedback tell us about remote learning in History?
- Does remote learning work for sport and exercise sciences?
- Are applied psychology students positive about remote learning?