What do business and management students say about assessment?
Updated Mar 16, 2026
assessment methodsbusiness and managementBusiness and management students can handle demanding assessment; what frustrates them is assessment that feels unclear, inconsistent, or uneven. In the UK National Student Survey (NSS), the Assessment methods theme skews negative across the sector: 28.0% Positive, 66.2% Negative, 5.8% Neutral (index −18.8) from 11,318 comments. In business and management (non-specific), students are more positive overall (≈52.6% Positive, 42.8% Negative), yet concerns still cluster around Assessment methods (2.8%, −21.2) and Marking criteria (4.0%, −46.5). Together, those patterns point to practical fixes that improve confidence quickly: concise briefs, checklist rubrics, marker calibration, and programme-level coordination.
Assignment Structure?
In Business and Management, well-structured assignments let students show both subject knowledge and judgement in realistic scenarios. The benefit is simple: clearer briefs reduce confusion, improve confidence, and make marks feel fairer.
Assessment variety also matters. Written assignments support deeper analysis, while case studies and simulations test whether students can apply theory in practice, a balance explored in business studies assessment methods. Use a mix that reflects different skills and aligns clearly to learning outcomes.
Feedback loops help staff see where assignment design is creating avoidable friction. Use student surveys and text analysis to identify those pressure points, then respond with one-page assessment briefs, checklist-style rubrics, and earlier release dates in accessible formats. These steps reduce friction for mature and part-time learners, and help students who are not UK domiciled understand what good work looks like.
Exam Construction?
Well-constructed exams test capability without surprising students. In Business and Management, students question exams when scope or question types do not match intended learning, even when the format feels manageable.
Create fairer, more useful exams with a balanced mix of multiple-choice questions, short problems, essays, and case analysis. This allows you to assess both theoretical knowledge and practical application, while clear guidance on permitted resources and referencing reinforces transparency.
Marker calibration improves consistency just as much as exam design. Use 2–3 anonymised exemplars at grade boundaries and record moderation notes. For larger cohorts, apply targeted double-marking where variance is highest. A short post-assessment debrief on common strengths and issues can also improve perceived fairness before individual marks are released.
Module Content?
Within each Business and Management module, content selection should build applied capability, not just coverage. When teaching lacks depth or assessment relies on narrow formats, students struggle to demonstrate what they know in ways that feel meaningful. Combining structured quizzes with case studies, presentations, or reflective pieces promotes critical application and retention, provided the mix maps to learning outcomes.
Programme-level coordination matters too. A shared assessment calendar and brief cross-module mapping reduce duplication, prevent deadline pile-ups, and support workload equity across the cohort.
Assessment & Evaluation?
Assessment methods show students what “good” looks like. When criteria feel opaque, evaluation can seem like guesswork rather than judgement. Given business students’ concerns about Assessment methods and Marking criteria, and what business studies students say about marking criteria, publish annotated exemplars aligned to the rubric and explain weightings and common pitfalls in the brief.
Review restrictive word counts or timings where they prevent students from demonstrating outcomes. Incorporate more authentic tasks, such as projects, pitches, or viva-style components, with asynchronous options where needed. Use text analytics to spot recurring misunderstandings, refine the brief or marking guidance, and close the loop with a concise debrief.
Group Work?
Group projects can prepare students for real business environments, but only when contribution and grading feel fair. Standardise roles in briefs, use light-touch contribution tracking and peer evaluation, following group work assessment best practice, and include a small individual component, such as a reflection or artefact, to preserve parity. Offer asynchronous alternatives for oral components where needed so collaborative skills can be assessed without excluding parts of the cohort.
COVID-19 Impact?
The pandemic normalised online and open-book assessment, and expanded the use of coursework and virtual presentations. The main takeaway is to keep the flexibility that worked: clear guidance, staged feedback, and formats that reduce unnecessary barriers. Address integrity and access with short orientation on assessment formats, academic integrity, and referencing, then build accessibility in from the start through alternative formats and captioned or oral options.
Coursework Relevancy?
Relevant coursework sustains motivation because students can see the point of the task. Align coursework tightly to real-world business scenarios by using live or realistic datasets, concise client-style briefs, and collaborative tasks that mirror professional practice. Student surveys and post-assessment debriefs should inform iterative refinement so tasks stay current with industry expectations.
Content Delivery?
Content delivery shapes how manageable assessment feels. Lengthy lectures, whether online or in person, can dilute engagement and make expectations easier to miss. Blend delivery with interactive case work, short quizzes, and discussion. Keep a single source of truth for assessment information in the VLE, use predictable update rhythms so students can plan, and invite quick feedback on delivery and assessment load so teams can act promptly on recurring themes.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
If you want to move from anecdotal complaints to targeted assessment improvement, Student Voice Analytics helps you:
- Pinpoint where assessment clarity, parity, and flexibility issues are concentrated in Business and Management by segment (age, mode, domicile/ethnicity, disability).
- Track sentiment over time and share concise, anonymised summaries with programme and module teams to calibrate briefs, rubrics, and marking.
- Benchmark against the wider sector and discipline peers, giving you evidence for internal quality processes and external audiences, including NSS-related action planning.
- Export tables and summaries for boards and reviews, and support like-for-like comparisons by subject mix and cohort profile so operational fixes can be tied to measurable gains.
Request a walkthrough
Book a free Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and reporting designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
- All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
- Versioned outputs with TEF-ready reporting.
- Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
UK-hosted · No public LLM APIs · Same-day turnaround
Related Entries
- Group work assessment best practice
- Do business studies assessment methods work for students?
- Can better scheduling lift outcomes in business programmes?
- Do business studies students trust marking criteria?
- How can feedback be improved in business and management studies?