A reading pathway
Closing the feedback loop
What should happen between hearing a concern and reporting a response?
A feedback loop needs more than a summary. Someone needs to consider the evidence, decide what can happen, take responsibility and explain the response to students. The next review should revisit the experience that prompted the decision.
A useful starting point
Use these readings to trace one issue through your own process. Distinguish what was heard, what was decided, what has happened and what still needs checking. That gives students and colleagues a shared account of progress without turning an action log into a claim that the problem is solved.
- Name the decision, action owner and review date.
- Explain constraints and unresolved requests alongside completed actions.
- Check that students can find and understand the response.
Read with a purpose
Selected reading, in a useful order.
Research briefings examine a particular study. Sector Watch articles describe developments and reported practice. The guides explain methods and working processes.
Resource
What is student voice in higher education?
Start with a practical sequence from asking a question to revisiting the response.
Sector Watch
Jisc survey guidance connects student comments with decisions
Connect survey exports and interpretation with named actions.
Sector Watch
Middlesex student charter commits to visible action on feedback
Consider how institutional commitments can assign responsibility across a partnership.
Sector Watch
QAA compassionate communication report puts student feedback into message design
Explore student involvement in clearer institutional messages and the processes behind them.
Teaching Practice
How can university facilities support politics students?
Connect facilities feedback with a named service owner and a check on the original task.
Connect the reading to your own work.
Choose one issue, identify the people who can act on it and agree how students will help interpret the evidence. Keep the original question and context with any comments you use.
- Explore the relevant public evidence or category framework
- Plan access, review and reporting arrangements
- Follow a comment through the worked example
If you need support analysing your institution’s comments, connect comment analysis with follow-up.