Respect the survey context
Retain the question, study level and collection period with the analysis. Use categories appropriate to the taught or research experience.
Solution
Organise PTES and PRES comments around the experiences each survey addresses, from assessment and community to supervision and research culture.
Student Voice Analytics supports postgraduate comment analysis with a scope and category framework agreed for the survey. Keep taught and research experiences distinct while preparing outputs colleagues can use.
Discuss the source data, reporting question, outputs and delivery window.
Postgraduate education leads, graduate schools, survey teams, and quality teams.
Postgraduate feedback reaches several teams: programme staff, supervisors, graduate schools and professional services. The report needs to preserve the experience described and make responsibility for the next discussion clear.
Retain the question, study level and collection period with the analysis. Use categories appropriate to the taught or research experience.
Agree which programme, school or service views are useful and appropriate for the supplied data.
Give the responsible team a clear account of the topic, the supporting evidence and the question to investigate.
Keep the surveys identifiable and interpret each in its own context. Agree any cross-survey reporting question before combining outputs.
Discuss the population and intended audience when agreeing scope. Choose an appropriate reporting level and example-sharing approach with your institution.
The resources library includes the postgraduate research comment framework and a curated postgraduate reading pathway.
Discuss the source data, reporting question and outputs your team needs. Explore the worked example before agreeing the scope and delivery window.
Discuss your survey