How do pharmacy students rate their learning resources?

learning resourcespharmacy

Pharmacy students rate learning resources positively overall but highlight gaps in accessibility and operational delivery that shape study quality. Across the National Student Survey (NSS), the learning resources category records 67.7% positive comments (index +33.6) with a −7.4 point accessibility gap for disabled students; within pharmacy, sentiment is more mixed, with 55.6% positive and pressure points around timetabling and placement logistics. These sector patterns shape the themes below and inform how programmes prioritise access, quality and flexibility.

We examine pharmacy students’ day‑to‑day use of resources via text analysis of student surveys, focusing on how availability, quality and format support learning in a demanding, professionally regulated programme. The aim is to show where students say resources work well and where specific fixes improve their experience.

Are learning resources available when pharmacy students need them?

Students highlight the need for fast, dependable access to online library databases, the VLE (Moodle, Canvas), lecture capture, past papers and lab materials. Ready access to specialist guides such as the BNF and OTP matters for applied study. Survey comments consistently flag that simplifying off‑campus authentication, signposting essential systems in one place, and keeping links current reduces friction. Embedding accessibility from the start—alternative formats, assistive tech routes, and a prompt fix pathway—addresses the recurring gap disabled students report.

How good are the learning resources?

Well‑structured lecture notes, slides and guides help students grasp complex concepts. Students respond best to logically sequenced materials that scaffold learning within and across modules, with examples that show application to practice. Acting on student feedback at module review and sharing exemplars and checklists for core topics strengthens alignment between intended learning outcomes and resources.

Does flexible access make study more sustainable?

Recorded and pre‑recorded lectures, online labs and asynchronous discussion spaces let students pace their study around placement blocks, commuting, caring or work. Flexible access patterns also align with what mature and part‑time students often report as helpful. Where staff publish availability windows and stick to predictable release schedules, cohorts report higher satisfaction and less duplication of effort when preparing for assessments.

How well do resources support practical application?

Case studies, workshops and patient scenarios connect theory to professional tasks in clinical and community settings. Students value resources that bundle protocols, exemplars and checklists alongside sessions, so they can practise safely and reflect afterwards. Feeding quick, structured student reflections from placements into resource updates keeps materials relevant to emerging practice and supports readiness for Oriel preparation.

What support and guidance do students receive?

Academic mentors and tutors help students navigate complex content and prepare for professional assessment, while IT services keep VLE and software access stable. Students frequently note the responsiveness and expertise of teaching staff; consolidating this support with concise how‑to guides and targeted drop‑ins at assessment pinch points reduces avoidable queries and helps cohorts focus on learning.

Does the course structure and materials scaffold learning effectively?

Curricula that move from foundational pharmaceutical science to advanced clinical application work best when each stage has resource “readiness checks” before term start. Pharmacy students separate overall programme management from week‑to‑week mechanics, and timetabling instability undermines study planning; in sector‑level pharmacy feedback, scheduling/timetabling carries a sentiment of −35.1. Naming an owner for resource and timetable updates, and issuing brief weekly “what changed and why” notes, keeps students oriented and limits knock‑on effects.

What lasting effects has COVID-19 had on pharmacy study?

The rapid shift to digital teaching established recorded content, online labs and remote access as baseline expectations. Students now expect hybrid provision to be intentional: up‑to‑date recordings, captioning, and integrated practical resources. Institutions strengthen resilience by maintaining robust IT infrastructure, consistent module‑level resource hubs, and live support during assessment peaks.

How Student Voice Analytics helps you

Student Voice Analytics turns open‑text survey comments into actionable insight for pharmacy and for learning resources. You can track topic volume and sentiment over time, compare like‑for‑like across programmes and demographics, and drill from institution to school, course and cohort. Exportable summaries enable programme and service teams to prioritise accessibility fixes, resource readiness checks and communications around timetabling, placements and assessment—showing students what changed and demonstrating progress.

Request a walkthrough

Book a Student Voice Analytics demo

See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.

• All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
• Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
• Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.

Book a demo Prefer email? [email protected]

More posts on learning resources:

• Do marketing students have the learning resources they need?
• Are biomedical sciences students getting the learning resources they need?
• Do physiotherapy students have the learning resources they need?
• What do UK anthropology students need from learning resources?

More posts on pharmacy student views:

• What do UK pharmacy students say about course content and design?
• How do UK pharmacy students view assessment methods?
• Does better staff–student communication improve pharmacy students’ experience?
• What do pharmacy students say about their teaching staff?