Do fieldwork and placements improve history education?

Published Mar 28, 2024 · Updated Oct 12, 2025

placements fieldwork tripshistory

Yes. Embedded fieldwork and placements lift engagement and make history degrees more applied, provided they are equitable and well scheduled. In the National Student Survey (NSS, the UK‑wide student satisfaction survey), the placements fieldwork trips theme captures cross‑sector experience: 60.6% of comments are positive, but tone varies by life stage (young students score +28.0) and mode (apprenticeships sit near neutral at +3.0). Within History, the discipline classification used across UK higher education, placements and fieldwork surface in only 0.3% of comments, so departments that expand access and lock in logistics early differentiate their offer while addressing equity gaps for Black students (+8.1).

One of the most pressing issues facing history students in the UK today is the noticeable scarcity of field trips and study abroad opportunities. This situation raises questions about the impact of tuition fees and the availability of local opportunities on students' perceptions of the value for money regarding their education. Furthermore, the student surveys indicate a clear desire for more of these experiential learning opportunities, which are seen as important for a comprehensive understanding of historical contexts. Integrating practical experiences like fieldwork trips into the curriculum is hampered by financial constraints and logistical challenges, which can limit students' exposure to hands-on learning outside the classroom. This limitation on opportunities to explore historical sites or engage in international study programmes directly impacts students' ability to appreciate the global context of historical events. Staff and institutions should prioritise practical steps: lock in logistics early (including site capacity) before timetabling, publish brief weekly “what changed and why” updates, and use rota freeze windows ahead of each block. Partnerships with local historical societies or museums can make fieldwork more accessible and affordable.

What happens when field trips and study abroad opportunities are scarce?

Lack of trips reduces perceived value and weakens students’ sense of relevance. It also narrows routes for those who cannot travel far or commit to extended time away from campus. Where international options are constrained, universities can design local alternatives that still enable authentic source work (archives, museums, community heritage projects) and provide transparent selection and funding processes so students understand opportunities and trade‑offs.

How equitable are placement opportunities?

Many students face avoidable barriers: distance to sites, short notice, and travel costs. Equity requires designing for non‑standard modes and circumstances, not retrofitting later. Ring‑fence flexible options for part‑time and apprenticeship students, schedule proactive check‑ins for cohorts who report lower sentiment, pre‑agree reasonable adjustments with providers, and subsidise travel where possible. Offer a wider variety of locations, publish selection windows well in advance, and provide a one‑page mentor brief plus a simple onboarding checklist so every student starts on equal footing.

What do extracurricular fieldwork and placements add?

Placements and field trips extend learning beyond lectures: handling documents and artefacts, observing interpretive practice, and contributing to live projects. Students develop analytical, communication and teamwork skills in authentic settings, which in turn strengthens confidence and cohort belonging. These experiences create concrete examples for applications and interviews, making the pathway from module to workplace easier to articulate.

How do placements and fieldwork bridge humanities study and work?

They translate historical methods into roles across museums, archives, cultural organisations and education, while signalling transferable skills valued elsewhere (analysis, synthesis, evidencing, public engagement). Given that careers guidance/support often underperforms in History relative to the sector, embed employer‑linked briefs, alumni Q&As and short micro‑placements in core modules so every student sees how their skills travel.

How should assignments be balanced with placement workload?

When placements run, competing deadlines can dilute both academic and workplace learning. Align assessment to placement outputs, reduce duplication, and make expectations explicit. Provide annotated exemplars, checklist‑style rubrics and plain‑English marking criteria, and commit to realistic feedback turnaround so students can apply guidance while still on placement. This approach reduces uncertainty and keeps wellbeing in view.

Can varied course offerings and practical experiences enrich study for all?

Yes, especially when option choice is transparent and supported. History students respond well to strong teaching and rich module choice, so map options to learning outcomes and provide concise overviews or sample materials to aid selection. Pair option range with practical routes (local archives, digital humanities sprints, heritage consultancy briefs) to ensure every pathway offers applied engagement, not just a select few modules.

How should the history curriculum change to embed practical learning?

Treat fieldwork and placements as integral, not extras. Build them into programme design with equitable access, transparent selection, and pre‑agreed adjustments. Operationalise quality through mentor readiness, expected contact rhythms, and a rapid issue loop: capture on‑placement concerns via a micro‑form, triage within 48 hours, and publish weekly closure rates by theme. Use “what changed and why” updates to maintain trust, and ensure study abroad schemes are transparent and fair.

What should institutions do next?

Prioritise equitable access, predictable logistics, and assessment alignment. Diversify site options, fund travel where needed, and make support visible to cohorts who experience lower sentiment. Strengthen the academic core—teaching quality, module choice—while expanding authentic, locally deliverable practical experiences so all students benefit, not just those with time and resources to travel.

How Student Voice Analytics helps you

• Track placements, fieldwork and trips continuously, with drill‑downs by mode, age, ethnicity, disability and discipline, so you see where experience is uneven and why.
• Benchmark History against the wider sector and other CAH codes, then target high‑impact themes such as Feedback, Marking criteria, logistics and student support.
• Produce concise, anonymised summaries for placement partners and programme teams, with export‑ready tables for briefing and action planning.
• Evidence change over time with like‑for‑like comparisons by cohort, site/provider and year, demonstrating how operational fixes improve student sentiment.

Request a walkthrough

Book a Student Voice Analytics demo

See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.

• All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
• Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
• Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.

Book a demo Prefer email? [email protected]

More posts on placements fieldwork trips:

• Do medical placements deliver for students?
• Do fieldwork and placements enhance geography learning?
• What strengthens placements in health sciences education?
• Does fieldwork enhance learning in ecology and environmental biology?

More posts on history student views:

• What do UK history students say about teaching delivery?
• Do structured collaborations improve learning for history students?
• Do history students benefit from clearer assessment methods?
• Do history degrees build personal development?