Are marketing students satisfied with how teaching is delivered?
Yes, although the experience is uneven: National Student Survey (NSS) open‑text evidence shows marketing sits close to neutral on Delivery of teaching with a sentiment index of +1.5, compared with the wider category’s +23.9 across 20,505 comments. Students commend access to supportive teaching staff and career guidance, yet feel less confident about delivery structure and assessment clarity; marking criteria is a particular weak point (−52.1) while career guidance/support is a strong positive (+44.1). As part of the UK subject taxonomy, Marketing provides a focused view of discipline‑specific patterns, while the delivery lens captures how cohorts judge classroom and digital teaching across the sector.
What do marketing students say about teaching quality and engagement?
Students respond well to knowledgeable, approachable staff and purposeful session design. Harness that strength by spreading effective habits: a light delivery rubric covering structure, clarity, pacing and interaction; short peer observations; and micro‑exemplars that demonstrate what works in practice. Blend theory with frequent low‑stakes application, short formative checks and worked examples to sustain engagement across the cohort and reduce cognitive load.
How has the shift to online learning changed delivery?
Students value flexibility but notice inconsistency in online structure, materials and interaction. Set a digital baseline: timely recordings, consistent slide templates, a single platform, and concise session summaries with signposting to “what to do next.” Provide asynchronous assessment briefings and Q&A to support part‑time, commuter and international students, while retaining live interaction that keeps seminars lively and dialogic.
Where does practical experience add most value?
Practical tasks make learning stick and align with how students expect to prepare for marketing roles. Use live briefs, simulations and project‑based assessments, and make the connection to real‑world outcomes explicit. Continue to draw on alumni and employer touchpoints, and make the benefits visible so students see how classroom work translates into professional practice.
How should group work and peer discussions be designed?
Collaboration supports deeper learning when it is structured for fairness and accountability. Use contribution logs, interim check‑ins and brief peer‑review moments. Balance group outputs with individual components so grades reflect both teamwork and personal contribution. Case‑based discussions grounded in current market data help students practise analysis and strategy in realistic conditions.
How should staff manage feedback and expectations?
Assessment clarity determines confidence. Address marking criteria head‑on with annotated exemplars across grade bands and a concise checklist rubric that maps criteria to visible hallmarks of quality. Calibrate markers through short norming exercises. Set a realistic feedback service level and publish actual turnaround times. Maintain a single source of truth for course communications with a brief weekly update that notes what changed and why.
How can programmes address accessibility barriers?
Design assumes diverse needs. Make materials accessible by default (captions, transcripts, readable slides, alternative formats) and use straightforward language. For returning or mature learners, start topics with quick refreshers that connect to prior knowledge and provide explicit next steps after each session. Offer flexible routes to engage with assessment briefings and exemplars so students can revisit guidance when it suits their schedules.
What should programmes do next to enhance delivery?
- Close the part‑time parity gap with reliable recordings, structured slides and easy‑to‑reference assessment briefings.
- Support mature learners through concrete, practice‑first examples before abstraction and explicit signposting after sessions.
- Lift clarity with step‑by‑step worked examples, pacing breaks and standardised terminology across modules.
- Amplify what works by borrowing techniques from high‑performing sessions and sharing short micro‑exemplars through peer learning.
- Keep a simple feedback loop: run pulse checks after key teaching blocks, review results with programme teams, and track shifts by mode and age.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
- Measure topic and sentiment over time for delivery, with drill‑downs from provider to school, department and programme.
- Benchmark like‑for‑like across disciplines and demographics, including mode, age, domicile and campus/site.
- Surface concise, anonymised summaries and representative comments that programme teams can act on quickly.
- Produce export‑ready outputs for boards, NSS action planning and TEF narratives, keeping priorities focused and progress visible.
Request a walkthrough
Book a Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
- All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
- Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
- Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
More posts on delivery of teaching:
- What does student feedback say about delivering teaching in business and management?
- What strengthens teaching delivery in Information Systems?
- What do Media Studies students say about teaching delivery?
- What does student feedback tell us about teaching psychology at university?