What do management students say about working with peers?
Management students report that collaboration works when it is structured, assessable and easy to organise, and falters when logistics and fairness get in the way. In the National Student Survey (NSS), Opportunities to work with other students captures how UK programmes enable peer work and draws 7,331 comments with 46.3% Positive sentiment. The subject grouping for management studies shows a comparable pattern: the collaboration topic takes 4.9% of comments and carries a sentiment index of −9.9. These sector touchpoints guide where to act, including responding to the +22.7 index point gap between full‑time and part‑time learners that highlights timetabling constraints.
Where does group work break down?
Free‑riding, uneven contribution and unresolved conflict undermine engagement and learning. Staff mitigate this by setting explicit roles, milestones and contribution expectations, and by using light peer‑assessment or contribution checks to increase accountability. Publishing working norms and giving students a route to escalate issues reduces attrition and improves outcomes. Analysing open‑text feedback helps teams see whether these measures deter free‑riding and where further adjustments are needed.
How does collaboration apply to management careers?
Team projects simulate workplace practice and build communication, negotiation and coordination skills that employers value. Students benefit most when group tasks have real clients or live briefs, clear deliverables and time‑boxed stages, so they can practise project management and reflection. Diverse cohorts deepen learning if programmes scaffold inclusive teamwork and provide explicit support for those juggling work, caring or commuting commitments.
How should course design and assessment balance group and individual work?
A mixed assessment diet evidences both collaborative and individual capability. Programmes that combine group artefacts with individual reflections or vivas, and that publish rubrics and contribution policies in advance, tend to avoid fairness disputes. Staff calibrate across markers and use exemplars so students can interpret assessment briefs, understand marking criteria and act on feedback. Ongoing analysis of student comments guides iterative redesign at module level.
What supports sustain student engagement in peer work?
Reducing friction sustains participation. Pre‑provisioned digital spaces per group, templates for charters and meeting notes, and simple contribution logs cut coordination time. Asynchronous routes, evening collaboration windows and cross‑cohort matching tools help time‑poor and off‑pattern learners participate. Accessible materials, hybrid‑ready rooms and short micro‑skills on conflict resolution, delegation and decision‑making make inclusion visible.
What course changes do students suggest?
Students ask for a more balanced weighting between team outputs and individual components, clearer guidance on managing group dynamics and transparent ways to recognise differential contribution. Short workshops on teamwork techniques, early diagnostics to form balanced groups and a concise escalation pathway address the most cited pain points without over‑engineering the process.
What does effective teamwork develop?
Well‑designed teamwork builds leadership, planning and problem‑solving, and allows students to apply management theory in practice. Structured collaboration exposes learners to alternative perspectives, strengthens critical thinking and supports more confident decision‑making. Staff who facilitate rather than micromanage help cohorts become self‑regulating and reflective.
How should course management and administration enable collaboration?
Course teams improve experience by forming groups intentionally, stabilising timetabling, and communicating changes with ownership and rationale. Consistent grading approaches for group work, with visible criteria for contribution and mechanisms to adjust individual marks, address fairness concerns. Digital tools that integrate announcements, scheduling and document sharing reduce administrative load for students and staff.
What do student feedback and expectations imply for group work?
Students value purposeful collaboration and expect clarity on standards, contribution and support routes. Providers that test designs in early modules, gather targeted feedback and publish what changed and why show responsiveness and build trust. This approach turns group work from a compliance task into a learning community asset.
What do students generally experience in collaborative learning?
Cohorts report richer learning when collaboration is designed‑in through studios, labs or project sprints and supported by accessible spaces and staff presence. Where opportunities are ad hoc or hard to organise, students disengage and perceive limited value. Embedding structured collaboration across modules and years sustains momentum and normalises effective peer learning.
What should providers take forward?
Make collaboration the default in programme design, reduce friction with pre‑built resources and accountability, and design for mature, part‑time and commuter students as standard. Align assessment, marking and feedback practices with these designs so that group work evidences both team and individual learning.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
Student Voice Analytics surfaces the tone and volume of collaboration comments over time, segmented by school, cohort and demographics, so teams can target the friction points that matter for management students. It benchmarks like‑for‑like against subject peers and student segments, highlights gaps for mature and part‑time learners, and produces concise briefings for programme teams and quality reviews. Export‑ready outputs make it straightforward to evidence change and share progress with boards and external partners.
Request a walkthrough
Book a Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
- All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
- Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
- Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
More posts on opportunities to work with other students:
- Do physical geographical sciences students get good opportunities to work with other students?
- Can collaborative learning work for medical students?
- Do business studies students benefit from structured opportunities to work with peers?
- Do sociology students get meaningful opportunities to work with peers?