What does good delivery of teaching look like in UK nursing education?
Published May 14, 2024 · Updated Oct 12, 2025
delivery of teachingnursing (non-specific)Strong delivery in UK nursing combines structured, well-communicated teaching with predictable practice exposure and a steady operational rhythm. Across the National Student Survey (NSS) open-text analysis for delivery of teaching, sentiment is broadly positive, with 60.2% Positive and 36.3% Negative (index +23.9). Within nursing (non-specific), which groups core nursing programmes in UK subject coding, students rate delivery itself positively (+25.3) but register severe dips around communication about the course (−46.3). These patterns shape the choices providers make about curriculum, technology, support and placements in nursing.
How should curriculum design and delivery respond to student feedback?
In the UK, the design and delivery of the nursing curriculum set the trajectory for students’ readiness to practise. A balanced curriculum integrates essential theoretical knowledge with hands-on clinical experiences, and the two need tight alignment to develop critical thinking and clinical judgement. Use student voice to tune delivery: standardise session structure, pacing and interaction; open with short refreshers that connect to prior knowledge; and signpost “what to do next” after each class. Worked examples and micro-exemplars support clarity across cohorts. Parity for part-time and commuting learners matters, so programmes should publish core materials early and make assessment briefings easy to reference asynchronously. Regular pulse checks help programme teams prioritise changes that move sentiment for specific cohorts.
How should technology enhance delivery rather than replace it?
Digital tools, including recordings, virtual simulations and online platforms, now sit alongside face-to-face teaching and clinical practice. They work best when they extend access and reinforce core concepts without displacing interpersonal learning. Provide reliable recordings, clear slide decks and timely release of materials; chunk longer sessions and add concise summaries so students can revisit complex content. Address digital access gaps proactively and ensure that remote provision mirrors in-person briefings for assessment, safety and professionalism. Technology should scaffold judgement, not substitute for supervised practice.
What student support best sustains learning and wellbeing?
People-centred support underpins persistence on demanding programmes. Visible, proactive personal tutoring and responsive student support services help students navigate workload, placement pressures and life commitments. Embed wellbeing within modules through taught sessions on stress management and reflective practice, aligned to professional standards. Schedule support so it complements clinical blocks, and signpost the Library and academic skills provision as part of each module, not as an optional extra. Routine evaluation of these supports ensures they remain targeted and effective.
How do we make practical training and placements reliable learning experiences?
Clinical exposure translates theory into practice, yet variability in placement quality and logistics undermines confidence. Treat placements as a designed service: confirm capacity early, keep a single source of truth for schedules and changes, and set simple expectations for supervision and feedback. Short, structured check-ins during placement blocks help surface and resolve issues quickly. Co-designed evaluation with students and practice partners improves predictability and strengthens the link between learning outcomes, skills development and assessment.
How should assessment and evaluation drive progress?
Assessment should evidence competence while guiding improvement. Objective Structured Clinical Examinations provide authentic, observable performance, complemented by clear marking criteria and annotated exemplars that show what good looks like. Feedback needs to be specific, usable and timely, with feedforward actions integrated into subsequent teaching. Programme teams should use data from assessments to refine content and delivery, and close the loop with students on what changed and why.
Where do students still struggle with delivery?
Students report that gaps in communication and programme organisation erode trust and make demanding study harder to manage. Reducing noise matters: name ownership for timetabling, maintain a single authoritative channel for programme communications, and publish brief weekly updates on changes. In learning design, ensure conceptual scaffolding and practical application are foregrounded, particularly for mature and part-time learners who often balance complex commitments. Remote learning works when it augments, not replaces, dialogue, practice and belonging.
What should providers prioritise next?
Prioritise four moves: align theory and practice with consistent delivery standards across modules; secure placements as a predictable learning service; default to assessment clarity; and keep a tight operational rhythm for communications and timetabling. These actions address the strongest positive and negative drivers reported by nursing students and align with sector patterns on delivery. Sustained, transparent use of student voice will keep programmes adaptive and practice-ready.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
- Measure topic and sentiment over time for delivery of teaching and nursing, with drill-downs from provider to school and programme.
- Compare like-for-like across subject families and demographics, segmenting by mode, age, campus/site and year to target where sentiment will shift most.
- Provide concise, anonymised summaries and representative comments so programme teams and practice partners can act without trawling thousands of responses.
- Export-ready outputs for boards and committees support rapid briefing and visible follow-through on actions.
Request a walkthrough
Book a Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
-
All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
-
Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
-
Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
More posts on delivery of teaching:
More posts on nursing (non-specific) student views: