What drives student views of teaching staff in nursing?
By Student Voice Analytics
teaching staffnursing (non-specific)Students rate nursing teaching teams highly when staff are visible, responsive and predictable, but sentiment also hinges on communication and placements. Across the Teaching Staff theme in the National Student Survey (NSS, the annual UK survey of final‑year undergraduates), 78.3% of comments are positive (sentiment index +52.8). Within nursing (non‑specific), tone about teaching staff remains favourable (+21.6) even as placements account for 17.0% of comments and communication about the course attracts the most negative responses (−46.3). These patterns shape how students experience teaching, assessment and support in nursing.
How strong is the quality of teaching?
In nursing education, dedicated educators with current clinical insight set a strong baseline for student confidence and engagement. Students respond to coherent structure, accessible tutors and predictable touchpoints. Teams that make expectations transparent and maintain simple service habits sustain trust. Small disciplines such as weekly “what to expect” updates, timely responses and visible office hours help students organise learning around clinical demands. Programme leaders should track experiences across cohorts and sites to ensure consistency of interactions within teaching teams.
How should assessment and feedback work in nursing?
Assessment needs to mirror practice and make standards explicit. Students benefit most from annotated exemplars, transparent marking criteria, and feedback that connects directly to next steps on clinical competence. Staff should align assessment briefs and marking criteria across modules to reduce ambiguity, provide realistic turnaround commitments, and use short, actionable feedback that students can implement before the next assessment point.
Where do communication and staff turnover undermine learning?
Inconsistent course communications generate uncertainty about timetabling, placement logistics and assessment windows. Nursing students report communication as a particular pain point, so programmes should maintain a single source of truth for updates, name ownership for programme operations, and publish short weekly notes on what changed and why. High staff turnover compounds the problem by disrupting continuity. Programme teams can mitigate disruption by standardising core processes and ensuring students encounter consistent messages and approaches across the teaching team.
What impact do placements have on learning?
Placements bridge theory and practice and dominate the nursing student experience. They work best when designed as a service with clear capacity planning, early confirmations, and reliable routes for feedback while on placement. Teaching staff can enrich learning by explicitly linking placement activity to classroom content and by checking in on what students can apply, not just what they observe. Where supervision is stretched, students miss learning opportunities and confidence dips, so programmes should confirm responsibilities with placement partners and schedule escalation points.
What support structures and environments help nursing students thrive?
People-centred support stands out. Personal Tutors and student support services provide stable, confidence-building contact that complements clinical learning, especially at assessment crunch points and during placements. Staff who signal availability and empathise with the pressures of practice help students maintain wellbeing and persistence. Institutions should invest in staff development for inclusive advising, and retain visible signposting to academic skills and the library, which students view as a strong resource.
Which digital and learning resources make the biggest difference?
Digital tools extend access and repetition. Simulation software, short video demonstrations and replayable skills content enable practice outside labs, while online Q&A and curated resource lists help students navigate heavy workloads. For part-time and commuting cohorts, asynchronous channels and timely summaries ensure parity of access. Staff should test usability with students and iterate resources based on quick pulse feedback, so digital provision supports rather than complicates learning.
What should institutions prioritise now?
- Treat placements as designed services with early confirmations, transparent changes and agreed feedback routines.
- Tighten operational rhythm: one source of truth for course information, named responsibility for timetabling and programme updates, and predictable contact windows.
- Make assessment clarity the default: shared marking criteria, exemplars and feedback that drives the next attempt.
- Protect what students value: approachable teaching teams and visible Personal Tutors who connect academic and practice learning.
- Monitor experiences by cohort and site and close the feedback loop termly so students see what changed.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
Student Voice Analytics translates nursing student comments into actionable insight. It tracks Teaching Staff sentiment over time, compares nursing with the wider discipline set, and pinpoints where communication, organisation and placements suppress or lift student experience. You can drill from provider to programme and cohort, segment by mode or site, and export concise briefings for quality boards and partner meetings. The platform helps teams prioritise quick wins on delivery and sustain the people-centred strengths that nursing students value.
Request a walkthrough
Book a Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
-
All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
-
Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
-
Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
More posts on teaching staff:
More posts on nursing (non-specific) student views: