Yes. Across the National Student Survey (NSS) open-text analysis, students are broadly positive about Learning resources, and mathematics follows this pattern while flagging specific fixes. The category covers physical and digital access to materials, equipment and study spaces; 14,058 comments show 67.7% Positive sentiment (index +33.6). In mathematics, learning resources take an 8.3% share of all comments with a positive index of +23.8, yet IT facilities trend negative (−25.2). Disabled students’ tone trails peers by −7.4 points (+28.1 vs +35.5), so accessibility and reliability shape the recommendations below.
Understanding the preferences and challenges that mathematics students in UK higher education face improves their learning experiences. Learning resources shape how students grasp complex concepts, from textbooks and online materials to interactive software. Using student surveys and text analysis, staff can tailor provision to cohort needs and prioritise inclusive access. The sections below consider lecture notes, platforms, and specialist software, focusing on accessibility and the impact on learning outcomes.
What blend of digital and traditional resources works for mathematics?
Digital resources such as e-books and interactive simulations provide immediacy and interactivity for visualising complex theories and procedures. Adaptive tools can personalise pace and level of challenge.
Traditional tools like printed textbooks remain valued for reliability, annotation and quick reference during problem-solving. They also avoid connectivity constraints.
Given recurring issues with IT facilities, programmes should promote a hybrid model and verify capacity and compatibility before term starts. Pair the mix with single-location signposting for core platforms and short quick-start guides at the start of each module. This reduces friction and supports an inclusive, resilient approach.
How should lecture notes and handouts support mathematical learning?
Lecture notes and handouts help students grasp complex theories and methods. For mathematics, where the content is dense and problem-led, structured notes with solved problems, explanations and practice tasks aid revision and consolidation.
To promote independence, staff can provide modular handouts with space for student annotations and questions. Aligning notes and worked examples with assessment briefs and marking criteria also reduces confusion later in the module. This balance supports deeper engagement while maintaining a clear line of sight to assessment.
Which online platforms and collaborative tools work for maths cohorts?
Platforms such as Moodle organise materials and deadlines; collaborative tools such as Google Docs enable real-time work on problem sets. Their effectiveness depends on implementation. Provide a single route to core links, simplify off-campus access steps with plain-language instructions and screenshots, and set service hours that match peak assessment periods. These practices lift engagement and reduce avoidable support demand when remote access is required.
How should programmes use mathematical software and tools?
Specialist tools (e.g., MATLAB, Mathematica) and graphing calculators are integral in visualising and solving complex problems. Programmes should provide access and training, and publish simple setup checks, device guidance and software access guides. Balance software use with foundational techniques in taught sessions and assessment, so students understand underlying principles as well as toolchains.
How do we make learning resources accessible and inclusive?
Accessibility and inclusivity need systematic attention, especially for mathematical notation and diagrams.
These steps close known gaps for disabled and off-campus students and ensure equitable access to core learning.
What role do peer support and study groups play?
Peer study strengthens problem-solving and exposes students to diverse methods. To make groups effective, staff can train student facilitators, provide guidance on collaborative techniques, and offer quiet spaces for group work. Aligning peer activity with module objectives ensures it complements formal teaching.
How do feedback loops improve resource quality?
Collecting and acting on student feedback sustains improvement. Analyse comments to identify recurrent pain points (e.g., access paths, reliability, navigation) and publish short updates on what changed and why. Closing the loop builds trust and ensures resources stay aligned with cohort needs across the academic year.
What should programmes do next?
Adopt a hybrid provision of digital and traditional resources, verify specialist software access ahead of term, and maintain a single source of truth for links and guidance. Prioritise accessibility-by-default, support students with straightforward quick-start guides, and name an owner for resource readiness in mathematics who issues brief weekly updates during peak periods. These moves improve reliability and inclusivity without diluting mathematical rigour.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
Request a walkthrough
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
© Student Voice Systems Limited, All rights reserved.