What will most improve delivery of teaching in biosciences?
By Student Voice Analytics
delivery of teachingbiosciences (non-specific)Prioritise parity in delivery and transparent assessment. In the National Student Survey (NSS), delivery of teaching captures students’ judgements on structure, clarity, pacing and interaction, and across UK higher education it trends positive (60.2% Positive, 36.3% Negative; index +23.9) but with a marked mode gap: full-time students sit at +27.3 versus +7.2 for part-time. Within biosciences (non-specific), which aggregates generalist bioscience programmes across the sector, students consistently praise Teaching Staff (+41.0) yet highlight opaque Marking criteria (−52.3). These patterns point to practical fixes that lift bioscience learning: consistent recordings and structured slide decks, timely release of materials for all cohorts, and unambiguous assessment briefs with exemplars.
How should delivery drive learning in biosciences?
In biosciences, where students must master complex concepts and techniques, effective delivery depends as much on how content is structured as on what is taught. Blended models that combine online tools with seminars and labs let students revisit difficult material and prepare for practical work. To close the delivery gap for diverse cohorts, teaching teams should guarantee parity across modes by providing high‑quality recordings, worked examples and concise summaries, released on a reliable schedule. Short formative checks and pacing breaks sustain attention, while light peer observation against a simple delivery rubric (structure, clarity, pacing, interaction) helps spread effective practice. Using pulse checks and text analysis to capture the student voice enables staff to pinpoint strengths and adjust quickly.
How should course content and structure evolve?
Programmes that scaffold from fundamentals to advanced topics help students build durable understanding. Integrating statistical practice and lab techniques throughout modules strengthens application. Students benefit when staff standardise slide structure and terminology across modules to reduce cognitive load, use concrete, practice‑oriented examples before abstraction, and embed quick refreshers that connect new topics to prior knowledge. Balancing digital and physical environments supports varied learning needs, while dynamic content tied to current research and professional practice keeps the curriculum relevant.
How do we embed student support and wellbeing into delivery?
Embedding support in routine teaching improves outcomes. Regular check‑ins and timely feedback identify students who may struggle, and clear signposting to “what to do next” after each session helps the cohort keep pace. Large cohorts need a designed sense of belonging; small‑group seminars and peer learning can reduce isolation. Mature and part‑time learners benefit from flexible access, explicit links to prior knowledge, and predictable timetabling that respects work and caring commitments. This approach integrates academic challenge with wellbeing.
What lasting changes from COVID-19 actually help bioscience students?
Virtual lab simulations, video demonstrations and interactive tools expand access to practical concepts when in‑person access is constrained. Rather than replicating lectures online, staff can design sessions that use short quizzes, discussion boards and structured tasks to sustain engagement. The lesson that endures is parity: align expectations, materials and opportunities for remote and in‑person students, and be explicit about how online activities connect to assessment and in‑lab work.
Which resources and technology matter most?
A well‑organised virtual learning environment such as Moodle supports different study paces and revisiting of complex topics. Lecture recordings, structured slide decks and searchable materials allow effective revision and catch‑up. Audience response tools provide real‑time feedback and prompt participation. Institutions should standardise layouts and navigation across modules, release core resources on a predictable schedule, and chunk longer recordings to aid study planning.
How should assessment and feedback work for biosciences?
Assessment design should enable students to demonstrate understanding practically as well as conceptually. Given students’ frequent concerns about marking criteria, publish annotated exemplars at each grade band, adopt checklist‑style rubrics linked to learning outcomes, and set a visible feedback service level with progress tracking. Calibration workshops help markers apply standards consistently and help students understand what “good” looks like. Digital tools can streamline submission, feedback and moderation while maintaining transparency about deadlines and any changes.
How do we deepen interaction and engagement?
Small‑group teaching, structured seminars and well‑designed lab sessions turn theory into practice. Brief formative checks guide pacing; micro‑exemplars of high‑performing sessions enable peer learning among staff. Diverse international cohorts enrich discussions; design activities that surface multiple perspectives on global scientific challenges. Text analysis of student comments can reveal which interaction patterns drive engagement so teams can replicate them across modules.
How should we use course feedback to improve?
Make feedback loops simple and visible. Run quick pulse checks after teaching blocks, segment by mode and age, and review results termly with programme teams. Focus action on delivery parity, assessment clarity and timetabling reliability. When students report pace issues, adjust with worked examples or additional practice opportunities; if labs miss intended outcomes, revise pre‑lab preparation and in‑lab guidance. Treat iteration as routine so courses remain responsive to both student need and external change.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
Student Voice Analytics tracks topic and sentiment over time for delivery, assessment and operations in biosciences, with drill‑downs from provider to department and cohort. It enables like‑for‑like comparisons across CAH subjects and student demographics, supports rapid pulse‑check analysis, and produces concise, anonymised outputs that programme teams and academic boards can act on quickly.
Request a walkthrough
Book a Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
-
All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
-
Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
-
Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
More posts on delivery of teaching:
More posts on biosciences (non-specific) student views: