How did COVID-19 change the experience of students studying ecology and environmental biology?
By Student Voice Analytics
COVID-19ecology and environmental biologyCOVID-19 reshaped student experience by depressing sentiment, constraining fieldwork access, and exposing assessment clarity gaps, while accelerating digital delivery and sustaining strong engagement with placements. In National Student Survey (NSS) open-text analyses, the COVID-19 topic records a sentiment index of −24.0 from 12,355 comments, with younger students contributing 69.4% of the volume. Within ecology and environmental biology, students consistently rate field-based learning highly (15.3% of comments focus on placements and fieldwork), but feedback quality proves a weak spot (index −35.8). In the wider sector, COVID-19 represents a cross-disciplinary lens on disruption, while ecology and environmental biology is the discipline benchmark used in UK CAH subject taxonomy for like-for-like comparisons that make these effects legible.
How did fieldwork and practical research shift?
Fieldwork sits at the heart of ecological learning, yet pandemic restrictions pushed many students towards virtual simulations and remote data collection. Simulations provide continuity and widen access, but they cannot fully reproduce ecological complexity or the authentic decision-making that develops in situ. Programmes that blend safe, small-scale in‑person sampling with well-designed virtual tasks preserve skill development and maintain momentum for students whose degree identity is tied to the outdoors.
What constrained eco‑friendly research during restrictions?
Limited access to field sites curtailed hands‑on sustainable practices. Staff and students pivoted to local green spaces, remote-sensing datasets and community‑scale projects. These choices keep research viable but narrow exposure to diverse habitats. Programmes mitigate this by redesigning projects around clear learning outcomes, rigorous risk assessments and explicit criteria for ecological impact, so that sustainability principles remain substantive rather than tokenistic.
How did the pandemic affect mental health and wellbeing?
Disrupted routines, reduced social contact and diminished access to field environments amplified stress, including eco‑anxiety. Cohorts most affected by rapid change need timely, consistent communication, reliable support routes and practical options that reconnect study with nature (for example, structured local activity). Staff who normalise check‑ins, signpost services and build supportive communities help students sustain progress alongside wellbeing.
Did environmental awareness and activism change?
Students intensified their focus on sustainability and scrutinised institutional practice. Digital platforms extended reach and collaboration but blunted the immediacy of in‑person action. Providers that channel this energy into programme design—through student‑led audits, policy debates and embedded sustainability in modules—convert activism into learning that influences institutional operations as well as curriculum.
What changed in curriculum and online learning?
Courses rapidly reconfigured modules for remote and hybrid delivery, introducing virtual laboratories, digitised identification exercises and simulated field trips. This improves flexibility and access to global datasets, yet it cannot fully substitute for ecological immersion. Programmes that pair digital assets with scheduled, safe field windows and make assessment expectations transparent—annotated exemplars, tighter rubrics, calibrated marking—address the assessment clarity gap that students report during disruption.
How did career prospects shift for ecology graduates?
Cancelled placements and constrained fieldwork limit portfolio evidence and confidence. At the same time, demand for environmental roles in policy, conservation and sustainability continues to grow, creating competition and changing skill profiles. Universities respond by brokering virtual and micro‑placements, co‑creating project briefs with employers and mapping module outputs to role requirements so students can present credible experience even when travel and access remain limited.
What lessons shape future practice?
Disruption-ready delivery becomes routine: maintain a single source of truth for changes, publish what changed and why, and protect field learning with clear allocation processes and contingency plans. Lift practice from areas that kept continuity—especially assessment clarity—and retain equitable digital provision. Keep listening: structured student‑voice cycles help teams adjust timetabling, module design and assessment briefs at pace while maintaining standards.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
Student Voice Analytics shows where COVID‑19 disruption and discipline-specific factors intersect. It tracks topic volume and sentiment over time, from institution to course level, and compares like‑for‑like across subject groupings and demographics. For ecology and environmental biology, it highlights what to protect (high‑value placements and fieldwork) and what to fix (assessment clarity, remote learning friction), generating concise, anonymised summaries you can brief to programme and quality teams and export for boards and TEF planning.
Request a walkthrough
Book a Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
-
All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
-
Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
-
Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
More posts on COVID-19:
More posts on ecology and environmental biology student views: