Are electrical and electronic engineering students getting the support they need?

By Student Voice Analytics
student supportelectrical and electronic engineering

Yes: EEE students value responsive staff and good facilities, but assessment clarity and operational consistency still limit how supported they feel. In the student support theme of National Student Survey (NSS) open‑text feedback, 68.6% of comments are positive (sentiment index 32.9). Within electrical and electronic engineering as classified under the Common Aggregation Hierarchy used across UK higher education, overall mood is more mixed at 51.2% positive. Feedback dominates EEE discussion at a 10.5% share and concerns about marking standards remain acute, with Marking criteria sentiment at −48.8. These signals shape the priorities below: unambiguous assessment design, stable operations, and visible, equitable routes to help.

Electrical and electronic engineering is a field marked by rapid technological advances and complex theoretical foundations, so support must address both academic and emotional needs. Student voice, text analysis of comments, and targeted surveys provide staff with specific, timely intelligence to adapt provision for this cohort.

How should academic support adapt to EEE’s demands?

Assessment clarity drives perceived support in EEE. Tutoring that aligns directly with assessment briefs in circuit theory, digital systems and embedded programming reduces friction and improves outcomes. Provide annotated exemplars, checklist‑style rubrics and concise grade profiles, and explain how criteria map to learning outcomes. Run light‑touch marker calibration to reduce variance between modules. Personalised mentoring remains vital for projects and exam preparation, while a consistent “front door” to advice and study skills ensures students who need structure receive it without delay. Adaptive services that scale from quick signposting to substantive one‑to‑one guidance help diverse learners excel.

Which technical resources make the most difference?

Access to modern laboratories, reliable instrumentation and up‑to‑date simulation tools underpins practical competence and confidence. Students rate facilities highly when they enable authentic practice and iterative prototyping. Pair access with short, embedded training on core software packages so early learning curves do not become barriers to engagement. Where remote or hybrid elements remain, set predictable formats and materials so students can plan lab time, preparation and follow‑up effectively.

How do we support mental health and wellbeing in a high‑pressure discipline?

EEE’s workload and pace can elevate stress. Services work best when they guarantee rapid triage and named case ownership, use accessible communications, and provide proactive follow‑ups until resolution. Normalise help‑seeking within the programme by integrating short wellbeing touchpoints at peak assessment periods and by training staff to recognise and refer early. Visible links between personal tutors and specialist teams reduce stigma and encourage timely use of support.

What does effective career guidance look like in EEE?

Students respond positively when career support is practical, timely and embedded. Offer employer‑led sessions on areas such as power systems, smart grids and embedded AI; integrate CV reviews and technical interview preparation with project milestones; and broker internships through departmental networks. Placements and site visits amplify confidence and application of theory, while alumni mentoring strengthens industry connections students can rely on.

How do peer networks strengthen learning and belonging?

Peer‑led study groups and technical societies provide both knowledge exchange and social support. Structured peer mentoring for first‑ and second‑year cohorts helps demystify assessment expectations and lab practices. Promote inclusive participation so commuter, part‑time and international students can access events and roles that build belonging alongside academic competence.

How should financial support be targeted?

Make the real costs of study explicit and provide targeted help for core expenses such as lab materials, specialist software and personal equipment. Publish simple application routes and timelines for bursaries and hardship funds. Partnerships with industry can provide scholarships, sponsored final‑year projects and paid internships that offset costs while building experience.

How should feedback drive continuous improvement?

In EEE, feedback and marking standards are the main friction points, so institutions should prioritise transparent criteria and timely, actionable commentary. Close the loop by sharing what changed and why following student input, and by monitoring time‑to‑resolution for support cases. Stabilise operational delivery through a single source of truth for timetables and changes, and minimise late adjustments. These practices reinforce trust in both academic and professional services support.

How Student Voice Analytics helps you

Student Voice Analytics turns open‑text survey comments into clear priorities you can act on. It tracks topic volume and sentiment over time, with drill‑downs from provider to school and course. You can compare like‑for‑like across CAH subject areas and student demographics, segment by cohort or site, and export concise, anonymised summaries and tables to brief programme teams and professional services without additional analysis overhead.

Request a walkthrough

Book a Student Voice Analytics demo

See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.

  • All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
  • Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
  • Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.

More posts on student support:

More posts on electrical and electronic engineering student views: