What do sport and exercise sciences students need from learning resources?
Students in sport and exercise sciences need dependable, well-maintained labs and training spaces, accessible digital platforms, and timely staff guidance, with a sharper focus on accessibility and predictable access. In the sector, learning resources gathers National Student Survey (NSS) open-text on access to materials, equipment and systems, and the pattern is positive (index +33.6 from 14,058 comments) but uneven, with disabled students’ tone (+28.1) trailing non-disabled peers (+35.5). Within sport and exercise sciences, the subject grouping that aggregates NSS feedback for this discipline, students rate general facilities strongly (+36.0), yet resource access is often shaped by timetabling and availability. These signals frame how this story prioritises investment, scheduling and support.
These resources include everything from traditional textbooks and scientific journals to advanced lab equipment and digital tools. For students studying sport and exercise sciences, these materials bridge theory and practice. Equipment such as heart rate monitors or motion capture technology becomes integral to learning. Student comments emphasise resources that are technically relevant and readily accessible to their module demands. Institutions need not just strong inventories but continuous evaluation of currency and effectiveness. Understanding and addressing these needs through a proactive approach enhances academic support and student satisfaction in this specialised area.
What specific learning needs do sport and exercise sciences students have?
Students face distinctive demands that require both foundational literature and hands-on resources. Access to well-equipped sports laboratories and high-quality gym facilities enables application of physiological, biomechanical and psychological concepts. Where such access is limited, learning stalls. Programmes should pilot strategies that extend access windows and reduce bottlenecks, drawing on models that work for mature and part-time cohorts. Digital advances such as virtual reality and simulation software should supplement, not replace, tactile learning. Maintaining a balanced portfolio supports varied learning preferences and assessment modes.
How should we balance access to physical and digital resources?
Physical resources, like textbooks, specialist equipment and lab facilities, provide tactile and real-world experience and are often preferred for practical sessions. Digital resources, including online databases, e-books and virtual simulations, offer flexibility and breadth. Students value the convenience of digital platforms but report screen fatigue and distraction; physical resources face availability and maintenance constraints. Providers should co-design the mix with students, simplify off-campus access steps, and provide single-location signposting and quick-start guides at the start of each module. This reduces friction during peak assessment periods and strengthens competence development.
How does laboratory and training equipment quality affect learning?
Laboratory and training equipment determine the quality of applied learning. Outdated or insufficient kit limits experimentation, research quality and training fidelity. Institutions should verify availability, capacity and compatibility of high-demand resources before term start, name an owner for each area, and capture issues weekly with short updates to students. State-of-the-art tools that simulate physiological responses or biomechanical movements help ensure accuracy. Students also ask for training equipment aligned to current industry standards to support transition into professional roles. Routine student feedback should inform upgrade cycles.
How should technological tools be integrated into learning?
Integrating wearable devices, fitness trackers and motion analysis software builds real-time understanding of theory through data. Students respond positively to relevant tools aligned to sport and health roles. Over-reliance on technology can, however, dilute essential practical technique. Programmes should articulate when and why a tool is used, align it to assessment briefs and marking criteria, and ensure every technology-supported task has an analogue skills pathway. This approach produces graduates able to leverage both technological and physical resources.
Why do practical sessions and fieldwork matter?
Practical workshops in biomechanics or physiology, alongside community coaching and internships, bridge classroom knowledge and professional practice. They build competence, confidence and engagement. Staff should ensure variety and quality in fieldwork, set explicit learning outcomes, and integrate structured reflection so that workplace experience feeds summative assessment.
How should academic staff support students to use resources well?
The role of academic staff in guiding students to utilise learning resources is central. Lecturers and technicians need to demonstrate resource use in context, for example by analysing data live in biomechanics software and linking it to the assessment brief and marking criteria. Students value approachable staff and explicit guidance on digital platforms and databases. Protect office hours, offer timely acknowledgement even when full responses take longer, and run short workshops on specialist tools. Strong staff availability sustains effective use of resources.
What should institutions do next to improve learning resources?
Listen to lived experience and target the bottlenecks students describe. Prioritise an accessibility audit of systems, reading lists, equipment booking and study spaces, provide alternative formats by default, and track fixes with a published accessibility backlog and resolution times. Extend service hours and flexible access windows where demand peaks outside daytime. Run resource readiness checks for labs, specialist software and equipment before each term, and keep students updated with brief summaries of what changed and why. Involve student representatives in procurement decisions so investment maps to programme needs. Review physical and digital library assets regularly to retire outdated materials and expand relevant holdings.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
Student Voice Analytics helps leaders and programme teams see where learning resources work well and where gaps persist. It analyses topic volume and sentiment over time, compares like-for-like across subject groups and demographics, and segments to school or module level so you can target labs, software and access models where they will shift outcomes. Export concise summaries for programme and service teams, monitor the accessibility backlog, and evidence improvement in NSS and internal pulse surveys.
Request a walkthrough
Book a Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
- All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
- Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
- Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
More posts on learning resources:
- Are accounting students satisfied with learning resources?
- Are learning resources working for art and design students?
- What do art students need from learning resources?
- Do English Studies students get the learning resources they need?