What do anatomy, physiology and pathology students need from the delivery of teaching?
Students prioritise practice‑rich, well‑structured sessions, responsive staff, and transparent assessment expectations. In National Student Survey (NSS) open‑text analysis of delivery of teaching across UK higher education, tone is positive overall (index +23.9) and particularly strong in health‑related areas (+35.8). For anatomy, physiology and pathology, sentiment sits at 52.6% Positive, with praise for engaged staff and breadth of content, alongside calls to tighten assessment clarity and operational rhythm. These sector signals frame how we interpret student perspectives on delivery in these disciplines.
Teaching in the specialised fields of anatomy, physiology, and pathology shapes future professionals in medical and health sciences. Ensuring effective delivery of knowledge and skills matters to staff and institutions seeking high educational standards. This analysis looks at students' perspectives on how their courses are taught, identifying strengths and areas for improvement. Through text analysis and student surveys, we capture student voice to evaluate what works and what should be enhanced in teaching. Balancing technology with hands‑on techniques presents both challenges and rewards. Using these insights helps educators tailor approaches to align with learners' expectations and academic requirements across theoretical and practical environments.
Which teaching methodologies work best right now?
Lectures provide structure and core concepts; practical labs offer the hands‑on application students rely on for mastery. Dissections remain valued for linking theory to real tissues and systems. Virtual simulations and online resources extend access and repetition, particularly for complex systems, but students still expect face‑to‑face practice to build competence. The strongest delivery blends structured explanations with frequent opportunities to apply, question, and revisit learning.
How effective are practical labs and hands-on learning?
Students report that interactive sessions, dissections, and laboratory experiments significantly improve understanding and retention. They ask for more consistent lab time and better sequencing so practicals connect directly to prior teaching. Where resources constrain physical sessions, staff can supplement with targeted simulations and scenario‑based tasks to extend practice opportunities without losing tactile skill development.
How should technology be integrated?
Students welcome advanced technologies such as virtual reality and 3D modelling to visualise complex processes and repeat key procedures. They worry, however, about over‑reliance on digital tools at the expense of manual dexterity and confidence under pressure. Programmes should integrate technology to extend, not replace, practical experience: make expectations explicit, signpost interaction points, and ensure remote elements dovetail with on‑site learning.
How should we balance theoretical and practical knowledge?
Students value rigorous theoretical foundations and want immediate opportunities to test and apply them. Delivery that pairs step‑by‑step worked examples with short formative checks helps consolidate learning before moving to more complex applications. Staff can sequence modules so classroom content routinely feeds into labs, clinics, or simulations in the same week, sustaining momentum and relevance.
What assessment and feedback approaches actually help?
Students want unambiguous expectations, fair criteria, and timely, actionable feedback. Within this subject grouping, concerns about assessment rigour centre on marking criteria, which trend sharply negative (−46.9). Staff can respond by publishing checklist‑style rubrics, sharing brief annotated exemplars, and committing to realistic service levels for feedback with feed‑forward guidance. Digital platforms can streamline turnaround and make advice easy to reference at revision points.
What support and resources do students use?
People‑centred support stands out. Availability of teaching staff is strongly endorsed (+42.2) and students value contact that helps them troubleshoot concepts quickly. Libraries, online databases, and peer‑assisted learning are effective when well signposted. Cohort‑wide communications that clarify what has changed and why improve students’ ability to plan study time and reduce avoidable friction.
What should we do next?
- Guarantee parity across modes and personal circumstances: high‑quality recordings, structured slide decks, and timely release of materials; make assessment briefings accessible asynchronously and easy to revisit.
- Lift clarity in delivery: use step‑by‑step worked examples, short formative checks, and consistent terminology to reduce cognitive load; align practicals tightly with recent teaching.
- Tighten timetabling and communications: minimise churn with a single source of truth, a named owner for changes, and short weekly updates that explain what has changed and why.
- Strengthen assessment literacy: publish rubrics alongside assessment briefs, provide micro‑exemplars that show “what good looks like”, and ensure feedback points to the next steps students should take.
- Keep a simple feedback loop: run quick pulse checks after key teaching blocks and review results termly with programme teams, tracking shifts by mode and age to focus actions where they will have most effect.
- Integrate employability touchpoints: early signposting and embedded careers sessions support confidence without large resource demands.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
Student Voice Analytics tracks topics and sentiment over time for delivery of teaching and for anatomy, physiology and pathology, from institution to programme level. It enables like‑for‑like comparisons across CAH subject families and student demographics (age, mode, domicile, ethnicity), plus segmentation by site or year. The platform produces concise, anonymised summaries and export‑ready outputs so programme teams and academic boards can act quickly on priorities grounded in student voice.
Book a Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and standards and NSS requirements.
More posts on delivery of teaching:
- Is Environmental Sciences teaching delivery working for students?
- What improves the delivery of economics teaching in UK higher education?
- Community nursing students' perspectives on teaching delivery
- What does good delivery of teaching look like in UK nursing education?
More posts on anatomy, physiology and pathology student views:
- What do students think of teaching staff in anatomy, physiology and pathology?
- What support do anatomy, physiology and pathology students need most?
- Are anatomy, physiology and pathology courses delivering the breadth and depth students expect?
- Does feedback in anatomy, physiology and pathology meet students’ needs?