What do education students value in teaching staff?

teaching staffeducation

Education students value expert, approachable lecturers who respond predictably, organise modules coherently, and make assessment expectations explicit; they rate teaching staff highly when these fundamentals are in place. Across the Teaching Staff category in the National Student Survey (NSS), 78.3% of comments are positive from 25,281 comments, with a sentiment index of +52.8, signalling a strong baseline for staff-student interactions across the sector. Within education programmes, Teaching Staff attract a 6.0% share of all comments and an index of ~+41.3, and students foreground people and support as drivers of satisfaction. This category draws together open-text reflections on lecturers and tutors across UK providers, while the CAH code groups Education courses sector-wide; together they highlight which staff behaviours students notice and reward.

How do expertise and support from staff influence education students?

Within higher education, education students ask for staff who combine deep expertise with consistent accessibility and empathy. Supportive, motivating staff shape academic and personal growth and model practice students take into future teaching careers. Approachability, well-judged challenge, and the ability to explain complex ideas in digestible ways feature repeatedly in feedback. Because experiences can vary by profile and subject, teams should monitor differential experiences across cohorts (including part-time and Black students), check consistency across teaching teams, and invite short, timely pulse feedback after substantive teaching moments.

How should courses and modules be organised to support learning?

Coherent course design and predictable timetabling sustain engagement. Students value modules that integrate varied learning approaches and resources and connect theory to contemporary practice. A single source of truth for timetable and delivery updates, brief explanations for any change, and timely communication about expectations keep the learning process smooth. Regularly refreshed content and applied case work help students connect learning to school and college settings they will encounter.

What does effective leadership look like in education departments?

Leaders set the tone for reliable, student-centred delivery. They make high-trust behaviours visible: prompt replies to queries, predictable office hours, and “what to expect this week” updates. They also review sentiment and comments by cohort, close the loop with students on what has changed, and set clear expectations for consistent interactions across teaching teams. Students read leadership through day-to-day behaviours as much as through strategy; credibility comes from responsiveness and follow-through.

How should staff act on student experience and feedback?

Actively engaging with feedback improves outcomes and trust. Education students respond best when assessment briefs and marking criteria are explicit, exemplified, and turnaround is predictable. Feedback is most effective when students can act on it quickly and when staff signpost how it links to learning outcomes. Transparent mechanisms for raising and resolving issues, and visible reporting back on actions taken, signal that student views matter and inform decisions.

How do programmes build personal and professional development?

Students value structured opportunities to develop critical thinking, creativity, and communication. Staff mentoring, targeted skills workshops, and reflective practice sessions enable students to link theory with placement or school-based experience. Regular individual tutorials that set goals and document next steps build confidence and progression. Education students frequently describe tangible gains in personal development, and staff commitment to sustained, developmental conversations is often highlighted positively.

How should policy and practice be taught for real-world readiness?

Students want contemporary policy and inclusive pedagogy taught in ways that connect directly to classrooms. Staff should bridge policy to practice through cases, simulations, and analysis of teaching strategies that work across varied learning needs. Emphasising application helps students anticipate the realities of school settings and equips them to evaluate and implement policy with professional judgement.

How do staff develop research and inquiry skills?

Students benefit when staff scaffold inquiry: formulating robust research questions, designing ethical studies, gathering data, and analysing findings. Effective mentorship through proposal to write-up builds confidence and rigour, while opportunities to join ongoing projects or initiate small-scale inquiries help students contribute meaningfully to the academic and practitioner communities.

What learning environment and culture sustain engagement?

Inclusive, collaborative environments strengthen learning and community. Staff shape these cultures by modelling open communication, respectful dialogue, and a willingness to try and evaluate new teaching methods. Where groupwork is required, design for purpose—roles, criteria, and milestones—supported by light-touch facilitation to improve the experience students report when working with peers. Effective use of learning technologies can broaden participation and prepare students for contemporary educational practice.

How Student Voice Analytics helps you

Student Voice Analytics turns open-text survey comments into clear, prioritised actions for Education. It tracks Teaching Staff and related themes over time, with drill-downs from provider to CAH and cohort. You can compare like-for-like against the sector, segment by mode, campus and year of study, and monitor differential experiences across groups. Concise, anonymised summaries and export-ready tables support programme and quality boards, while simple dashboards help teams evidence change and protect strengths in timetabling, assessment clarity, and student support.

Request a walkthrough

Book a Student Voice Analytics demo

See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.

• All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
• Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
• Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.

Book a demo Prefer email? [email protected]

More posts on teaching staff:

• How do physics students view teaching staff?
• What are computer science students saying about their teaching staff?
• What do politics students say about teaching staff?
• Do zoology students feel well supported by teaching staff?

More posts on education student views:

• Do education students think learning resources meet their needs?
• Does wider module choice in education degrees improve student experience and career readiness?
• What do education students say about student life at university?
• What improves communication between students and supervisors, lecturers and tutors in Education?