What do pharmacy students say about teaching delivery?
By Student Voice Analytics
delivery of teachingpharmacyThey value well‑structured, practice‑oriented teaching with responsive staff and small‑group workshops, but ask for earlier clinical exposure and much tighter timetabling. In the National Student Survey (NSS), Delivery of teaching trends positive across the sector (60.2% Positive; index +23.9), while pharmacy as a Common Aggregation Hierarchy subject grouping shows strong approval for day‑to‑day delivery (7.4% of pharmacy comments; ~+30.2) alongside persistent concerns about placements and scheduling that shape readiness for practice.
This blog post looks at how pharmacy students from across the UK perceive their teaching delivery. Focusing on areas such as drug delivery, drug design, and pharmaceutical sciences, we analyse the themes and issues students highlight. We consider how different methodologies, both traditional and online, land with learners, drawing on student surveys and text analysis. Many appreciate flexibility and access from online provision; others report reduced interaction and practical engagement. These perspectives influence satisfaction and transition into professional roles. By acting on student voice, institutions can adapt and keep learning current and relevant.
Do students want a stronger clinical focus?
Students consistently ask for more clinical exposure to build confidence and professional judgement. Simulated patient interactions and live clinical training translate theory into practice. Pharmacy comments show that placements occupy substantial attention (9.6% share; ~+4.6), but tone depends on capacity, scheduling and communication. Designing placements as a service—securing capacity early, setting allocation principles, and capturing brief feedback on each placement—improves both experience and outcomes without destabilising the curriculum.
How do students weigh in-person and online methods?
Face‑to‑face sessions foster community and immediate feedback; online formats provide flexibility, especially for those balancing work and caring responsibilities. Sector patterns show a mode gap, with full‑time students reporting a stronger tone on delivery (+27.3) than part‑time learners (+7.2). Programmes should guarantee parity for part‑time and commuting students: high‑quality recordings, timely materials, chunked sessions with concise summaries, and assessment briefs accessible asynchronously. These practices retain online flexibility while protecting the hands‑on learning pharmacy requires.
How do students evaluate lecturer quality?
Students judge lecturer quality on the ability to explain complex concepts, connect theory to practice, and respond promptly. They highlight enthusiasm, relevant case examples and well‑structured sessions. Institutions can spread effective habits with light‑touch peer observation, short micro‑exemplars of high‑performing sessions (5–10 minutes), and a delivery rubric covering structure, clarity, pacing and interaction.
Why do workshops and small classes matter?
Workshops and small classes support active learning, frequent formative checks and detailed feedback—conditions that help students master complex pharmaceutical concepts. Small‑group formats promote dialogue, surface misconceptions quickly and allow staff to tailor explanations to different learning needs.
Are students getting enough practical experience?
Students often report insufficient hands‑on practice early in programmes. Simulation labs and structured exposure to dispensing, patient counselling and pharmacy management provide the necessary foundation. Given the prominence of placements (9.6% share; ~+4.6), programmes should integrate practice‑based learning earlier and remove friction around logistics so students focus on learning rather than administration.
What do students value in exceptional teachers?
Students praise teachers who make scientific content accessible, frame learning through clinical scenarios, and provide timely support. Recognising and sharing practice from these teachers—through internal workshops and mentoring—builds capability across the programme and raises the baseline experience for each cohort.
What would improve teaching delivery?
To enhance delivery, universities should act where sentiment is most elastic:
- Fix the operational rhythm. Timetabling regularly drags sentiment in pharmacy (5.2%; ~−35.1). Provide a stable timetable, name a contact for changes, and publish a weekly “what changed and why” update.
- Make expectations unmistakable. Use annotated exemplars and checklist‑style rubrics for assessments; set a realistic feedback turnaround SLA.
- Standardise for cognitive load. Use a consistent slide structure and terminology; embed step‑by‑step worked examples and short formative checks.
- Close access gaps. Prioritise parity for part‑time students with high‑quality recordings, concise summaries and accessible assessment briefs.
- Keep a simple feedback loop. Run quick pulse checks after teaching blocks and review results termly with programme teams, focusing on actions that shift the index.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
Student Voice Analytics turns open‑text feedback into prioritised actions for pharmacy. It tracks topics and sentiment over time for teaching delivery and related operational themes, with drill‑downs by programme, cohort, site and Common Aggregation Hierarchy subject. You can compare like‑for‑like against sector patterns, surface mode and age gaps, and export concise, anonymised summaries for programme teams and academic boards so actions on placements, timetabling, assessment briefs and workshop design are targeted and demonstrably effective.
Request a walkthrough
Book a Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
-
All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
-
Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
-
Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
More posts on delivery of teaching:
More posts on pharmacy student views: