Yes. Across 23,254 National Student Survey (NSS) open-text comments on student support, students report broadly positive experiences, with 68.6% Positive and tone strongest in Education and teaching (index 45.1). Within Education, we analyse around 5,899 comments, where student support reads as a visible strength with a sentiment index of 33.4, although consistency and access still vary. This category spans academic, pastoral and disability support across the sector, while the subject grouping covers programmes that prepare educators; together they show why staff responsiveness, dependable processes and inclusive design shape how students experience support in education courses.
When starting higher education, particularly within education courses, the support structure available to students matters for academic and personal growth. This piece analyses multi-layered perceptions of the help students receive, highlighting positive interactions and areas for enhancement. Student support spans academic assistance, wellbeing, and social support, each shaping the educational journey. Analysing student feedback, including surveys and text analysis, reveals how students judge responsiveness, follow-through, and inclusivity. By evaluating these perspectives, staff can prioritise the balance between providing adequate support and fostering independence. Robust support alleviates academic pressure; insufficient provision hinders success and wellbeing. Scrutiny of these viewpoints helps institutions refine strategies and adapt to the needs of each cohort.
What do students value about staff and tutors? A recurring theme is appreciation for approachable, proactive staff and tutors who respond quickly and resolve issues. Students describe educators who go beyond routine duties to help with academic queries and personal challenges, which strengthens engagement and motivation. These encounters show staff not only transmit knowledge but also enable holistic development. Some cohorts seek more consistent interaction across modules and placements. Institutions should retain human, timely responses and ensure parity of experience across the programme.
How do flexibility and resources shape the experience? Flexible timetabling, blended delivery and well-curated materials help students balance study, work and caring commitments. Virtual learning environments that provide recordings, exemplars and clear signposting allow students to study at their own pace. Students ask providers to improve the range, currency and accessibility of resources, and to align them more tightly to assessment briefs. Programmes that maintain a reliable single source of truth for updates reduce friction and help students plan.
Where does academic support fall short? Two weak points recur: feedback that arrives too late to inform learning, and feedback that lacks actionable detail against the marking criteria. Students use feedback best when turnaround is predictable, comments are specific to the criteria, and exemplars show standard. Requests for extensions or ECs need streamlined, transparent steps and clear timeframes. Providers should publish service levels for feedback and extensions, name case owners, and monitor time-to-resolution so students can rely on the process.
What stops students accessing mental health support? Hesitation to disclose and stigma remain barriers. Students sometimes feel mental health receives less attention than academic concerns, which deters help-seeking. Staff training, visible referral routes and rapid triage reduce this friction. The student voice indicates gaps for disabled students, so providers should standardise accessible communications, offer proactive follow-ups until resolution, and ensure that specialist referrals sit within a coherent, supportive narrative rather than a hand-off.
How do IT systems and communication get in the way? Unreliable systems and unclear communications disrupt access to materials, submissions and updates. Outages and fragmented channels undermine confidence in digital delivery. Students benefit when institutions provide a single front door for queries, extended support hours, and fast, human replies. Robust release schedules and timely alerts help cohorts navigate critical points in the assessment calendar.
Why does course organisation still frustrate students? Students want stable timetables, clear module structures and early visibility of assessment clustering. When changes occur, they expect concise rationale and prompt messaging across channels. Agreement across teaching teams on delivery expectations and assessment timings reduces avoidable stress. Engaging students in reviewing timetabling and module flow helps teams prioritise fixes that improve the day-to-day experience.
What should educators change now? Prioritise consistent responsiveness, explicit assessment design, and accessible processes. Retain proactive personal tutoring and extend availability around assessment peaks. Standardise how feedback references marking criteria and exemplars, and keep digital resources dependable and easy to navigate. Strengthen mental health support with visible routes and rapid triage, and continuously test timetabling and communications with students.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you Student Voice Analytics turns open-text survey comments into prioritised actions for education programmes. It tracks topic volume and sentiment over time, with drill-downs from provider to school and course, and like-for-like comparisons by subject area and student demographics. You can export concise, anonymised summaries to brief programme teams and professional services without additional analysis, and evidence change year on year.
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and standards and NSS requirements.