What do media studies students need from feedback?
They need timely, actionable and consistent comments that show how to improve against the marking criteria and what to do next. Across the National Student Survey (NSS), the feedback theme is a sector bellwether and leans negative, with 57.3% of 27,344 comments negative. In media studies, overall tone is more positive than many disciplines, yet feedback-specific remarks account for about 6.2% of comments and carry a negative index (−9.3), particularly where marking criteria feel opaque (−44.1). These signals shape the themes that follow and explain why students ask for prompt returns within the 15-day window, transparent rubrics and practical feed-forward they can apply to their next assignment.
How do media studies students use feedback to learn?
Understanding feedback from students’ perspectives helps departments prioritise changes that affect learning. Students focus on timing, clarity and the perceived fairness of comments and marks. Analysing open-text from surveys such as the NSS highlights recurring issues and practices that work, so module teams can respond with substantive improvements that raise confidence, progression and outcomes in media studies.
How does timeliness of feedback influence media studies learning?
Meeting expected turnaround enables students to apply advice to the next task in sequence. When feedback arrives after the preferable 15-day window, students report anxiety and a lost opportunity to improve before their next assessment. Departments can publish a feedback service level agreement by assessment type, track on-time rates, and pair each return with short, structured feed-forward so students know what to do next. Timely and actionable responses drive engagement across modules and support a coherent learning cycle.
How do students interpret feedback clarity?
Students value comments that map explicitly to the marking criteria and point to specific changes. Vague or generic phrasing leaves students uncertain about standards, which is especially unhelpful where creative and critical judgement is central. Checklist-style rubrics, annotated exemplars and concise “what we look for” explanations improve transparency. Brief dialogic opportunities for questions enable students to test their understanding and apply advice confidently in subsequent work.
What defines high-quality feedback for media studies students?
Students respond to feedback that is respectful, specific to the submitted work and balanced across strengths and priorities for development. Overly abrupt or generic comments undermine motivation and do little to guide improvement. Programme teams can introduce spot checks on feedback quality for specificity, actionability and alignment to criteria, and ensure each return includes positive reinforcement alongside concrete next steps. Consistent, respectful communication helps students use feedback as a tool for progression rather than a one-off judgement.
How consistent is feedback and assessment marking across modules?
Variation in interpretation of criteria erodes trust in both marking and feedback. Students want assurance that standards apply consistently across assessors and modules. Teams can adopt concise, shared rubrics and run regular calibration sprints where staff co-mark samples and compare rationales. This strengthens alignment to the assessment brief and marking criteria, and gives students a stable set of expectations to work towards across their programme.
How does feedback shape the wider course experience?
Feedback influences satisfaction and engagement as much as teaching and resources. During periods of disruption, constructive and prompt responses provide continuity and support. In media studies, where creative practice and critical analysis develop iteratively, high-quality feedback helps students refine technique, argument and production decisions in rhythm with the programme. Staff should consider the emotional as well as academic impact of tone and content to maintain momentum and confidence across the cohort.
How should communication and interaction support feedback?
Delays and mixed messages dilute the value of comments. Students benefit from a single source of truth for schedules and assessment updates, consistent guidance across lecturers, and clear routes to ask follow-up questions. Regular touchpoints sustain dialogue, help students interpret advice in context, and reduce confusion between modules. Embedding this communication rhythm supports learning and contributes to an inclusive, supportive environment.
What should media studies departments prioritise next?
Prioritise timely returns, criteria-referenced clarity and visible consistency across assessors. Use concise rubrics with exemplars, add structured feed-forward to every return, calibrate marking periodically, and close the loop by showing students how feedback processes change in response to their input. These practices make feedback usable, build trust and align assessment with the iterative nature of media studies.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
- Turns NSS open-text into trackable metrics for Feedback and Media Studies: sentiment over time, topic shares and differences by age, mode, disability, domicile and CAH subject.
- Enables drill-down from provider to school, department and programme, with concise, anonymised summaries for module teams and boards.
- Supports calibration and improvement by comparing like-for-like against sector peers, monitoring on-time rates and the actionability of comments, and evidencing change with simple you said → we did updates.
Book a Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and standards and NSS requirements.
More posts on feedback:
- Are we closing the feedback gap in health sciences?
- Do law students get the feedback they need?
- How can feedback be improved in business and management studies?
- Is feedback helping mechanical engineering students learn?