Do UK mechanical engineering students feel they get value for money?
Often not. In the National Student Survey (NSS), the costs and value for money theme is overwhelmingly unfavourable (88.3% Negative; sentiment index −46.7), although engineering subjects are somewhat less negative (−41.1). Within mechanical engineering, however, the overall mood is more balanced (49.8% Positive, 45.9% Negative), which shows that students recognise value when providers make costs predictable and align delivery, assessment and access to laboratories with what was promised. These patterns reflect how the sector discusses value at category level and how this discipline’s student voice prioritises delivery mechanics, assessment clarity and resources.
We analyse mechanical engineering students’ views on fees and value, focusing on financial pressures and the quality they receive. Using survey and text analytics, we surface where perceptions deteriorate and which fixes matter. When universities act on these signals, they align provision to expectations and strengthen satisfaction.
How do students assess value for money?
Students judge value against the substance and delivery of what is promised. Concerns intensify when online modules feel like a poorer substitute for lab-based learning, when assessment briefs and marking criteria lack transparency, or when turnaround times slip. Students ask for course materials that justify the fee level, consistent access to equipment, and assessment information that enables them to prepare, perform and improve. Programme teams that adjust resources, improve teaching delivery, and publish rubrics and exemplars move perceptions in the right direction.
What happens to perceived value when providers cut costs?
Cutting costs in lab-intensive disciplines directly affects perceived value. Reductions in lab time, ageing equipment, or thinner staff cover undermine the confidence students place in the programme. Larger cohorts with reduced contact hours squeeze opportunities for clarification on complex topics. Budget decisions should protect core lab experiences, technician capacity, and timetabling stability; these are where students notice and where value judgments form.
How did the pandemic reshape perceptions of value?
The pandemic exposed how remote learning can miss the mark for hands-on subjects. Students paid full fees while losing reliable access to workshops, peer collaboration in labs and on-site demonstrations. As blended models persist, providers need to state the purpose of online components, link them clearly to assessments, and ensure timely access to specialist software and remote lab alternatives where appropriate. Restoring trust depends on demonstrating that format choices support learning rather than reduce costs.
Where do resource and staffing constraints undermine value?
Resource constraints show up most sharply during intensive project phases. Students experience bottlenecks for equipment bookings, shorter support windows, and slower responses when several modules peak simultaneously. A single, accurate source of truth for module information, predictable timetables, and protected staff availability help students plan and see value. Investing in technician time and lab scheduling tools delivers immediate gains.
How do accommodation costs distort the value equation?
High rents compound fee pressures, especially in large cities. Students choose longer commutes or extra work hours, both of which cut into study time and engagement. Universities can mitigate this by publishing a total cost-of-study view, negotiating accommodation partnerships, signposting travel discounts, and scheduling lab blocks to minimise unnecessary trips. These practical steps support wellbeing and raise perceived value.
What are the value-for-money pressures for international students?
International students face higher fees and additional living costs while adapting to a new system. They expect visible quality in teaching, resources and support commensurate with their investment. Dedicated bursaries, targeted financial advice, and clear guidance on what fees include help address perceived inequities. When departments ensure assessment clarity and timely academic support, international students report a fairer return.
Why does opaque fee structuring erode trust?
Students query what fees cover when they cannot see where money goes or why charges change. Publishing a straightforward cost breakdown per programme, with typical additional costs and their timing, builds trust. A “no surprises” policy for extra spend, standardised cost guidance in module handbooks and the VLE, and service standards for reimbursements reduce friction and improve perceptions of value.
What does this mean for mechanical engineering providers?
Act where students feel value most: protect lab access, stabilise delivery, and make assessment intelligible and useful. Publish a total cost-of-study view and implement predictable, timely reimbursements. Front‑load practical information for full-time, younger cohorts during cost-heavy periods and capture practices from engineering teams that already minimise student spend or demonstrate value transparently. Doing so sustains satisfaction and supports progression without diluting academic standards.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
Student Voice Analytics pinpoints where value-for-money concerns are sharpest by subject, mode and cohort, and shows how delivery, assessment and operations drive perceptions in mechanical engineering. You can drill from institution to programme, segment by site or cohort, and generate concise, anonymised summaries for teaching teams and finance/operations. Like‑for‑like comparisons with other disciplines and demographics support targeted interventions, and export-ready views make it straightforward to brief colleagues and track impact over time.
Request a walkthrough
Book a Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
- All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
- Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
- Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
More posts on costs and value for money:
- Are business and management students getting value for money?
- Do media studies students feel they get value for money?
- Is UK finance education worth the cost?
- Are UK art students getting value for money?