Can remote learning work for dentistry students?
Yes—when providers secure predictable operations and remote‑first resources, dentistry students thrive online while keeping clinical development on track. In National Student Survey (NSS) open‑text data, comments about remote learning read net‑negative overall (42.0% Positive, 53.8% Negative; sentiment index −3.4), whereas dentistry runs more positive overall (60.4% Positive). The pinch points are operational: timetabling attracts a −29.8 index in dentistry, so students prioritise timely recordings, well‑paced live sessions and dependable clinic time. This sector picture shapes the pragmatic choices described below.
Access to learning: why do timely recorded sessions matter?
Timely recordings provide parity for students juggling clinics, commutes and caring. Searchable uploads soon after teaching let students revisit complex procedures and prepare for upcoming classes. They also stabilise the weekly rhythm online cohorts need. Programme teams can set ownership and turnaround expectations, host a single link hub per module, and add short summaries of key takeaways so asynchronous routes remain equivalent to live delivery.
Live online plenaries: how do we balance them with personal study time?
Short, purposeful plenaries free time for directed independent study. Use shorter blocks (10–15 mins), clear outcomes and activities that link directly to assessment briefs and clinic preparation. Avoid back‑to‑back sessions that create fatigue; a consistent weekly pattern (same platform, day, joining route) helps students plan labs, clinics and reading. Quality beats quantity when live time complements a structured self‑study pathway.
Does face‑to‑face remain essential alongside online delivery?
Yes. Dentistry students need supervised, hands‑on clinical exposure to build judgement and confidence. Blend in‑person clinics with online theory and scaffold with simulations to rehearse before patient contact. Invest in high‑quality demo capture (multiple angles where feasible) so online preparation translates to clinic performance, while preserving the irreplaceable value of direct patient interaction and real‑time supervision.
Engagement: how do we overcome disrupted learning experiences?
Design online sessions for interaction: short explainers, applied tasks, live Q&A and breakout case discussions sustain momentum and reduce isolation. Publish what changed and why each week to close the loop on common digital friction points (access, audio, link churn, timetable slips). Where disruption persists, provide rapid written follow‑ups and clear escalation routes so students know how to get support.
Interactive hurdles: how can we reduce learning difficulties online?
Students feel disengaged when workshops become passive streams. Use diagnostics and light‑touch text analytics to spot where understanding dips, then target additional support or exemplars. Pre‑clinic virtual scenarios, structured critique templates and short peer debriefs keep application at the centre. Keep a single source of truth for links and deadlines to minimise unnecessary cognitive load.
Learning materials: how do we ensure access for all?
Make remote‑first the default: captioned recordings, transcripts, alt‑text on visuals and low‑bandwidth versions alongside downloadable files for offline study. Complex procedures benefit from step‑by‑step decks and short clips rather than one long video. A quick student poll can surface gaps in accessibility so teams can prioritise fixes that have the biggest impact on participation.
Blended learning: what format do dentistry students prefer?
A hybrid model. Students value online flexibility for theory but still depend on in‑person clinics for skills acquisition and feedback. Build a coherent sequence where online materials prepare students for practicals, and clinics feed back into targeted online reflection. Virtual simulations remain a bridge, not a substitute, for clinical contact hours.
Support systems: which supports help students navigate remote teaching well?
Regular academic check‑ins, prompt technical help and a short “getting set online” orientation reduce barriers. Provide simple guides for required software, run drop‑in workshops, and keep time‑zone‑aware office hours where relevant. Students respond well when staff visibility is high and responsibilities for comms, timetabling and assessment guidance are explicit.
Concentration: what helps students sustain attention online?
Use varied formats within sessions (explain, apply, quiz, reflect), build in micro‑breaks, and set clear goals for each block. Spread content across shorter segments rather than long lectures and keep a consistent weekly cadence so students can manage energy and commitments across modules.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
Student Voice Analytics surfaces where remote delivery enables or hinders dentistry students. It tracks topic volume and sentiment over time, slices results by mode, age, domicile/ethnicity, disability and subject groups, and produces concise, anonymised summaries for programme teams and governance. For dentistry, it highlights the operational issues that depress sentiment (timetabling, organisation, communication) and the strengths to extend (teaching staff, student support, personal development). For remote learning, it points to actions that raise parity—timely searchable recordings, low‑bandwidth materials, a single link hub per module—and monitors weekly whether fixes land. Exportable tables and charts support continuous improvement and evidence of impact.
Book a Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and standards and NSS requirements.
More posts on remote learning:
- Did remote learning work for mechanical engineering students?
- Midwifery students' views on remote learning
- Can remote learning work for health sciences students?
- What does student feedback say about remote learning in counselling, psychotherapy and occupational therapy?