Yes. Across students’ National Student Survey (NSS) comments, experiences of the personal tutor function trend positive (61.7% Positive; sentiment index +27.1), and within media studies students highlight high access to staff (Availability of teaching staff +52.2) alongside gains in personal development. The model works best for full-time students (index +32.0 vs +22.4 part-time), so predictable, responsive contact sustains confidence and project quality in this discipline. The analysis below shows how these sector patterns shape day-to-day tutoring and where course teams can tighten practice.
The NSS is the UK’s National Student Survey. It captures students’ evaluations of course delivery and support, including personal tutoring. We analyse student comments and text data so programme teams can act on what matters to media studies cohorts.
How does information support from tutors shape media studies students’ confidence and progress?
In personal tutoring, information support anchors students’ early confidence and subsequent progress. Media studies students navigate complex projects and need guidance on media theories, methods and how assessment standards apply to creative work. When tutors provide timely, relevant information, students report smoother transitions into modules and stronger engagement. Gaps in guidance, especially around how work will be assessed, can erode confidence. Publishing concise quick-start guides, topic maps and “how this will be assessed” signposts at module level helps students align ideas with marking criteria and reduces avoidable anxiety.
What happens when students must adapt to a new personal tutor?
Continuity in the tutoring relationship matters for students working on long-running creative projects. Switching tutors mid-year disrupts trust, interrupts feedback cycles and can delay decisions. Where changes are unavoidable, a structured handover, shared notes and a short introductory meeting protect momentum. A simple service standard for response times and check-ins also reassures students that support continues without friction.
Which communication channels and response norms work best?
Students value a blend of email, online platforms and in-person meetings when response times are predictable. Publishing an expected response window, routine office hours and a typical check-in cadence makes the model legible. Offering asynchronous options and some out-of-hours slots improves parity for part-time and commuting students. Clarity of responses matters as much as speed: short, direct answers linked to assessment briefs and marking criteria help students act quickly.
How does feedback from tutors influence creative work and motivation?
Constructive, actionable feedback unlocks progress in subjects where interpretation and creativity are central. Students respond when tutors frame strengths and specific next steps, use checklist-style rubrics and annotated exemplars, and schedule brief debriefs so advice translates into revision plans. Vague comments dampen motivation; targeted feedback tied to the assessment brief and criteria sustains effort and improves the quality of outputs.
Does tutor availability translate into better support?
High availability for one-to-one meetings underpins both academic and pastoral support. Simple online booking that shows real-time capacity avoids bottlenecks. Visibility of office hours and clear routes for urgent queries reduce reliance on informal networks. Integrating academic and wellbeing conversations where appropriate helps students navigate workload pressures and maintain momentum across the semester.
How do personal tutors connect students to the wider university?
Personal tutors are a primary point of contact who can demystify university systems, assessment policies and support services. Regular, meaningful contact helps students feel part of the academic community and more confident using specialist facilities. Effective signposting and introductions to careers, skills and technical teams build belonging and accelerate students’ use of resources that improve their work.
What challenges do personal tutors face in media studies programmes?
Role conflicts arise when tutors also hold programme leadership responsibilities, especially in disputes about assessment. Tutors balance fast-changing industry tools with the demands of academic rigour and pastoral care. Time pressures can dilute feedback quality and availability. Playbooks that standardise response norms, onboarding materials and handover steps, alongside training on constructive dialogue in creative disciplines, help tutors manage these pressures while sustaining consistency across a cohort.
What should universities adjust now?
Prioritise continuity and predictability. Protect response norms and check-ins, and use structured handovers when staffing changes occur. Make assessment expectations visible at module level and align feedback to marking criteria. Ensure appointment options work for students with different modes and schedules, and track parity so experience remains inclusive across cohorts.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
Request a walkthrough
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
© Student Voice Systems Limited, All rights reserved.