What do journalism students say about teaching staff?

teaching staffjournalism

Students in journalism are broadly positive about the people who teach them. In the National Student Survey (NSS), comments about Teaching Staff across UK higher education skew positive, with 78.3% positive overall; within journalism, the tone around teaching staff is strong at +41.3 on the sentiment index. Teaching Staff captures open-text views on staff expertise, support and accessibility across the sector, while journalism is the Common Aggregation Hierarchy subject grouping used for like-for-like comparison. These benchmarks frame what students expect from programmes: industry-connected teaching, timely guidance and operational reliability.

Understanding the perspectives of journalism students on teaching staff enhances the quality of education and students’ professional trajectories. Staff shape the academic experience and influence career prospects. Student voice, gathered through surveys and text analysis, provides actionable insights that help institutions adjust curricula and teaching practices to the journalism labour market. These inputs highlight gaps between expectations and delivery and prompt regular evaluation and professional development across teaching teams.

Where do expectations meet reality?

Journalism students expect staff who both instruct and inspire, grounded in current media practices and technologies. Many encounter colleagues who exceed this benchmark, contributing real-world experience that enriches the learning environment. Others report a persistent theory–practice gap where industry currency is uneven. Programmes therefore prioritise continuous professional development and practitioner input to keep modules aligned to contemporary journalism. Protecting the strong baseline for Teaching Staff sentiment depends on visible credibility and availability.

Why do industry experience and connections matter?

Industry experience and active networks translate theory into applied learning and strengthen employability. Students value access to internships, mentoring and introductions that flow from staff connections. Career guidance and support draws notable attention in journalism, attracting 6.3% of comments, signalling that practical advice and referral routes are integral to perceived teaching quality. Where this is absent, curricula feel abstract and students can be less prepared to enter a competitive jobs market.

Which teaching methods work best for journalism programmes?

Students respond well to interactive, practice-led approaches that mirror newsroom workflows. Workshops, seminars and real-world assignments help bridge theory and practice and sustain engagement across a diverse cohort. Lectures retain a place for structured grounding in media law, ethics and theory, but programmes lift relevance when they blend delivery modes, use live briefs and align assessment with industry norms. Text analysis tasks build critical engagement and should sit alongside applied reporting and production exercises.

How do feedback and staff accessibility shape learning?

Feedback steers technique and judgement in a deadline-driven discipline. In journalism, sentiment around feedback remains net negative at −11.7 when comments are slow, generic or criteria feel opaque. Publishing annotated exemplars, using checklist-style rubrics and providing targeted, actionable comments enable students to improve at pace. Accessibility also matters: staff who are approachable and reachable through planned office hours and well-used online channels provide the predictability students seek, especially at assessment pinch-points.

What digital and multimedia capabilities do students expect?

Digital literacy now sits alongside core reporting. Students expect staff to model competent use of multimedia storytelling tools, social platforms for professional presence and data journalism techniques. Variation in staff digital competence produces inconsistent learning experiences. Focused professional development and shared resources help teams integrate evolving tools into teaching while maintaining academic standards.

How do diverse perspectives strengthen journalism education?

Diverse staff teams bring distinctive insights that sharpen students’ reporting, framing and audience understanding. Representation in teaching, case material and sources expands students’ analytical range and better reflects the communities they will serve. Recruitment, development and support that broaden diversity improve classroom dialogue and prepare graduates to operate in a globalised media landscape.

What should programmes do next?

Prioritise industry currency, assessment clarity and accessible support. Protect the strong baseline on staff experience and approachability by setting visible service standards, monitoring sentiment at cohort level and closing the loop with students on changes made. Keep curricula practical through live briefs, newsroom partnerships and calibration of marking. Acknowledge and mitigate contextual shocks: sentiment on strike action remains heavily negative at −64.1, so providers should explain decisions plainly, offer catch-up routes and record mitigations students can track.

How Student Voice Analytics helps you

• Continuous visibility of Teaching Staff comments and sentiment over time, with drill-down from provider to subject and cohort for journalism.
• Like-for-like comparisons by subject grouping and student demographics, so programme teams can see where journalism diverges from the sector and why.
• Concise, anonymised summaries for programme and departmental briefings, plus export-ready tables for quality and governance boards.
• A simple dashboard to track sentiment, surface outliers and evidence impact after interventions in assessment clarity, careers support and operational delivery.

Request a walkthrough

Book a Student Voice Analytics demo

See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.

• All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
• Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
• Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.

Book a demo Prefer email? [email protected]

More posts on teaching staff:

• What are tourism, transport and travel students saying about teaching staff?
• What do biosciences students say about teaching staff?
• What do students say about teaching staff in French studies?
• What do dental students say about their teaching staff?

More posts on journalism student views:

• How do journalism students experience university support and communication?