Is feedback in biomedical sciences helping students learn?
By Student Voice Analytics
feedbackbiomedical sciences (non-specific)Not consistently. Across the NSS (National Student Survey) feedback category, tone skews negative (33.5% Positive, 57.3% Negative), and in biomedical sciences (non-specific) the feedback theme is strongly negative (sentiment index −31.5) despite broadly positive views of teaching and support. The feedback category aggregates sector-wide student comments on assessment feedback, while the biomedical sciences code groups programmes across providers; taken together, they show that marking criteria remain a particular pinch point (−52.3) even as dissertation support is more encouraging (+5.6). These insights set the direction for practical changes that make feedback timely, useful and usable.
How does feedback shape learning in biomedical sciences?
Feedback stands as a cornerstone of effective teaching and learning within the biomedical sciences. The highly technical nature of this subject means feedback must correct, guide and clarify complex ideas. In lab settings, timely and precise feedback enables students to refine techniques and understand intricate procedures. Staff should prioritise explanations that help students grasp why procedures are performed in particular ways, alongside what to change next. Integrating student voice into feedback—via surveys, text analysis and structured dialogue—allows teams to adjust approaches and sustain a productive feedback loop that supports comprehension and application.
Where do assessment briefs and guidance still lack clarity?
Ambiguity in assessment criteria and guidance undermines learning in a discipline that demands precision. When instructions and expectations are vague, students struggle to align effort with grading benchmarks and to act on feedback. The biomedical sciences data underline this: sentiment around marking criteria sits at −52.3. Programmes can respond by publishing concise rubrics, annotated exemplars and plain‑English assessment briefs, then aligning in‑class Q&A to those artefacts. Text analysis of student comments helps educators pinpoint where wording confuses interpretation, so teams can revise briefs and criteria before the next cohort encounters the same problem.
How can we tackle inconsistency in feedback and marking?
Variability across markers confuses students about standards. Calibration sprints using shared samples, spot checks on specificity and actionability, and standardised feedback templates reduce divergence and improve trust in marking. Teams should provide feed‑forward—what to do next—alongside criteria‑referenced comments, and capture approaches that work well in modes where students are more positive (for example, staged feedback and dialogic sessions common in part‑time provision). Consistent formats and expectations across modules help students identify strengths and priorities for improvement.
When are formative assessments most useful?
Formative assessments matter when they arrive in time to change practice. Publish a feedback service level agreement by assessment type, track on‑time rates, and schedule formative tasks so students can apply comments before summative points. Focus comments on the specific misconceptions evident in responses and include a short “how to use your feedback” note within the module. Involving students in scheduling decisions and trialling formats in small pilots helps ensure formative activity supports the cohort’s learning rhythm.
Why do students want more feedback on examinations?
In a content‑rich, applied discipline, the absence of exam feedback leaves students unsure where misconceptions lie. Programmes can provide structured post‑exam reviews that map common errors to marking criteria, offer brief individual pointers, and signpost targeted resources. Student surveys consistently report demand for specific and constructive exam feedback; closing this gap helps students recalibrate study strategies and improves performance in subsequent modules.
What does effective student–staff engagement look like?
Effective engagement centres on relevance and responsiveness. Staff gain usable insights by analysing patterns in student comments and by running short, focused feedback discussions within modules. Students benefit when they are invited to articulate what helped and what hindered, and when changes are visible in subsequent assessment briefs and marking approaches. Dialogic feedback sessions, regular tutor availability and transparent “you said → we did” updates build credibility and keep the loop closed.
What should we change next?
In biomedical sciences, the feedback theme is notably negative (−31.5), while dissertation support is comparatively positive (+5.6). Codify what works in project supervision—milestones, exemplars, predictable touchpoints—and reuse it in taught modules. Standardise feedback formats, run regular calibration, and embed feed‑forward. Stabilise operational delivery by naming a single source of truth for course communications and maintaining predictable schedules. These steps address the recurring pain points students identify in feedback and assessment.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
Student Voice Analytics turns open‑text survey comments into trackable priorities for feedback and biomedical sciences. It quantifies sentiment and topic share over time, benchmarks against the wider subject area, and surfaces cohort differences so you can target action where it moves sentiment most. You can drill from provider to programme, export concise summaries for module teams and boards, and evidence change with like‑for‑like comparisons across disciplines and demographics.
Request a walkthrough
Book a Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
-
All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
-
Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
-
Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
More posts on feedback:
More posts on biomedical sciences (non-specific) student views: