Do learning resources set E&E engineering students up for success?
Yes. For Electrical and Electronic Engineering students, timely access to labs, specialist software and transparent assessment guidance strengthens engagement and attainment; gaps arise when access is uneven or criteria are opaque. Across the UK, learning resources is a National Student Survey (NSS) theme covering physical and digital provision and trends strongly positive overall (index +33.6), though disabled students’ tone trails peers by −7.4 points. Within Electrical and Electronic Engineering, sentiment is more divided, with 51.2% Positive, and concerns cluster around marking: comments on marking criteria account for 5.6% of discussion and carry a −48.8 tone. These signals frame how we interpret students’ perspectives below.
Starting an educational journey in electrical and electronic engineering benefits when learning resources work seamlessly for both students and staff. Textbooks, lab equipment and digital platforms sit at the core of delivery and shape how effectively students interact with their programmes. Student surveys and text analysis provide direct evidence of where resources help or hinder progression. As digital technology reshapes provision, teams need to monitor availability and usage and adapt so that resources support a diverse cohort.
How accessible are labs, study spaces and digital tools from day one?
Early access to labs, study spaces and software reduces friction and sets expectations. The pandemic exposed weaknesses in flexible access, especially for students in remote locations or with disabilities. In response, students increasingly turn to open online content to augment limited provision. Programmes should provide accessible formats by default, make assistive routes visible at the point of need, and simplify off‑campus access. Extending service hours and consolidating links to core platforms help full-time and younger cohorts adopt the good practices often seen among mature and part-time students. Resource readiness checks before term start prevent bottlenecks in high‑demand labs and software.
How does course delivery shape understanding and engagement?
Engineering learning relies on a tight blend of theory and practice. Students engage more when staff align lecture material, labs and online content and when the timetable is stable. Where remote elements remain, set expectations for format, interaction and materials so the experience is predictable. Consistent digital signposting and quick‑start guides at module launch help students focus on applying concepts rather than hunting for materials.
How do students navigate and apply course content?
Students need current textbooks, slides and software such as MATLAB, with module objectives and self‑study resources that map to assessments. Staff should review materials each term, use plain language in guidance and provide worked examples that bridge to real‑world contexts. Naming an owner for resource updates per subject area, with short student updates on fixes, sustains confidence that content remains relevant.
How should we evaluate staff performance in this context?
Students value staff who explain complex concepts well and respond promptly. Variation in materials and turnover disrupt continuity, so programmes should prioritise ongoing professional development, peer sharing of teaching resources and light‑touch calibration so students encounter consistent standards across modules. Collecting and acting on student feedback, then closing the loop with brief summaries, maintains trust in delivery.
What role do university facilities play?
Libraries, study spaces and computer labs enable both theory and experimentation. When software versions, licences and equipment keep pace with teaching, students complete assignments and test ideas more effectively. Overcrowding and licence shortages undermine that experience, so teams should track capacity, adjust booking policies and publish fixes. Student comments on facilities often highlight what works; programmes can amplify these strengths through better signposting at assessment peaks.
What do students say about feedback and assessment?
Assessment design and marking standards shape how students use resources. E&E students focus most on feedback and marking, and the tone turns negative when criteria and expectations are hard to interpret. Programmes can respond by publishing annotated exemplars and checklist‑style rubrics, showing how criteria map to learning outcomes, and agreeing a visible service level for feedback. Short marker calibration activities reduce variance between modules, and clear ownership of assessment communications limits confusion.
What does the student experience with learning resources look like?
Students emphasise quality, relevance and availability. They supplement provision with external platforms when institutional resources lag behind industry expectations or when access is constrained. They ask for more interactive, hands‑on learning through labs and simulations that mirror professional practice. Continuous dialogue with students, targeted accessibility improvements and routine readiness checks keep resources aligned with fast‑moving engineering curricula.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
Student Voice Analytics shows where resources help or hinder learning by tracking topic volume and sentiment over time for this discipline. You can drill down from institution to school or programme, compare like‑for‑like across Common Aggregation Hierarchy subject groups and demographics, and surface concise, exportable summaries for programme and service teams. The platform helps you prioritise fixes that matter in E&E, such as assessment clarity, resource readiness for specialist labs and software, and accessibility improvements that close gaps for disabled students.
Book a Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and standards and NSS requirements.
More posts on learning resources:
- Do history students prefer digital or traditional learning resources?
- Are computer science students satisfied with learning resources?
- Are learning resources meeting the needs of health sciences students?
- Do better learning resources improve outcomes for economics students?
More posts on electrical and electronic engineering student views:
- How should electrical and electronic engineering students choose modules?
- What do electrical and electronic engineering students say about their teaching staff?
- Do electrical and electronic engineering students prioritise hands-on learning over theory?
- Are assessment methods working for electrical and electronic engineering students?