What do art students need from learning resources?
Art students need reliable studio access, accessible and well-signposted digital platforms, and timely operational information so they can create, iterate and use feedback effectively. Sector evidence from the learning resources theme in National Student Survey (NSS) comments shows most students feel supported (67.7% positive), but an accessibility gap persists for disabled students (−7.4 index points). Within art, comments concentrate on the study environment: general facilities account for 13.4% of feedback and read positively overall (index +19.9), while library provision is a strong asset (index +60.4). Addressing timetabling and access frictions in art tends to yield the quickest gains for students.
How should art students balance traditional and digital resources?
Students benefit when programmes integrate tactile practice and digital capability from the outset. Traditional supplies and studio processes build technique and material awareness; digital tools expand experimentation, pace and collaboration. Staff should provide routes that help students navigate both spaces: accessible reading lists that point to physical and online collections, inductions that pair technical workshops with software basics, and assessment briefs that legitimise mixed-media workflows. Text-mining and online archives accelerate research for history and theory modules, while sketchbooks and maquettes still underpin iterative making. Consistent signposting and alternative formats reduce friction for disabled students and those studying off campus.
Do students have equitable access to studio spaces?
Access works when institutions prioritise availability, reliability and safety. Scheduled access that maps to peak making and installation periods, transparent booking rules, rapid fault reporting with visible status, and clear ownership keep facilities usable. Space allocation should consider disciplines needing large footprints such as sculpture and installation, alongside cohort growth and assessment windows. Where capacity is tight, extended hours and flexible access windows help students balance studio time with employment and commuting. Institutions should track access issues weekly and close the loop with short updates so students see progress and know workarounds.
How does feedback and critique drive learning?
Critique is a core learning activity in art. Students make the fastest progress when feedback is timely, specific and usable for the next task. Tutors should align comments to the assessment brief and marking criteria, use annotated exemplars to show standard, and set realistic turnaround expectations. Peer critique builds confidence and conceptual range if staff frame sessions with clear prompts and roles. Digital tools support this rhythm by enabling quick capture of notes, image mark-up and short video reflections, helping students act on advice in their next iteration.
How should libraries support art students’ research and practice?
Libraries remain central to both studio and academic work. Collections should combine specialist monographs, journals and image-rich catalogues with robust digital access to e-books, archives and multimedia. Targeted skills sessions on visual research, image rights and database use help students build efficient research habits and avoid last-minute scrambles. Embedding library content in module sites and sequencing readings to match making phases strengthens take-up. For commuter and part-time students, off-campus access that is simple and well documented reduces friction.
Which technological tools and software matter most?
Programmes should provide baseline access to industry-relevant software and hardware, with scaffolded training that respects different starting points. Drawing tablets, 3D printers and high-resolution scanners extend what students can prototype; packages for image, vector, motion and 3D work broaden outputs. Staff should normalise help routes, from drop-ins to quick-start guides and short refreshers aligned to assessment milestones. Ensure technology complements rather than displaces foundational techniques, and surface accessible alternatives where licensing or hardware constraints could exclude students.
How can institutions reduce material costs for students?
Material costs can throttle experimentation and narrow outcomes. Institutions can mitigate this by publishing transparent cost expectations by module, offering lending schemes for equipment, and negotiating supplier discounts. Small-grant pots tied to assessment briefs, recycled materials stores, and short vendor residencies help students access durable, fit-for-purpose materials. Alumni and local partners often support targeted bursaries when the case for creative impact is explicit.
What should institutions do next?
- Prioritise facilities and access. Name an owner for studios, publish maintenance and availability, and provide weekly updates on changes and fixes.
- Systematise feedback quality. Use exemplars, checklist rubrics and feedback timelines, and explain how students should apply comments to the next brief.
- Lift discoverability. Provide single-location signposting for core platforms, kit bookings and reading lists, with quick-start guides at the start of each module.
- Close the accessibility gap. Offer alternative formats and assistive routes at the point of need, and track resolutions so students see progress.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
Student Voice Analytics turns open-text student comments into focused, year-by-year priorities for learning resources in art. It lets you compare patterns across cohorts and sites, pinpoint friction in facilities, timetabling and communications, and evidence improvements in feedback practice and library use. Teams can export concise, programme-ready summaries to brief staff, set targets and demonstrate impact to students.
Request a walkthrough
Book a Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
- All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
- Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
- Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
More posts on learning resources:
- Are learning resources supporting medical students effectively?
- Are biomedical sciences students getting the learning resources they need?
- Are computer science students satisfied with learning resources?
- What learning resources do business management students say they need most?