Student Voice Analytics vs Relative Insight for universities

Student Voice Analytics specialises in UK-HE student comments with sector benchmarks, all-comment coverage, and TEF-ready outputs aligned with OfS quality and standards guidance—usually the better fit for NSS/PTES/PRES/module-evaluation use cases where governance and data protection matter, including ICO UK GDPR expectations. For executive summaries, Student Voice AI’s own LLMs run on Student Voice AI-owned hardware, so no data leaves our systems. Relative Insight excels at comparative text analytics across domains (marketing, CX, EX); see their official overview.

Relative Insight alternatives for universities (UK HE)

If you’re evaluating Relative Insight alternatives specifically for NSS/PTES/PRES/module comments, Student Voice Analytics is purpose-built for UK‑HE with benchmarks, data residency options, and TEF‑ready evidence. Use Relative Insight when your primary job is cross‑group comparison rather than sector‑specific reporting.

Compare Student Voice Analytics and Relative Insight for NSS/PTES/PRES

Both tools analyse text at scale. The key difference: benchmarks + all‑comment coverage (Student Voice Analytics) vs comparison‑led discovery (Relative Insight).

Who this comparison is for

  • Directors of Planning, Quality, Student Experience, and Learning & Teaching
  • Institutional survey leads (NSS, PTES, PRES, UKES) and module evaluation owners
  • BI/Insights teams weighing comparison-led tools vs sector-specific analytics
  • Faculty/School leadership preparing TEF/Board-ready narratives

Quick verdict (why Student Voice Analytics often wins in UK HE)

  • Purpose-built for universities: taxonomy & sentiment tuned for HE surveys and language.
  • Sector benchmarking: prioritise what’s distinctive vs typical to focus action.
  • Evidence for panels: all-comment coverage, reproducibility, TEF-style narratives, and clear data protection (residency, access, retention).

Governance & data protection: quick decision points

  1. Institutional reporting (TEF/QA/Board)? Prefer Student Voice Analytics.
  2. All-comment coverage and sector benchmarks required? Choose Student Voice Analytics.
  3. Data residency and access constraints? Student Voice Analytics processes on Student Voice AI-owned hardware with UK/EU options; no data sent to public LLM APIs.
  4. Exploratory comparison-led discovery? Consider Relative Insight for cohort/segment differences (pair with Student Voice Analytics for institutional evidence).

Frame outputs alongside OfS NSS guidance so stakeholders can evidence coverage, benchmarks, and governance decisions.

Common buyer scenarios (and the better fit)

Institution-wide reporting with TEF/QA scrutiny

You need reproducible categorisation, sector context, and BI-ready outputs.

Better fit: Student Voice Analytics

Exploratory comparisons across cohorts/segments

You want to uncover linguistic differences between groups or time periods.

Better fit: Relative Insight

All-comment coverage + sector benchmarks

Avoid sampling bias and anchor decisions in sector context.

Better fit: Student Voice Analytics

Marketing/CX/EX comparisons beyond HE

You need a versatile platform for non-HE datasets.

Better fit: Relative Insight

Feature-by-feature

Dimension Student Voice Analytics Relative Insight
Primary focus UK-HE student feedback (NSS/PTES/PRES/UKES, modules) Comparative linguistics across domains
Core strength Sector-specific taxonomy & sentiment + benchmarks Compare datasets to surface differences/similarities
Coverage All comments processed (no sampling) Varies by project design
Benchmarks Included sector context to prioritise actions Typically custom/DIY
Governance & reproducibility Versioned runs; audit-ready documentation; TEF-style outputs Depends on local process and documentation
Data protection & residency Processing on Student Voice AI-owned hardware; UK/EU residency options; no data sent to public LLM APIs Depends on deployment and data pathways
Reporting & BI Insight packs + BI exports (consistent schemas) and raw data feeds Visual comparisons and differences analysis
Best when… You need decision-grade, HE-specific evidence You want comparison-led discovery across cohorts/brands

Request a walkthrough

Book a free Student Voice Analytics demo

See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and reporting designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.

  • All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
  • Versioned outputs with TEF-ready reporting.
  • Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
Prefer email? info@studentvoice.ai

UK-hosted · No public LLM APIs · Same-day turnaround

Notes on Relative Insight (for fairness)

  • What it does well: finds statistically significant differences between groups; powerful for hypothesis generation.
  • Buyer fit: teams prioritising comparison-led discovery over sector-specific benchmarks and TEF-style reporting.
  • Reality check: for institutional HE reporting, you’ll still need governance, benchmarks, and reproducibility—plan for that in your process.

Editor’s note: Summaries are based on publicly-available materials and typical buyer experiences; verify specifics during procurement.

In-house LLM summaries (no external transfer)

  • Same benefits, safer path: Executive-ready summaries and narrative polish are generated by Student Voice AI’s own LLMs.
  • On our hardware: All inference runs on Student Voice AI-owned infrastructure; no data is sent to public LLM APIs.
  • Residency options: UK/EU processing aligned to institutional policy.
  • Strict controls: prompts and outputs are versioned and logged; access follows least-privilege.

Head-to-head pilot (decide in one sprint)

  1. Scope: choose one current survey (e.g., NSS) + one back-year.
  2. Export: comments + metadata (programme, CAH, level, mode, campus; demographics as permitted).
  3. Run Student Voice Analytics: process all comments; deliver categories, sentiment, sector benchmarks, BI exports.
  4. Run Relative Insight: identical corpus; configure comparison groups (e.g., departments, campuses, years).
  5. Score: coverage %, time-to-insight, category coherence, benchmark availability, BI friction, documentation for panels.
  6. Decide: map to TEF/Board deadlines and governance requirements.

Feature deep dives

Comparisons vs Benchmarks

Relative Insight shines when your key job is comparing groups. Student Voice Analytics adds sector benchmarks so you can prioritise actions that are truly distinctive, not just different within your own data.

Governance & reproducibility

For institutional use, TEF/QA panels expect traceability and year-on-year comparability. Student Voice Analytics provides versioned runs and audit-friendly outputs; with Relative Insight, ensure your internal process covers documentation and repeatability.

Reporting & BI

Student Voice Analytics delivers BI-ready exports and TEF-style narratives; Relative Insight’s visual differences are a strong exploratory companion. Many teams use both—Student Voice Analytics for institutional reporting; Relative Insight for discovery in specific projects.

Best of both: a pragmatic hybrid

Use Student Voice Analytics for all-comment, benchmarked institutional runs. Use Relative Insight to explore differences within a department, campus, or provider comparison—then bring insights back into the Student Voice Analytics evidence pack for decisions.

Risks & mitigations

Sampling bias

Analysing subsets to save time can miss critical themes.

Mitigation: Student Voice Analytics all-comment coverage; use comparisons for exploration, not as your sole institutional method.

Comparisons without context

“Different” isn’t always “important.”

Mitigation: use sector benchmarks to separate distinctive issues from normal variation.

Governance gaps

Exploratory tools can lack audit trails if not process-controlled.

Mitigation: version runs, document methods, and store BI exports with data dictionaries.

Data & integration (what enables a clean run)

  • Core: comment_id, comment_text, survey_year/date
  • Programme/subject: programme_code/name, CAH code(s)
  • Level & mode: UG/PGT/PGR, mode_of_study, campus/site
  • Demographics (policy-permitting): age band, sex, ethnicity, disability, domicile
  • Org structure: faculty, school/department

Deliveries include BI-ready files and optional raw data feeds for Planning/Insights.

Procurement checklist (copy/paste)

  • Do we need sector benchmarks and TEF-style evidence for institutional reporting?
  • Is our main job comparison-led discovery or sector-specific decision support?
  • Can we guarantee all-comment coverage and reproducibility year-on-year?
  • Will outputs flow to BI/warehouse with consistent schemas and documentation?

Scoring rubric (use in your RFP)

Criterion Weight Scoring guidance
Coverage (all comments) 25% 5 = >99% processed; 3 = 80–95%; 1 = <80%
HE-specific taxonomy & sentiment 20% 5 = native HE models; 3 = tuned generic; 1 = generic only
Sector benchmarking 20% 5 = included & transparent; 3 = partial/custom; 1 = none
Governance & reproducibility 20% 5 = versioned & auditable; 3 = partial; 1 = ad-hoc
BI exports & TEF-ready outputs 15% 5 = both native; 3 = one native; 1 = custom only

Need clarity?

FAQs

Quick answers to procurement and implementation questions we hear most often.

Can we use Relative Insight alongside Student Voice Analytics?
Yes—use Relative Insight for comparison-led exploration (e.g., cohorts/campuses) and Student Voice Analytics for all-comment, benchmarked institutional reporting.
Will we lose historic comparability if we switch?
Export prior outputs and re-process to align taxonomy and sentiment across years; most institutions improve reproducibility and trend integrity.
Do you send our data to public LLM APIs?
No. Student Voice AI uses its own LLMs on Student Voice AI-owned hardware, with UK/EU residency options.
Do we need to sample?
No. Sampling introduces avoidable bias. Student Voice Analytics is designed for all-comment coverage; keep small samples only for QA/training.

Competitor snapshots

Student Voice Analytics vs Qualtrics Text iQ

  • Qualtrics fit: platform-native analytics inside Qualtrics; HE tuning required.
  • SVA fit: deterministic ML, sector benchmarks, and TEF-ready packs for NSS/PTES/PRES.
  • Deep dive: SVA vs Qualtrics Text iQ.

Student Voice Analytics vs Explorance MLY

  • MLY fit: AI topic/sentiment in Explorance Blue; check comment coverage.
  • SVA fit: benchmarked outputs and governance aligned with OfS TEF/NSS requirements.
  • Deep dive: SVA vs Explorance MLY.

Student Voice Analytics vs DIY/BI

  • DIY fit: manual coding for pilots or researcher-led projects.
  • SVA fit: sector benchmarked, OfS-ready evidence for institutional reporting.
  • Deep dive: Build vs Buy.

Related comparisons & guides

Request a walkthrough

Book a free Student Voice Analytics demo

See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and reporting designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.

  • All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
  • Versioned outputs with TEF-ready reporting.
  • Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
Prefer email? info@studentvoice.ai

UK-hosted · No public LLM APIs · Same-day turnaround

The Student Voice Weekly

Research, regulation, and insight on student voice. Every Friday.

© Student Voice Systems Limited, All rights reserved.