Are naval architecture students overloaded with work?
Yes. Student comments in the National Student Survey (NSS) show that naval architecture cohorts experience heavy assessment and timetabling pressure. In the workload category, 81.5% of comments are negative and engineering and technology subjects carry a sentiment index of −39.0. Within naval architecture, conversation about workload appears more often than in the wider sector (5.2% vs 1.8%) and is strongly negative (index −47.8), with full-time students driving most volume (72.5%) and tending more negative (−37.2). The category aggregates UK NSS open‑text on demands and scheduling, while the subject code sits within engineering and technology, helping us compare this discipline with peers across the sector.
This post looks at how naval architecture students perceive their academic demands and the effect of their workload on their educational experience. Understanding the workload in such a technical and demanding study area is critical to fostering an environment where students can thrive. By analysing student surveys and feedback, we pinpoint concerns and practical actions. This blog explores multiple facets of the naval architecture course load, examining issues that contribute to workload concerns and how teams can respond.
What are students saying about workload levels?
Feedback from naval architecture students highlights a persistent concern: the size and intensity of their academic and practical workloads. Many report feeling overwhelmed by the volume of assignments, projects, and detailed technical learning. These demands impede daily routines, reducing time for rest and extracurricular activities, and students often seek more structured guidance from academic staff. The implication is to sequence assessments at programme level, publish an assessment calendar, and describe expected effort for tasks so students can plan against timetables. Targeting full-time cohorts aligns with what we see in NSS open text, where these groups drive volume and negativity about workload.
Where do time management struggles come from?
Juggling various projects, tight deadlines, and extensive coursework places significant demands on students’ time. The need to balance coursework with hands-on practical requirements makes falling behind more likely when deadlines cluster. Teams respond by developing better scheduling frameworks that even out peak loads and by providing time budgets and brief mid-term workload check-ins. Practical planning tools and consistent signposting of expectations help students prioritise and manage pace.
How does workload affect mental health?
Students frequently describe stress and anxiety resulting from pressure to meet academic standards. Balancing coursework, projects and practical training can lead to burnout, hindering focus and attainment. Programmes that normalise early help-seeking and provide routine access to counselling and stress management workshops see better engagement. Aligning assessment timing with known pressure points and offering proactive pastoral contact can mitigate overload and support wellbeing.
What support gaps do students describe?
Students often experience insufficient support when navigating complex theoretical and practical tasks. They ask for more than ad hoc advice: they want proactive, predictable contact and feedback that helps them act. Useful measures include:
- Regular mentoring sessions tied to assessment briefs and milestones.
- Detailed, developmental feedback on assignments against marking criteria.
- Enhanced availability of staff for consultation on academic and personal concerns.
Strengthening these elements helps students manage workload and supports both attainment and confidence.
How do students build community under stress?
Shared challenges foster stronger bonds. Students form informal networks to share resources, advice and moral support. Staff can amplify this by structuring peer learning, study groups and project collaborations, and by maintaining low‑stakes social spaces that sustain belonging. This reduces isolation and distributes problem-solving across the cohort.
What should programmes change now?
- Map and smooth assessment across modules at programme level; avoid deadline bunching; publish a single assessment calendar and set a timetable change window.
- Provide task time budgets aligned to taught hours; use brief workload check-ins mid-term to catch overload early.
- Clarify assessment expectations with exemplars, checklist-style rubrics and consistent feedback turnaround, particularly where criteria feel ambiguous.
- Prioritise operational fixes (organisation, scheduling, communications) and practical planning support for cohorts most affected by workload pressure.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
Student Voice Analytics tracks workload sentiment over time and drills from provider to school/department and programme, with demographic and subject cuts. It produces succinct, anonymised summaries and export-ready tables for rapid briefing, and enables like-for-like benchmarking by subject and cohort when sector comparators are available. Teams use it to sequence assessments, monitor whether actions lift sentiment, and evidence improvements in organisation, scheduling, communications and feedback.
Request a walkthrough
Book a Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
- All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
- Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
- Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
More posts on workload:
- Are accounting students overloaded and under-supported?
- Are molecular science students carrying too much workload?
- Are computer science students right to say workload is disproportionate?
- Do mathematics students find their workloads manageable?