Do education students think learning resources meet their needs?
Published Jun 16, 2024 · Updated Oct 12, 2025
learning resourceseducationYes. Across the National Student Survey (NSS) open text dataset for the learning resources theme, which captures how students experience access to physical and digital materials, equipment and study spaces, tone is strongly positive, with 67.7% Positive and a sentiment index of +33.6 across 14,058 comments. Within education programmes across UK providers, learning resources read net positive at 29.5, yet disabled students are less positive than their peers by -7.4 index points. These sector patterns shape the analysis that follows and inform practical choices on access, accessibility and continuous improvement.
How do learning resources shape education programmes?
Learning resources shape pedagogy and professional formation. Textbooks, digital modules and simulations structure where and how students practise core teaching moves, not only what they know. Well-designed materials improve understanding and retention; outdated or poorly designed materials impede learning, so staff schedule regular review cycles and retire low-value content. Student comments highlight access and inclusivity, so programmes prioritise alternative formats by default and support accessible routes at the point of need. Extending service hours, providing single-location signposting for platforms and quick-start guides at module start helps the wider cohort and reflects practice that works well for mature and part-time students.
What challenges do Education students report about resources?
Students report a persistent gap between theory-heavy texts and classroom practice. When materials lag behind current policy or pedagogy, student teachers feel underprepared. Access barriers, especially off campus or where budgets constrain provision, slow progress and risk widening attainment gaps. A uniform set of materials rarely serves a diverse cohort; adaptive tools and accessible formats mitigate this. Alignment to assessment matters. Where the assessment brief and marking criteria are opaque, students struggle to direct study time and to use resources effectively. Annotated exemplars and checklist-style rubrics make resources and assessment cohere.
Which serve Education students better: digital or traditional resources?
Digital tools provide timely updates, multimedia and personalisation, and lower friction for iterative practice. Traditional texts offer depth and editorial rigour but bring cost and portability constraints. Education students benefit from a blend. Remote learning reads slightly positive for this subject area relative to sector, so the task is to simplify off-campus access steps, keep sign-in and resource discovery consistent, and ensure capacity for peak periods. Libraries and programme teams then set expectations on which format to use when.
How does student feedback change resource development?
Systematic feedback guides prioritisation. Triangulating NSS comments, module evaluations and usage analytics shows where concepts do not land and where access breaks. Programme teams then produce targeted explainers, short videos or interactive tasks, and preserve features that receive positive comment. A resource readiness check before term start verifies availability, compatibility and capacity, with a named owner per subject area and short updates to students when issues are fixed.
Where does resource utilisation work well?
Several universities have improved outcomes by refining discovery and practice assets. Introducing text analysis tools in resource libraries helps education students locate relevant papers quickly, shifting time from search to critique. Integrating multimedia learning aids and real-life case simulations supports varied preferences and lets pre-service teachers practise classroom management strategies in a controlled environment before placement.
What do Education students recommend?
Students ask for engaging materials that reflect real-world teaching challenges. Case studies, scenarios and simulations help bridge theory and practice. They also value interactive tools for planning and classroom management that allow safe rehearsal. Access remains a priority: enhance digital libraries and platforms so all students, irrespective of location or finances, can reach what they need. Where assessment drives learning, provide exemplars, explicit marking criteria and realistic feedback timelines so study effort aligns with outcomes.
What should programmes prioritise next?
Close the accessibility gap by auditing core systems, reading lists, booking routes and study spaces, providing alternative formats by default and publishing an accessibility backlog with resolution times. Transfer what works for mature and part-time students across the cohort through flexible access windows and clear signposting. Target subject areas with resource readiness checks before term start, and keep communication concise when issues are resolved. Use student feedback to iterate quickly so resources remain relevant, inclusive and affordable.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
Student Voice Analytics turns open text into prioritised actions for programme and library teams. You can see topic volume and sentiment over time, compare like-for-like across Education and other subject groups and by demographics, and segment to cohort or site to target interventions. Concise summaries and representative comments help you brief colleagues without trawling thousands of responses, while export-ready outputs support transparent updates on priorities and progress.
Request a walkthrough
Book a Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
-
All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
-
Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
-
Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
More posts on learning resources:
More posts on education student views: