How do education students experience feedback, and what should universities change?

By Student Voice Analytics

feedback education

Education students report a mixed picture of feedback. In the National Student Survey (NSS), the feedback category captures how students judge the usefulness and timeliness of comments on assessment, and across the sector 57.3% of feedback comments are negative. Within education, feedback is prominent (7.8% of comments) and concerns concentrate on marking criteria (index −44.8), rather than dialogue that helps students act. Cohort differences are pronounced: young students are most negative (−15.8), while part‑time students are more positive (+6.7). These patterns point to predictable turnaround, explicit criteria with exemplars, and structured feed‑forward that education students can replicate in school placements and future classrooms.

Why does feedback matter for education students?

Feedback underpins both academic progress and professional formation. Education students learn to interpret criteria, apply feed‑forward, and balance critique with support, skills they will soon enact with pupils. Embedding dialogic feedback and making expectations transparent accelerates their development as reflective practitioners who can interpret an assessment brief, map marking criteria to outcomes, and plan next steps.

How are feedback practices evolving in UK education programmes?

Providers blend formative and summative feedback, using digital platforms for speed and consistency alongside face‑to‑face conversations. Peer review, studio‑style workshops and feedback clinics build confidence and normalise dialogue. Programmes strengthen practice by publishing turnaround service levels, requiring feed‑forward statements linked to criteria, and using annotated exemplars to reduce ambiguity. These steps align with NSS trends and help stabilise experience across large cohorts.

Where do student expectations diverge from reality?

Students expect timely, specific comments that show how to improve on the next task. They often receive generic notes, especially when modules carry large enrolments or multiple markers. The NSS pattern suggests younger full‑time cohorts need more structured guidance on using feedback, while approaches from part‑time provision (staged touchpoints and short checklists) transfer well. Making criteria legible, evidenced and consistently applied addresses the sharpest pain point in Education: dissatisfaction with marking criteria.

What challenges do education students face in getting useful feedback?

Variability in depth, alignment to criteria, and timeliness limits impact. Large‑group teaching can dilute personalisation, and students report uncertainty about how feedback maps to grading standards. Programmes reduce noise by calibrating markers on shared samples, scheduling early low‑stakes tasks with fast turnaround, and signposting how to act on feedback at module level. Engaging students in co‑design of feedback formats improves fit and uptake.

How does feedback shape performance and professional readiness?

Specific, prompt comments accelerate improvement between tasks and build assessment literacy. When feedback connects explicitly to the marking criteria and includes next‑step actions, students adapt practice quickly and transfer learning to school‑based work. Vague or delayed responses weaken confidence, stall progress, and obscure standards. Prioritising actionable feed‑forward and alignment to outcomes strengthens attainment and preparedness for professional placements.

Which feedback innovations add most value for this cohort?

The highest returns come from predictable turnaround, concise rubrics with exemplars, and short “how to use your feedback” guides embedded in modules. Dialogic sessions and staged feedback points mirror practices common in part‑time modes and work well with full‑time cohorts. Light‑touch analytics that flag gaps against criteria help staff target comments, while peer review with role prompts improves group assessment and reduces friction.

What should higher education professionals change now?

Publish and monitor a feedback SLA by assessment type, and share on‑time rates with students.
Require feed‑forward: one or two specific actions tied to the marking criteria and the next assessment brief.
Calibrate markers through quick sprints using shared scripts; spot‑check comments for specificity and actionability.
Lift effective practices from part‑time provision into large full‑time modules, including staged feedback and checklists.
Close the loop visibly with concise “you said → we did” updates on format changes and turnaround.

How Student Voice Analytics helps you

Student Voice Analytics turns NSS open‑text into trackable metrics for feedback and related assessment themes. It surfaces sentiment trends, cohort differences by age, mode, disability, domicile and subject (CAH), and pinpoints where tone is weakest. Teams can drill from provider to programme, export concise anonymised summaries for module boards, and benchmark Education against like‑for‑like provision. The platform evidences improvement year on year and helps you prioritise timely, actionable feedback that students can use.

Request a walkthrough

Book a Student Voice Analytics demo

See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.

All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.

Prefer email? [email protected]