What do children's nursing students say about placement fieldwork?

placements fieldwork tripschildrens nursing

Students value placements as formative yet uneven. Across the National Student Survey (NSS), the placements fieldwork trips theme captures applied learning across subjects and reports 60.6% Positive sentiment overall (sentiment index +23.1). In children's nursing, a subjects allied to medicine area where clinical learning dominates, placements make up 25.2% of all student feedback and are only mildly positive (+4.4), so communication, logistics and mentor support become decisive. This context explains why the strongest gains come from predictable operations, prepared mentors and rapid issue resolution.

In children's nursing education, understanding the experiences of students during their placement is essential to their professional growth and readiness to care for young patients. This article examines both the beneficial insights and the obstacles students report, and how these shape training in paediatric healthcare. A substantive part of ensuring that students are heard and their feedback informs improvements involves student surveys and text analysis. By analysing feedback, institutions engage with the learning environment provided during placements. Experiences vary across settings, posing distinct challenges and rewards. Throughout placement, students apply theory and navigate complex situations, acquiring practical skills. Direct engagement with patients and multidisciplinary teams helps them understand the demands of their chosen career.

Experiencing the field: what do students say about learning environments on placement?

Students highlight the practical benefits of learning in the field and describe placements as the bridge between classroom and paediatric practice. They value hands-on experience under the guidance of mentors and the chance to understand complexity in children’s health. However, gaps in preparation and ambiguous expectations undermine confidence. Placements work best when programmes set structured expectations, provide preparatory briefings and ensure consistent on-site supervision. Mentor readiness matters: a concise mentor brief, expected contact rhythm and a short onboarding checklist at the start of each block create reliable conditions for learning.

Where does communication break down?

Communication lapses between students and clinical supervisors, and between universities and placement providers, reduce learning opportunities. Students report missed feedback windows and uncertainty about roles when updates are late or inconsistent. Programmes can reduce noise by naming owners for course communications, keeping a single source of truth for changes, publishing a short weekly “what changed and why” update and agreeing an escalation route. On site, a predictable feedback rhythm and a quick QR micro-form for raising issues, triaged within 48 hours, keep placement learning on track.

What financial and logistical barriers affect participation?

Travel costs and distant allocations strain budgets, and mismatches between academic assessments and rota patterns add pressure. Institutions should confirm site capacity before finalising timetables, declare a rota freeze window ahead of each block and synchronise assessment deadlines with placement intensity. Ring-fenced flexibility for part-time and apprenticeship students, and pre-agreed reasonable adjustments recorded against allocations, reduce friction on day one. Targeted check-ins can support mature and Black students, addressing equity gaps that appear in placement experiences across the sector.

How has COVID-19 reshaped placements?

Pandemic measures disrupted access to hands-on learning and pushed theory online. Students welcomed simulation where available, but many worried about practical skill development and consistent supervision. Programmes that combined flexible delivery with structured debriefs and explicit catch-up plans saw stronger confidence. Providers continue to balance safety, access and skill acquisition by blending ward-based exposure with simulation and guided reflection.

Do students have access to sufficient clinical training resources?

Well-equipped clinical suites and simulation tools build confidence before students enter paediatric wards. Access remains uneven. Where facilities mirror hospital environments, students feel prepared for complex cases; where resources are sparse, the scope for practice narrows. Programmes should prioritise equitable access to simulation and embed structured practice opportunities, aligning scenarios with assessment briefs and marking criteria so learning maps directly to performance expectations.

What support do students need for mental health and emotional load?

Children’s nursing exposes students to emotionally demanding situations. Regular debriefing, proactive wellbeing check-ins and trained staff who can spot distress help sustain resilience. Students consistently rate people-centred support highly; Personal Tutor references are strongly positive (index +48.7). Leveraging that strength—through consistent tutor contact during placements and signposted counselling—improves both wellbeing and learning outcomes.

What should institutions prioritise next?

• Lock in logistics early and communicate changes simply. Confirm site capacity before timetabling, publish concise weekly updates and set rota freeze windows.
• Standardise supervision. Provide a one-page mentor brief, an onboarding checklist and an expected feedback rhythm.
• Close the issue loop fast. Capture on-placement concerns via a QR form, triage within 48 hours and publish closure rates by theme.
• Design for non-standard modes and equity. Ring-fence flexible options for part-time and apprenticeship students, and schedule proactive check-ins for mature and Black students.
• Make assessment expectations unambiguous. Share usable exemplars, checklist-style rubrics and realistic turnaround times so students can act on feedback.

How Student Voice Analytics helps you

Student Voice Analytics continuously tracks placement comments and sentiment, with drill-downs by mode, age, ethnicity, disability and subject area. You can compare like-for-like across CAH subjects and demographics, segment by site or provider, cohort and year, and generate concise, anonymised summaries for placement partners and programme teams. Export-ready outputs support briefing, action planning and evidence for NSS, TEF and internal quality processes.

Request a walkthrough

Book a Student Voice Analytics demo

See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.

• All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
• Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
• Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.

Book a demo Prefer email? [email protected]

More posts on placements fieldwork trips:

• What do physiotherapy students say about placements?
• Do placements and fieldwork trips improve learning for Environmental Sciences students?
• Are midwifery placements delivering for students?
• What do students say makes social work placements work?

More posts on childrens nursing student views:

• What support do children's nursing students need to thrive?
• Does children’s nursing in the UK give students the breadth they need?
• Do children's nursing students feel well supported by learning resources?