Do politics students feel they get value for money?
Published May 30, 2024 · Updated Oct 12, 2025
costs and value for moneypoliticsNot consistently. In the National Student Survey (NSS) open-text, costs and value for money is overwhelmingly negative, with 5,994 comments showing 88.3% negative and a sentiment index of −46.7; within Politics as defined in the sector’s Common Aggregation Hierarchy, overall mood trends more positive (roughly 51.0% positive), yet when students discuss costs and value the tone drops to −56.5. That sector picture frames this case: politics students want transparent fees, applied curricula, assessment clarity and dependable contact, especially following disruption.
Tuition Fee Affordability and Value for Money?
Understanding how politics students view the cost of tuition fees and the value they glean from their education matters because it shapes their trust in the programme. Students question whether knowledge and skills align with what they pay, and whether modules equip them for practical political engagement rather than only theory. Student feedback points to curriculum review focused on applied content, case-based seminars and assessments that mirror real-world tasks. Politics cohorts often respond well to module choice and teaching staff; making those strengths prominent and mapping them to fee-covered provision improves value perceptions.
Quality of Political Education During COVID-19?
The pandemic altered delivery and raised questions about whether online provision matched the fee level. Politics thrives on debate and spontaneous exchange, which many felt suffered in virtual formats. Students valued flexibility but missed the depth of in-person seminars. Future pedagogy prioritises discussion-led online design, regular synchronous seminars, and consistent access to materials and recordings, so that delivery method aligns with fee expectations and learning aims.
Do students get enough financial transparency on how fees are spent?
Students seek a simple account of what fees include and where money goes. Institutions should publish a “total cost of study” per programme, adopt a “no surprises” approach to additional spend, and standardise cost guidance in module handbooks and the VLE. Setting service targets for reimbursements and reporting turnaround times publicly builds confidence. Engaging students in budget priorities through participatory panels strengthens trust and explains trade-offs.
Is there enough teaching contact and interaction with academics?
Politics learning relies on dialogue with academics. Where contact feels thin, students question the return on their fees. Programme teams can schedule small-group tutorials, structured office hours and feedback clinics across the term, and protect seminar time from avoidable cancellations. Availability of teaching staff often reads positively in politics, so making access routes visible and dependable helps sustain perceptions of value.
Have strikes and COVID-19 closures changed perceptions of value?
Disruptions from industrial action and closures amplify dissatisfaction with fees when missed contact is not clearly mitigated. Providers should document replacements or adjusted assessments, set out how missed learning outcomes are achieved, and be explicit about what the fee covers. Communicating this consistently reduces frustration and shows how programmes safeguard academic standards despite disruption.
Are student funding and loans adequate for politics students?
Loans often cover tuition but not living costs, pushing students into additional work that competes with study time. Providers can reduce out-of-pocket spend by expanding equipment and software access, print allowances and library-held materials; front-load information about included costs; and schedule support before cost-heavy weeks. Targeted hardship routes and timely travel reimbursements help students focus on study rather than financial management.
Are universities responding effectively to student feedback?
Teams increasingly use text analysis to prioritise actions. The next step is operational discipline: run short pulse checks after high-cost activities, close the loop with “what changed and why” updates, maintain a single source of truth for timetables and assessments, and align marking criteria and exemplars across modules. These practices raise perceived value by making delivery reliable and assessment expectations transparent.
Why are students dissatisfied with online teaching?
For many, online formats weaken debate and reduce spontaneous exchange. Programmes that design for interaction perform better: frequent live seminars, structured peer discussion, breakout problem-based activities, and assessment briefs that build from those sessions. Training for staff and students in digital seminar craft, plus predictable schedules, increases engagement and makes the mode feel worth the fee.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
- Pinpoint where value-for-money concerns are most acute for politics cohorts and track movement over time by mode, age and subject.
- Drill from institution to school and programme, providing concise anonymised summaries for academic and professional services teams.
- Compare like-for-like across subject codes and cohorts to evidence improvement, and segment by campus or site where relevant.
- Export ready-to-use tables and narratives to brief programme boards, finance and operations, and to monitor action completion.
Request a walkthrough
Book a free Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and reporting designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
- All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
- Versioned outputs with TEF-ready reporting.
- Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
UK-hosted · No public LLM APIs · Same-day turnaround
More posts on costs and value for money:
- Do UK mechanical engineering students feel they get value for money?
- Do psychology students feel their UK degree offers value for money?
- Do economics students think UK higher education offers value for money?
- Do design studies students get value for money?