Does communication shape learning for marketing students?
Yes. Across UK marketing programmes, students’ experience hinges on staff responsiveness, actionable feedback and channel fit. In the National Student Survey (NSS), the communication with supervisor, lecturer, tutor theme trends modestly positive overall (index +5.5), but tone varies by mode and support. Within marketing, students consistently praise people while seeking firmer assessment guidance: Teaching Staff sentiment is +36.0 while Marking criteria sits at −52.1. These findings shape how we analyse communication across lectures, tutorials and coursework in what follows.
Good communication forms the backbone of the educational experience for marketing students. We focus on how students interact with supervisors, lecturers and tutors, and how the tone, frequency and effectiveness of those interactions influence engagement. Regular use of student voice tools, such as pulse surveys and text analytics, helps staff understand how messages land and where to adjust approach, especially at the start of a programme when expectations are set.
How do lecturers’ communication practices shape learning in marketing?
Responsiveness and the quality of feedback drive motivation and attainment. Students value timely replies and actionable comments that map feedback to marking criteria and exemplify what “good” looks like. Given that students rate teaching staff highly yet report uncertainty around criteria, teams can align communication and assessment by publishing annotated exemplars, using concise rubrics that travel with the work, and calibrating markers to ensure consistency across the cohort. Active listening and visible adjustments in response to student voice build trust and sustain engagement across lectures, seminars and one‑to‑ones.
What is the impact of email on staff–student communication?
Email remains a core channel for clarifying content, discussing projects and resolving urgent issues, but its effectiveness depends on predictable service standards. Set programme‑wide norms for response times, define when to use VLE forums versus email versus office hours, and publish office hours with back‑up contacts during leave. Mode matters: apprenticeship learners report the lowest tone (−14.6), so predictable, asynchronous updates (e.g., weekly digests, recorded briefings) and some out‑of‑hours slots help fit communication around work patterns.
How do module leaders and tutors balance support with timely guidance?
Students depend on module leaders and tutors for interpretation of assessment briefs and study strategies. The common pain points are delayed replies and feedback that describes rather than diagnoses. Standardise how queries are handled, keep a single source of truth on the VLE, and summarise actions after meetings so students know what to do next. Reduce barriers for disabled and mature students with alternative modes (captioned recordings, written summaries) and short, proactive check‑ins at assessment pinch points.
How should university administration set standards for communication?
Administration sets the tone by defining and monitoring institution‑wide communication standards that academic teams then apply locally. Provide simple guidance on channels and response times, ensure accessible contact routes, and support staff training on constructive feedback and inclusive communication. Track response‑time compliance and recurring issues by programme, review them in programme meetings, and act within the next teaching block. This creates a consistent experience across modules and reduces missed or duplicated messages.
What dynamics matter most in student–lecturer interactions?
Students benefit when lecturers make availability explicit, use targeted office hours, and give specific, actionable feedback. Clarity on when and how to get help lowers anxiety before assessments, and brief follow‑ups after meetings sustain momentum. Balance digital with in‑person touchpoints so dialogue feels personal and developmental rather than transactional.
Where do online learning environments create communication gaps?
VLEs and collaboration tools support scale but can feel impersonal without deliberate community‑building. In marketing, remote learning sentiment is notably negative (−32.8), signalling the need for warmer interaction: short video updates, structured Q&A forums, and quick polls to surface confusion early. Regular virtual meet‑ups and small‑group discussions help maintain a learning community and make it easier to resolve misunderstandings before they affect performance.
How can coursework and assignment communication be made more effective?
Start from the assessment brief and work backwards. Use plain‑English briefs, checklist‑style rubrics, and quick exemplars at multiple grade bands. Invite early questions via VLE forums (so answers benefit the whole cohort) and signpost when to use email versus office hours. Students respond well when they can see what to do next, how it will be marked, and when they will receive feedback.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
- Analyse topic and sentiment for communication themes over time, with drill‑downs by school/department, campus/site and cohort.
- Compare marketing like‑for‑like across CAH groups and demographics (age, domicile, mode, disability, commuter status) to evidence progress against the right peer set.
- Generate concise, anonymised summaries for programme boards and external reviewers, avoiding anecdote‑driven decisions.
- Track response‑time issues and high‑impact fixes, then close the loop with students in the next teaching block.
Request a walkthrough
Book a Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
- All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
- Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
- Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
More posts on communication with supervisor, lecturer, tutor:
- Are adult nursing students getting the staff communication they need?
- What improves communication between students and supervisors, lecturers and tutors in Education?
- How can better staff–student communication boost engagement and support in psychology?
- Do law students get the academic communication they need?