The Benefits for Students of Problem-Based Learning
Updated Mar 07, 2026
Higher drop-out rates usually point to a deeper problem: students are not just leaving, they are struggling to stay motivated and perform well. Haack and Jambor highlight this risk in German engineering programmes, where at least one in three students either drops out or changes course (Haack & Jambor, 2020). UK policymakers have raised similar concerns across higher education (Department for Education, 2019). In Haack and Jambor's discussion, weak academic performance and low internal drive are among the main reasons students leave. Problem-based learning (PBL) is presented as one possible response. While the literature on PBL is extensive, this case study focuses on M. A. Almulla's work on its impact on student outcomes (Almulla, 2019).
Problem-based learning is often positioned as a strong alternative to what Almulla describes as "traditional teacher-centred didactic techniques" (Almulla, 2019). The core promise is practical: if students learn by working through problems, they may become more motivated, more reflective, and better able to apply what they know.
At its core, PBL asks students to explore, question, and create rather than passively receive information. The approach draws on John Dewey's early twentieth-century ideas and the belief that students learn more effectively when they engage with real problems and reflect on how they solve them (Delisle, 1997, as cited in Almulla, 2019). Barrows (1996, as cited in Almulla, 2019) identifies six keystones of the approach, several of which overlap with common challenges in collaborative learning and its assessment:
- Hypothetical deductive reasoning
- Cognitive flexibility
- Self-directed learning skills
- Teamwork and collegiality
- Self-identification of strengths and weaknesses
- Habits of self-reflection and self-appraisal
Drawing on earlier discussions of PBL's benefits, Almulla uses student feedback questionnaires to examine its effect on internal drive, problem-solving, how well different student needs are met, learning difficulties, transferable skills, and academic achievement. The central question is whether PBL helps students learn more confidently and effectively, not just differently.
Almulla tests twelve hypotheses. The first six examine whether problem-based learning positively affects the following aspects of the student experience:
- Internal drive for learning
- Thought processes in learning contexts, described as "learning thinking"
- How well different student needs are met
- Learning difficulties
- Transferable skills
- Academic success
The remaining six hypotheses explore how these factors influence one another, for example whether stronger internal drive for learning contributes to greater academic success. Student feedback questionnaires provide the evidence used to confirm or challenge these relationships.
Through statistical analysis of the survey results, Almulla finds relatively strong support for all six of the primary hypotheses, with student responses clustering toward the agree end of the scale. In practical terms, students associated PBL with better motivation, broader skills development, and stronger academic outcomes. For educators, the takeaway is clear: well-implemented PBL can support engagement and performance at the same time.
The main challenge the author identifies is implementation. Almulla argues that future research should produce standardised guidance so educators can apply problem-based learning more consistently and reproduce the benefits seen elsewhere in the literature. The paper also points to an important follow-on question: how do educators respond to the PBL method, and what constraints limit its use? Those constraints are likely to vary by technology, discipline, culture, and learner age, especially when institutions are supporting students who are less adaptive to problem-based learning. That makes ongoing student feedback essential if institutions want to refine PBL with evidence rather than assumptions. If your institution is introducing PBL, review open-text feedback alongside survey scores so you can see whether motivation and problem-solving are actually improving.
FAQ
Q: How do students' personal narratives and experiences influence their perception of problem-based learning (PBL) and its impact on their learning outcomes?
A: Students' personal narratives show how PBL feels in practice, not just how it performs in survey scores. Their comments reveal whether collaboration feels motivating or frustrating, whether problem-solving activities build confidence, and whether group dynamics support or hinder learning. Those qualitative insights help educators understand why one student experiences PBL as energising while another finds it difficult, so teaching strategies can be adapted to support a wider range of learners.
Q: What specific text analysis methods could be employed to analyse student feedback on problem-based learning, and what insights could these methods uncover about the effectiveness of PBL?
A: Sentiment analysis for UK universities, thematic analysis, and natural language processing (NLP) can all help interpret student feedback on problem-based learning. Sentiment analysis shows the emotional direction of comments, thematic analysis surfaces recurring themes such as collaboration or challenge, and NLP can detect subtler patterns in how students describe confidence, confusion, or progress. Used together, these approaches show not just whether students respond positively to PBL, but which parts of the approach are helping and which need refinement.
Q: In what ways can the integration of Student Voice through forums, open discussions, and feedback platforms enhance the implementation and refinement of problem-based learning strategies?
A: Forums, open discussions, and feedback platforms help educators refine PBL continuously rather than waiting for end-of-module complaints. They make it easier to see where students value collaboration, where instructions are unclear, and where group work or workload needs adjustment. Anonymous channels can surface issues students may hesitate to raise publicly. Acting on that feedback improves the design of PBL and reinforces that students are active participants in shaping their learning experience, which is central to what student voice means in higher education.
References
[Source Paper] Almulla, M. A. (2019). The Efficacy of Employing Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Approach as a Method of Facilitating Students’ Achievement. IEEE Access, 7, 146480-146494.
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2945811
[1] Department for Education. (2019, 7 March 2019). Education Secretary warns universities over dropout rates.
Available Here
[2] Haack, M., & Jambor, T. N. (2020, 27-30 April 2020). Influence of Problem-Based Learning on Student Performance. Paper presented at the 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON).
DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON45650.2020.9125113
Request a walkthrough
Book a free Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and reporting designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
- All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
- Versioned outputs with TEF-ready reporting.
- Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
UK-hosted · No public LLM APIs · Same-day turnaround
Related Entries
- Project-Based Learning in Engineering
- Active Learning Strategies
- Trust and Active Learning
- Supporting the Less Adaptive Student
- The Effect of Instruction on Learning- Case Based Versus Lecture Based