What do CAM students say about their teaching staff?

teaching staffcomplementary and alternative medicine

CAM students describe teaching teams as a core strength when delivery is structured, practice-based and well communicated, but they want steadier placement operations and transparent assessment. Across UK higher education, the National Student Survey (NSS) Teaching Staff theme comprises 25,281 comments with 78.3% Positive and a sentiment index of +52.8, setting a high baseline for trusted staff behaviours. In complementary and alternative medicine, ~517 comments indicate Teaching Staff sentiment is strongly positive (+38.9), while day-to-day logistics around practice learning often shape the overall experience.

What are the unique requirements in CAM education?

Teaching complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) demands staff who combine deep theoretical knowledge with practical proficiency in therapies and treatments. The emphasis on holistic health requires fluency in how body, mind and spirit interact. Students expect respectful treatment of traditional healing practices alongside their integration with contemporary science, so teaching teams need to keep knowledge current and evidence-informed. Because practice learning features prominently in CAM student feedback, staff also steward the operational experience that surrounds placements and clinics, not just the classroom.

What qualifications and expertise do teaching staff need?

Students judge credibility through both formal qualifications and a substantive record of professional practice. A lecturer in herbal medicine, for example, should pair appropriate degrees with active engagement in professional bodies and current practice. Ongoing professional development is non-negotiable to align traditional knowledge with modern educational standards and clinical evidence. Consistency across the teaching team matters, as students compare interactions and expect reliable guidance, timely support and alignment with programme aims.

How should teaching approaches address diversity and inclusion?

CAM draws on global healing traditions with rich cultural contexts. Students value teaching that both respects and critically analyses these traditions, situating them within contemporary ethical and scientific frameworks. Staff should cultivate a learning environment where multiple paradigms can be discussed, compared and applied with cultural competence. Targeted development in cultural literacy and inclusive pedagogy strengthens this integration and prepares graduates for diverse client communities.

How do practical experience and teaching methods work together?

Students learn best when theory and practice reinforce each other. Workshops, supervised clinics and structured simulations translate complex concepts into professional judgement. Students respond well when staff make the rationale explicit: why a method is used, how to carry it out safely, and how to evaluate outcomes. Because practice-based learning dominates CAM student commentary, investing in reliable timetabling, briefings and placement preparation amplifies the benefits of hands-on teaching.

Why do student-teacher relationships matter in CAM?

Mentorship and accessibility shape progression in skills-based programmes. Students look to educators for expert knowledge in acupuncture, herbal medicine or bodywork, but also for role modelling of therapeutic values such as empathy, reflection and professional boundaries. When staff actively invite and use student feedback, the curriculum stays relevant and responsive, and the learning culture feels coherent across modules and sites.

How should assessment and feedback work in CAM?

Assessment must evidence both understanding and competent practice. Written work can test critical thinking and synthesis, while observed practice assesses technique, safety and professional conduct. Students report the best outcomes when marking criteria are transparent, exemplars show “what good looks like”, and feedback is timely and actionable. Co-calibration within teaching teams reduces noise that students experience as inconsistency across modules and assessors.

Where are the improvement opportunities?

Two areas recur in CAM feedback: operational predictability and assessment clarity. Students want a single source of truth for timetabling and placement communications, with named ownership and short, regular updates. Treat placements as a designed service by confirming site capacity early, stating allocation principles, and closing feedback loops while on site. In assessment, publish annotated exemplars, use checklist-style rubrics and co-moderate to align expectations. Protect the strong baseline for teaching staff by keeping high-trust behaviours visible: predictable availability, structured sessions and guidance students can act on.

What does this mean for providers?

The sector-wide baseline for teaching staff is strong, and CAM students echo that strength when delivery is structured and practice-ready. The gains come from making operations predictable and assessment transparent, so positive experiences with teaching are not undermined by avoidable friction. Prioritise consistent staff behaviours, codify what students praise in delivery, and use targeted adjustments in placements, scheduling and marking to lift outcomes for each cohort.

How Student Voice Analytics helps you

Student Voice Analytics continuously tracks NSS open-text on Teaching Staff and CAM, showing topic shares and sentiment over time so programme and school teams can focus on what moves the dial—practice learning operations, assessment clarity and the staff behaviours students value. You can compare like-for-like against the sector by CAH subject family and by student segments, drill from institution to programme and cohort, and export concise, anonymised summaries and tables for boards and briefings. The result is a clear, evidence-led view of where to act and how to demonstrate improvement.

Request a walkthrough

Book a Student Voice Analytics demo

See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.

• All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
• Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
• Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.

Book a demo Prefer email? [email protected]

More posts on teaching staff:

• Should teaching approaches adapt for combined studies students?
• What do biosciences students say about teaching staff?
• Theological education: student perspectives on teaching staff
• What are computer science students saying about their teaching staff?

More posts on complementary and alternative medicine student views:

• Does the CAM curriculum offer enough breadth and depth for students?
• Do placements and fieldwork work for complementary and alternative medicine students?