Do strikes disrupt learning and creativity on English Literature courses?

strike actionliterature in English

Yes. Across the National Student Survey (NSS) open-text comments, strike action emerges as one of the sector’s most negative themes: 6,683 comments (≈1.7% of all) discuss it, 92.3% are negative, only 3.4% positive, and the sentiment index sits at −57.1. In literature in English, a humanities discipline built on seminar dialogue and iterative feedback, these sector patterns explain why interruptions to staff-student contact depress learning, assessment progress and creative development. The category aggregates student views of industrial action across UK higher education, and although discipline-level breakouts for literature are still being populated, the strength of the sector signal shapes how we interpret the experiences described below.

How do literature courses work, and why does this matter during strikes?

Literature courses rely on consistent interaction between students and staff. Seminar-based learning enables students to test interpretations and anchor critical theory in discussion. Programmes are structured around direct engagement with literature experts, so staff withdrawal immediately disrupts learning. The disruption delays the development of analytical skills and complicates progression to assessments. Many students empathise with their lecturers while simultaneously grappling with the loss of interaction time that fuels comprehension and critical thinking. When seminars are cancelled and feedback on written work is postponed, sustained engagement with texts becomes harder.

What does strike action do to learning and assessment in literary studies?

The aftermath of strike action is acute in literary studies, where access to seminars and timely feedback drives attainment. Strikes cancel classes and delay feedback on essays and assignments that scaffold learning. Disruptions hinder the analysis of complex texts and the development of sophisticated arguments, particularly when students cannot test ideas with peers and instructors. Interruptions alter timetables, increase stress and create uncertainty about meeting deadlines essential for progression. While many students support the rationale for industrial action, they must balance solidarity with anxiety about their academic advancement. Because critical engagement depends on a collaborative environment rather than solitary reading, strike periods stifle academic growth and creative exploration.

How do students describe faculty strikes on literature programmes?

Student perspectives combine solidarity and frustration. Many recognise the need for improved working conditions yet report lost seminars, reduced participation opportunities and late feedback on written work. Survey responses show solidarity colliding with practical concerns about educational setbacks, including longer-term worries about learning gaps and future attainment. Engaging students directly and using their feedback helps institutions calibrate mitigation that supports both staff and students.

How does strike action affect creative output?

Creative writing and other practice-based components rely on iterative critique. Workshops and one-to-one supervision refine drafts and build technique. During strikes, cancelled workshops and delayed feedback interrupt the creative process and can stall portfolio development. Students may understand the tactics of industrial negotiation yet still worry about the impact on projects, progression and the craft of storytelling, which thrives on continuous mentorship. Providers should maintain feedback loops and workshop facilitation through alternative routes where feasible to protect learning and creative outputs.

What should institutions change next?

With NSS sentiment this negative in strike action, the operational response matters. Maintain a single source of truth that states what is affected, what is unchanged and what mitigation exists. Publish concise updates on changes, reasons and next steps. Protect continuity by pre-planning catch-up windows, alternative activities and stable assessment policies, including explicit marking timelines. Log lost teaching hours and map recovery actions by module, track student-reported issues and publish resolution rates. Prepare subject-sensitive mitigation for literature programmes, and tailor communications for full-time, younger cohorts while ensuring parity for all students.

How Student Voice Analytics helps you

• Quantifies topic and sentiment for strike action within literature in English, with drill-downs from provider to school, department and programme.
• Surfaces segment-level patterns by discipline and demographics to target mitigation, timetabling recovery and assessment communications.
• Produces concise, anonymised summaries for briefing programme teams, unions and committees, with export-ready tables for governance papers.
• Supports evidence of recovery by linking logged issues and lost teaching hours to resolution and catch-up actions, enabling transparent reporting.

Request a walkthrough

Book a Student Voice Analytics demo

See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.

• All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
• Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
• Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.

Book a demo Prefer email? [email protected]

More posts on strike action:

• How are university strikes affecting law students?
• How does strike action affect politics students in UK universities?
• Do strikes disrupt psychology students’ learning, research and wellbeing?
• What do sociology students say about strike action?

More posts on literature in English student views:

• Is English Literature course content broad enough?
• What does effective feedback look like in English Literature programmes?
• How did COVID-19 change English literature students’ experience?
• Does remote learning work for English literature students?