Does the IT curriculum match what students need and expect?
Yes—when programmes balance breadth with currency, reliable resources and transparent assessment. Across National Student Survey (NSS) open‑text comments tagged type and breadth of course content from 2018–2025, students are broadly positive (70.6% Positive across 25,847 comments), indicating that scope and variety generally land well across the sector. In Information Technology, sentiment is more mixed (53.0% Positive), with student voice prioritising dependable learning resources (10.5% of comments) and signalling that opaque marking criteria depress experience (sentiment −43.3). The category captures how students judge the scope of what they study across disciplines, while the IT subject code reflects how these issues play out in a fast‑moving applied area—where alignment to industry practice and clarity of assessment define whether breadth feels meaningful.
Courses typically range from foundational programming to complex systems and security. Student narratives emphasise alignment with industry needs and the currency of tools, datasets and cases. Modules that update iteratively and show how theory maps to application generate confidence that breadth is substantive rather than superficial.
How should course content and structure evolve?
Students value breadth when it is visible, navigable and current. Publish a one‑page content map showing core and optional topics across years, and schedule options to avoid clashes so cohorts retain real choice. Make quarterly refreshes to readings, datasets, case studies and toolchains routine in fast‑moving areas. For work‑based routes, co‑design with employers so on‑the‑job tasks map to module outcomes and are reviewed on a set cadence. These steps ensure a structured progression from fundamentals to specialism without duplication or gaps.
What shapes the IT learning experience?
Practical application drives satisfaction. Students expect labs, studios and projects that mirror the workplace and use contemporary stacks. Reliability of platforms, licences and IT facilities underpins learning; when these work, students focus on content rather than friction. Provide equivalent asynchronous materials and clear signposting so part‑time learners access the same breadth. In IT, the learning experience improves when each term blends seminars with case work, labs and projects that demonstrate breadth in practice.
How should we judge course quality and assessment?
Student feedback highlights assessment design as the lever that most affects perceived quality. Marking criteria and assessment methods attract the strongest negative tone in IT, so programmes should make expectations unmistakable: share annotated exemplars, checklist‑style rubrics and plain‑English assessment briefs that tie tasks directly to criteria. Set and meet feedback service levels with short “what to do next” summaries so students can act. These moves protect academic standards while improving perceived fairness and utility.
Do course expectations and goals match reality?
Many IT students choose the subject for employment‑focused study in areas like cloud, UI/UX and cybersecurity. Where modules lag current practice or repeat content, expectations dip. Run an annual content audit, track quick wins to closure, and invite students in week‑4 and week‑9 pulse checks to flag missing or duplicated topics. Programmes that evidence timely change sustain confidence that breadth maps to real‑world roles.
What delivery and support models work best?
Operational dependability lifts student experience in IT. Keep a single source of truth for timetabling and programme updates, with short weekly notices and named owners for changes. Remote and hybrid elements work when virtual labs, simulations and discussion spaces are designed into modules rather than bolted on. Maintain straightforward routes to support—personal tutors, office hours and service status pages—so students know where to go and what will happen next.
Where do students experience difficulties and challenges?
Fast‑moving content risks becoming dated and dense. Prioritise progressive build‑up of knowledge with practical examples that reduce cognitive load, and retire obsolete material promptly. Facilities and software friction impedes learning; publish status pages and clear fix ownership to reduce downtime. Collaboration also needs scaffolding: design group tasks with staged deliverables and transparent contribution tracking to improve both experience and perceived fairness.
How should staff act on course feedback for improvement?
Use short, regular pulses to capture what to refresh now versus later, and communicate the outcomes visibly. Share “you said, we did” updates that close the loop. Protect optionality in timetabling to keep breadth genuine, and provide equivalent asynchronous routes for flexible learners. These actions move student sentiment from mixed to positive by showing that feedback translates into timely, substantive change.
What works in distance learning for IT?
Active online components—virtual labs, containerised environments and real‑time walkthroughs—best replicate hands‑on learning. Combine recorded explainers with live problem‑solving sessions, and ensure assessment rubrics are visible within the virtual learning environment. Clear routes to technical help and pre‑flight checks for tool access reduce attrition and support consistent engagement.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
- Track movement in student sentiment on breadth and content by cohort, mode and demographic, with exportable summaries for programme and module teams.
- Drill from institution to school/department and subject group to compare like‑for‑like peers in Information Technology.
- Generate concise, anonymised action briefs that show what changed, for whom and where to act next—ready for Boards of Study, Annual Programme Reviews and student–staff committees.
- Evidence improvement by linking topic shifts (e.g., assessment clarity, resources, timetabling) to specific interventions over time.
Request a walkthrough
Book a Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
- All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
- Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
- Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
More posts on type and breadth of course content:
- Is the content in Childhood and Youth Studies broad and relevant?
- What do students want from environmental sciences course content?
- Do electrical and electronic engineering students prioritise hands-on learning over theory?
- What do UK law students want from course content?