Are midwifery students getting the delivery they need?
Mostly, but the experience hinges on placements and reliable programme operations. In the National Student Survey (NSS), delivery of teaching captures how students judge structure, pacing, interaction and clarity across providers, and it trends positive, with 60.2% Positive responses. Within practice‑based courses like midwifery, students in subjects allied to medicine report a strong delivery tone overall (+35.8), yet the cohort’s conversation is dominated by placements, which account for 17.8% of comments and sit near neutral at −0.8. Staff availability stands out as a strength (+53.1). These patterns explain why students value inspirational, practice‑anchored teaching while pressing for tighter timetabling, clearer communications and dependable online sessions.
What teaching approaches do students say work in midwifery?
Students celebrate dynamic, supportive teaching that links theory to practice. They describe the most effective sessions as those that use authentic cases, invite discussion and build in practical workshops. Availability and responsiveness of staff underpin confidence; timely guidance from lecturers and personal tutors helps students translate complex concepts into safe clinical action. Programmes that scaffold learning with worked examples, short formative checks and explicit signposting of “what to do next” retain engagement across diverse cohorts.
What turns online platforms into barriers rather than supports?
Disorganised virtual learning environments slow study and add stress. Students report difficulty locating core materials, inconsistent folder structures and unreliable performance. They want a single source of truth for each module, consistent labelling, and timely release of recordings and slides. Staff can reduce friction by standardising layouts, publishing concise “what changed and why” updates, and offering quick how‑to guides so students can use platforms efficiently alongside placement demands.
How do audio and interaction issues online affect learning?
Poor audio and limited interactivity undermine understanding of clinical terminology and procedures. When students cannot hear or contribute, motivation dips and questions go unanswered. Using quality microphones, structured chat moderation and short breakout tasks lifts participation. Brief pulse‑checks at the end of sessions surface issues early and make it easier to iterate delivery mid‑module.
Where does practical skills preparation still fall short?
Students describe uneven readiness for procedures such as cannulation and suturing when hands‑on practice is squeezed by remote delivery or busy placement periods. Programmes that integrate simulation with targeted in‑person skills labs, aligned directly to assessment briefs and placement learning outcomes, give students the repetition and feedback they need. Treating placements as a designed service—early allocations, a clear change window, and in‑situ feedback—strengthens the bridge between campus and clinical settings.
What is the role and the limit of simulation in midwifery?
Simulations provide safe repetition and help build muscle memory, but they cannot fully capture patient nuance. Students respond best when simulations are realistic, debriefs are structured, and learning feeds forward into the next clinical encounter. Scheduling smaller, more frequent sessions and pairing them with short exemplars of good practice helps students transfer skills to placements.
Why do students continue to ask for more on-site learning?
Face‑to‑face time supports the tacit, relational aspects of midwifery. Students want more supervised practice, observation of complex cases and opportunities to apply judgement under guidance. Institutions can prioritise on‑site days for activities that require presence—skills labs, simulation assessments and case‑based seminars—and use asynchronous materials to protect these hours from avoidable drift.
What should programmes change now?
- Tighten the operational rhythm. Name an owner for timetables and programme communications, publish weekly updates, and keep a visible action log students can trust.
- Provide parity for students balancing placements and other commitments. Release core materials predictably, chunk longer sessions, and make assessment briefings accessible asynchronously.
- Make assessment expectations unmistakable. Share annotated exemplars, checklist‑style marking criteria and realistic feedback turnaround expectations, so students can self‑evaluate against standards.
- Spread effective delivery habits. Use a light‑touch rubric for structure, clarity, pacing and interaction, and brief peer observations to replicate sessions that work.
- Keep a simple feedback loop. Run quick pulse checks after key blocks, review results termly with programme teams, and prioritise changes that reduce friction in organisation, timetabling and communications.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
Student Voice Analytics turns open‑text feedback into actionable priorities. For delivery of teaching and midwifery, it tracks topic and sentiment over time, compares like‑for‑like against relevant subject families and demographics, and drills from institution to programme and cohort. You get concise, anonymised summaries and export‑ready outputs so teams can evidence progress on placements, scheduling, communications and assessment clarity without trawling thousands of comments.
Request a walkthrough
Book a Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
- All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
- Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
- Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
More posts on delivery of teaching:
- Community nursing students' perspectives on teaching delivery
- What does student feedback tell us about delivery of teaching on counselling, psychotherapy and occupational therapy courses?
- Student perspectives on african and modern middle eastern studies
- Are marketing students satisfied with how teaching is delivered?