Are organisation and management issues holding back marketing students?
Yes. In the National Student Survey (NSS, the UK-wide annual survey of final-year undergraduates), the organisation, management of course theme captures students’ operational experience across timetabling, communications and change control; marketing as a marketing subject grouping in the Common Aggregation Hierarchy enables discipline-level benchmarking. The sector picture on organisation reads more negative than positive (52.2% Negative vs 43.6% Positive), with younger and full-time cohorts driving tone (70.0% of comments from young students; sentiment index −7.2, and 75.7% from full-time; index −9.5). Marketing students overall trend more positive (≈53.3% Positive and 43.0% Negative), yet scheduling and timetabling remain a friction point (sentiment index −22.1). These signals shape the priorities here: stabilise timetabling, simplify communications and modernise delivery on marketing programmes.
Listening to the student voice through NSS open-text and internal surveys provides timely diagnostics on course organisation. Analysing comments at module and programme level surfaces where timetables slip, communication channels fragment, or students need adjustments. Treating feedback as actionable evidence supports substantive changes that improve satisfaction and attainment for marketing cohorts.
Challenges in course management affect learning, placement readiness and confidence. We prioritise issues with compounding effects and translate them into visible, time-bound actions, supported by transparent communication and rapid triage so marketing students can plan, participate and progress.
How do organisation choices shape course quality in marketing?
Student feedback often highlights disjointed structures and erratic scheduling that disrupt learning. Course teams should publish timetables earlier with a defined change window, track timetable stability and minimum notice, and issue a brief weekly “what changed and why” update. Minimum metrics include response time to student queries, time-to-resolution and backlog by theme. A well-organised syllabus, consistent scheduling and a single source of truth for communications enable students to plan study and assessment and to connect theory with practice. Monthly review of the sentiment index by cohort and mode, with actions published, closes the loop and builds trust.
Why must digital marketing instruction be continuously refreshed and well delivered?
The pace of change in digital platforms means materials date quickly. Students report that outdated content and variable online delivery undermine confidence with contemporary tools and assignments. Set a baseline for digital delivery: a consistent platform, predictable structure, timely release of learning materials and assessment briefs, and active use of discussion spaces. Programme teams should audit modules each term to retire stale content, embed current case work and ensure assessment tasks align with live practice. Targeted analysis of student comments identifies gaps and guides the next content refresh.
How can we protect lecturer responsiveness without adding workload?
Workload spread across administration, research and mentoring often dilutes responsiveness on high-enrolment modules. Streamline administrative tasks with digital workflows and dedicated support roles so academic time focuses on teaching, feedback and advising. Name an operations owner for each programme and introduce rapid triage for student issues so questions route to the right person quickly. This preserves timely replies and feedback, sustaining course satisfaction and progression without overburdening staff.
How do we enhance the online learning experience?
Online environments benefit from structure and immediacy. Organise materials with logical module waypoints, use simple navigation and sequence activities so each topic builds on the last. Incorporate interactive elements such as live discussions, short polls and real-time feedback to mirror in-person dynamism. Provide regular staff updates and make help easy to access. Streamlined communication and responsive support mitigate distance and keep marketing students engaged.
How can we structure group work so it feels fair and developmental?
Group projects work best when they simulate real marketing environments and distribute responsibility transparently. Compose teams with a mix of skills and perspectives, set specific, assessable objectives and provide regular, structured feedback. Use contribution logs, interim check-ins and brief peer review so collaboration feels fair and developmental rather than risky. Active facilitation and mediation from staff reduce friction and support equitable outcomes.
How do we improve communication channels?
Students value timely, precise and consistent information. Consolidate messages into a single source of truth on the virtual learning environment, integrate Q&A spaces for quick queries and set a service level for replies. Track response times and resolution rates, publish a short weekly update and review backlogs by theme to target fixes. Training for staff on concise digital communication sustains consistency across modules and year groups.
What is the right balance between practical and theoretical content?
A strong theoretical foundation supports judgement; practical work builds capability. Design modules that use industry-aligned briefs, data and tools alongside theory, and schedule time for iteration so students can apply concepts to real scenarios. Make expectations transparent: publish assessment calendars, standardised handbooks, annotated exemplars and concise marking criteria that map to hallmarks of quality. Routine review of student comments and employer input keeps the balance responsive to market needs.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
Student Voice Analytics turns open-text comments into programme-ready priorities. It brings the organisation and management theme into one view, segmented by age, mode, disability and CAH subject group, so you can see where timetabling, communications or delivery diverge. You can drill from provider to department, programme and cohort, generate concise anonymised summaries for academic and operations teams, and compare like-for-like with sector peers. Export-ready briefings make it straightforward to share metrics and actions with timetabling, exams and student comms teams and to evidence progress year on year.
Request a walkthrough
Book a Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.
- All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
- Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
- Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.
More posts on organisation, management of course:
- How should pharmacology courses improve organisation and management?
- How well are sport and exercise sciences courses organised?
- Are education students satisfied with how their courses are organised?
- How do physiotherapy students view the organisation of their courses?