What do music students say about learning resources?

learning resourcesmusic

Music students welcome high-quality facilities and responsive staff but report friction around access and assessment information. In the National Student Survey (NSS), the learning resources theme trends positive overall with 67.7% Positive, yet an accessibility gap of −7.4 points remains between disabled and non-disabled students. Within music, facilities and people drive the tone: General facilities account for ≈9.1% of comments, Teaching Staff sentiment sits at ≈+44.0, while marking criteria draws −47.4. These sector patterns shape the strengths and challenges described below.

What works well in current learning resources?

Students value professional-grade studios, comprehensive digital materials and bookable study spaces that enable high-quality creation, rehearsal and production. Staff facilitate access and encourage collaboration, which lifts confidence and the quality of student work. Listening to student voice informs improvements and sustains a positive learning atmosphere. Continued investment and straightforward routes to access sustain momentum in music programmes.

How diverse is the educational content and how is it used?

Breadth across genres and production methods builds versatile musicians, particularly when digital archives and platforms extend beyond core texts. This variety enriches understanding and practical ability when modules integrate resources into authentic tasks rather than as optional extras. Balance matters: where content feels misaligned or uneven, motivation dips, so programme teams map resources explicitly to learning outcomes to keep learning coherent.

How do tutors’ support and feedback shape learning?

Active, prompt tutor engagement helps students use resources effectively and push creative boundaries. Consultation hours, timely email responses and actionable comments on compositions or performances build a supportive culture. Where feedback and marking criteria feel opaque, momentum stalls; annotated exemplars and checklist-style rubrics reduce ambiguity in the assessment brief and make expectations transparent.

Where do resource limitations hold students back?

Shortfalls in specialist instruments, soundproof spaces and studio slots constrain practice and project work, especially at cohort peaks. Gaps in specialist scores and musicological research slow academic progress. Departments respond with tighter booking systems and expanded digital access, but persistent pinch points benefit from named subject-level owners and resource readiness checks before and during teaching blocks.

What issues arise in instructional materials and communication?

Students report outdated or incomplete reading lists and ambiguous guidance on module content and expectations. Late updates impede preparation for assessments. Consolidated signposting to core platforms, timely announcements and sharper assessment briefs with explicit marking criteria reduce uncertainty and improve progression.

How did the pandemic change deadlines and extensions?

COVID-19 disrupted access to spaces and instruments, unevenly across modules that rely on performance. Extensions helped but varied by provider. Programmes now prioritise consistent routes for remote access to digital resources alongside robust on-campus provision, so policies balance academic rigour with wellbeing and equitable access.

What should institutions do next?

Protect high-impact facilities and staff availability, and close persistent gaps in access and assessment clarity. Prioritise accessible booking, extended hours at peaks and structured communication so students know what to use, when and how. Use NSS comment analysis to track fixes, publish short updates to cohorts, and audit accessibility so disabled students experience parity.

How Student Voice Analytics helps you

Student Voice Analytics turns open-text feedback into actionable insight for learning resources in music. It lets you:

• See topic volume and sentiment over time, and drill from institution to programme, cohort or site.
• Compare like-for-like across CAH subject groups and demographics to evidence change on access and assessment clarity.
• Target resource readiness and accessibility gaps with concise summaries for programme and service teams.
• Export shareable outputs for reports, boards and dashboards to close the loop with students.

Request a walkthrough

Book a Student Voice Analytics demo

See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.

• All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
• Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
• Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.

Book a demo Prefer email? [email protected]

More posts on learning resources:

• Do business studies students have the learning resources they need?
• What do environmental science students need from learning resources?
• Are learning resources supporting medical students effectively?
• What do sport and exercise sciences students need from learning resources?

More posts on music student views:

• How do music students harmonise ambitions and wellbeing at university?
• Are UK music students getting the right breadth of course content?
• Are communication and course issues holding back music students?
• How well organised are music courses for students?