Are midwifery placements delivering for students?

placements fieldwork tripsmidwifery

Mostly, but the experience is uneven and can fall short without disciplined programme management. Across the National Student Survey (NSS), the placements fieldwork trips theme shows a broadly positive tone (sentiment index +23.1), yet feedback from Midwifery students—part of subjects allied to medicine—shows placements dominate the conversation (17.8% of all comments) with a near‑neutral tone (−0.8). Mode and equity differences matter: part‑time students’ placement comments sit closer to neutral (+11.2), and Black students’ tone is lower (+8.1) than the wider category. This context points to practical fixes—tighten expectations, mentor readiness, logistics and communications—so placements better integrate theory and practice.

Placements are an integral part of midwifery education. They bridge the gap between classroom theory and real-world practice, offering students a hands-on approach to learning that is essential for their future careers. These placements allow midwifery students to apply their academic knowledge in clinical settings, enhancing their skills under the guidance of experienced professionals. However, students often have mixed feelings about their placement experiences. Some praise the opportunity for practical engagement and personal growth during these trips, while others voice concerns over certain aspects of their placement. Engaging with student feedback, whether through direct surveys, text analysis, or student voice initiatives, is key for understanding these varied experiences. By looking into this feedback, staff and institutions can better evaluate and adapt the educational process to meet the needs of all students. This approach emphasises the necessity of supportive learning environments that genuinely prepare midwifery students for the responsibilities they will face in their professional lives.

How should programmes set placement expectations?

Students learn more when expectations are explicit and consistent across placement sites. Programmes should standardise briefing sessions, specify requirements for completing eMORA (electronic Midwifery Ongoing Record of Achievement), and publish a single source of truth covering roles, outcomes and escalation routes. Co‑design orientation with students and include Q&A panels with experienced peers to ground guidance in real contexts. Encourage questions early and routinely. Treat placements as a designed service: set and honour a change window and keep guidance aligned across trusts.

What supervision and support do students need?

Learning quality depends on mentor readiness and predictable contact. Provide supervisors with a concise mentor brief, expected contact rhythm and simple onboarding checklist for each placement start. Calibrate supervisory practice across sites and review supervision quality with short, in‑situ feedback from students. Build an equity lens into support by scheduling proactive check‑ins for cohorts who report lower tone in placements, and resolve environment issues quickly. Maintain two‑way communication that listens and acts, not just instructs.

How do logistics shape placement learning?

Logistics either unlock or limit learning. Confirm site capacity before timetabling, map placements to student locations where feasible, and use a rota freeze window to provide stability. Where travel is unavoidable, provide practical support (transport subsidies, car‑share coordination) and publish placement allocations early. Design for non‑standard modes by ring‑fencing flexible options and clearer escalation routes for part‑time and apprenticeship students. Pre‑agree reasonable adjustments with providers and record them against allocations so support is in place on day one.

How should universities and trusts communicate during placements?

Missteps often stem from fragmented information. Establish regular coordination meetings and name an owner for timetabling and programme communications. Maintain a single source of truth for changes, publish brief weekly “what changed and why” updates, and use a designated liaison to unblock site‑level issues. Capture on‑placement concerns via a simple micro‑form, triage rapidly, and share resolution progress with students and placement partners to build trust.

How can grading remain consistent and fair across sites?

Consistency and transparency in assessment improve confidence and performance. Standardise criteria across placement settings and train practice assessors to apply them reliably. Share annotated exemplars, checklist‑style rubrics and a predictable feedback turnaround so students understand the assessment brief and marking criteria. Invite structured student feedback on assessment processes and close the loop on changes to sustain fairness.

How can students manage workload during placements?

Balance comes from timetable design and timely academic support. Integrate placement intensity into module delivery and assessment pacing, with options for part‑time study where appropriate. Provide on‑site or online academic support focused on placement contexts, and schedule regular check‑ins on wellbeing. Flex to student circumstances without diluting academic standards by making expectations and deadlines explicit and support routes obvious.

How should programmes handle extraordinary circumstances?

Disruption exposes fragility in placement management. Integrate virtual simulations to complement missed practice hours, and provide clear guidance on extensions and re‑scheduling. Maintain strong pastoral care and accessible mental health support. Keep contingency plans live, with roles, triggers and communication paths agreed with trusts, so programmes can pivot while protecting learning outcomes.

How Student Voice Analytics helps you

• Track placement comments and sentiment continuously, with drill‑downs by mode, age, ethnicity, disability and subject band so you spot uneven experiences early.
• Compare like‑for‑like against relevant peer groups across disciplines, cohorts, sites/providers and years to evidence improvement.
• Produce concise, anonymised summaries for programme teams and placement partners, ready to brief actions without trawling through thousands of comments.
• Close the loop by monitoring issues raised on placement and reporting progress back to students and trusts.

Request a walkthrough

Book a Student Voice Analytics demo

See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and NSS requirements.

• All-comment coverage with HE-tuned taxonomy and sentiment.
• Versioned outputs with TEF-ready governance packs.
• Benchmarks and BI-ready exports for boards and Senate.

Book a demo Prefer email? [email protected]

More posts on placements fieldwork trips:

• Are placements working for counselling, psychotherapy and occupational therapy students?
• Do placements and fieldwork work for complementary and alternative medicine students?
• Do fieldwork, placements and lab work enhance biology students’ experience?
• Do placements work for psychology students?

More posts on midwifery student views:

• How did COVID-19 reshape midwifery students’ education?
• Do midwifery students get the support they need?
• Do midwifery students learn better when timetables are predictable?
• Do midwifery students view teaching staff positively?