What do mental health nursing students need from feedback?
They need feedback that arrives on time, aligns across markers, and translates into next‑step guidance they can use on placement and in assessed work. Across the National Student Survey (NSS), the feedback category records 57.3% negative comments, signalling sector‑wide issues around timeliness and usefulness. In mental health nursing, overall tone is 51.8% positive, but placements dominate the narrative (21.5% share) and carry a negative tone, so predictable, actionable feedback matters. Within assessment, students react most to clarity and applicability: feedback itself trends negative (−17.5) and marking criteria is strongly negative (−50.2). These signals shape the practical focus below. The category groups NSS open‑text on how students experience comments and turnaround across UK providers; the subject area spans mental health nursing programmes across the sector.
We focus on timing, consistency and quality of comments students receive. Understanding how feedback is perceived and implemented helps teams improve educational strategies and support learning more effectively. Using student surveys, text analysis, and listening to the student voice reveals how methods land with learners and where small changes can have outsized effects.
What happens when feedback is delayed?
Delayed feedback disrupts learning and wellbeing. Students move into new modules without knowing what to change, and motivation dips. Publishing and meeting a feedback service level agreement by assessment type, and embedding brief feed‑forward notes that specify what to do next, restores momentum. Prioritise predictable cycles in high‑volume modules and visible tracking of on‑time rates so students trust the process and can act promptly.
How do inconsistencies in feedback and marking affect learning?
Contradictory comments and variable application of marking criteria undermine confidence and blur expectations. Standardise through concise rubrics, annotated exemplars, and short calibration sprints where staff co‑mark samples. Add light‑touch spot checks for specificity, actionability and alignment to criteria. Invite student panels to review sample feedback for clarity, then close the loop with “you said → we did” updates so changes are visible.
What makes constructive criticism work in this discipline?
Students need comments that recognise strengths and provide precise, enabling guidance on improvement. In mental health nursing’s emotionally demanding contexts, balanced feedback framed around behaviours, decisions and evidence helps learners transfer insights to practice. Refer directly to the assessment brief and marking criteria, suggest concrete next steps, and keep language supportive without diluting standards.
How did COVID-19 change feedback and academic support?
The rapid move online increased speed but risked depersonalisation. Where staff use structured templates, short audio or video notes, and scheduled dialogic checkpoints, students report better uptake. Staff development that focuses on digital tone, clarity and accessibility sustains quality, while programme teams protect time for conversations about how to use feedback, not just read it.
Why does efficient university administration matter for feedback?
Operational reliability underpins effective feedback. A single source of truth for timetabling, assessment deadlines and return dates reduces confusion. Nominate visible owners for communications and publish a brief weekly “what changed and why” note. Transparent processes and prompt administration ensure students get comments while they can still act, reducing escalations elsewhere.
How do personal tutors improve feedback?
Personal tutors translate module comments into an achievable development plan. Regular check‑ins, agreement of two or three targeted actions, and signposting to resources strengthen the link between feedback and progress. Tutors can also surface patterns to programme teams, helping calibrate criteria and refine assessment briefs.
How should feedback work on placements?
Placements shape the experience and need designed feedback moments. Build short, structured on‑site conversations into rotas; provide supervisors with a simple template that references learning outcomes; and ensure comments arrive before the next shift block. Standardised, constructive placement feedback helps students connect theory to practice and reduces anxiety when settings vary.
How Student Voice Analytics helps you
Student Voice Analytics turns open‑text into tractable metrics so programme and placement teams can prioritise where practice needs attention. It benchmarks sentiment for Feedback across cohorts and subject areas, surfaces themes like placements, timetabling and marking criteria, and provides anonymised summaries and exemplars for module teams. You can drill from institution to programme, compare with relevant CAH peers, and evidence improvement over time with concise, exportable reports.
Book a Student Voice Analytics demo
See all-comment coverage, sector benchmarks, and governance packs designed for OfS quality and standards and NSS requirements.
More posts on feedback:
- Are aeronautical and aerospace engineering students getting feedback they can use?
- Is feedback helping mechanical engineering students learn?
- What do chemical, process and energy engineering students need from feedback?
- What should English studies fix first in feedback?